@9P8NRFM

r>r  Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

r>r  Personal answerNo, hire professionally trained security guards instead

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only by court order

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, and increase funding for research into the causes of mental illness

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy

r>r  Personal answerYes, and do not privatize any services

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, recent tuition increases at universities across the country are too high and need to be capped

r>r  Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech

r>r  Personal answerArtificial Intelligence in its current state, is not true AI as it cannot make its own decisions and reasoning in an independent or unbiased manner. Current AI models heavily rely on information which is/was produced by various human scholars- of whom are experts in their qualified field(s) . Therefore, AI is not an appropriate overseer within legal/criminal fields.

r>r  Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

r>r  Personal answerYes, preventative dental care is an important aspect of long term health

r>r  Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

r>r  Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone

r>r  Personal answerYes, and it should test more than just a basic level of understanding

r>r  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

r>r  Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

r>r  Personal answerIf it is safe to do so then maybe. However, deporting an individual because of a serious crime does not necessarily solve or fix an issue. The offender may still continue to commit crimes even after they are deported.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

r>r  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

r>r  Personal answerNo, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country

r>r  Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete

r>r  Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions

r>r  Personal answerYes, but not to the extent where the government has the ability of complete censorship & control of media.

r>r  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

r>r  Personal answerNo, and make the process easier for refugees

r>r  Personal answerFederal

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

r>r  Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

r>r  Personal answerYes, and forgive all student load debt

r>r  Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, as individuals who apply for immigration into Canada from high-risk countries may be doing so for their own safety.

r>r  Personal answerYes, aboriginals should be further compensated for their hardships and use of resources

r>r  Personal answerYes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

r>r  Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

r>r  Personal answerNo, sentence them to life in prison without parole instead

r>r  Personal answerYes, and increase funding for addiction prevention, rehabilitation, and medical research

r>r  Personal answerYes, and make sure that consumption centres are properly managed to ensure that all individuals (whether employees or citizens with addictions) feel that they are safe. Drug addictions should be treated with the same respect as mental health conditions & be provided with similar types of care/education services.

r>r  Personal answerNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

r>r  Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

r>r  Personal answerI do not necessarily agree with the use and production of petroleum oil, but recognise that it is more currently available than some other renewable sources of fuel. This however should not be the only source of fuel and there should be more interest/research in replacing oil as a fuel for more renewable sources.

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerI do not have enough knowledge about this topic

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only if it is their primary residence

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerIf possible, housing developments and communities should prevent environmental ecosystems from being too disturbed or destroyed. If this is not an option, previous ecosystems should be reintroduced elsewhere in an appropriate place where it can be insured that the ecosystem won't be too disturbed or possibly destroyed.

r>r  Personal answerA ban should only be in place if the products are made of materials that cannot be recycled or are not biodegradable.

r>r  Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

r>r  Personal answerNo, keep the current “first past the post” system

r>r  Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics

r>r  Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year

r>r  Personal answerYes, not every provincial government may place as high of a priority on the importance of maintaining and developing the transportation industry.

r>r  Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

r>r  Personal answerThe priority should not be building new houses, but rebuilding and repairing existing houses, making the purchase of a house easier for citizens, leaving existing or building appropriate/enriching environments for wildlife.

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only if the information was legally obtained

r>r  Personal answerNo, Enbridge has a poor history of pipeline installations

r>r  Personal answerYes, and require overtime pay for work over four days per week

r>r  Personal answerYes, and we should provide more rehabilitation programs for prisoners

r>r  Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, and increase the current amount of resources we are providing

r>r  Personal answerCanada should participate in the decision to convinct both the Israeli government and terrorist group Hamas of war crimes/human rights violations in the International Court of Justice.

r>r  Personal answerYes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote

r>r  Personal answerInstead of being mandatory, it should be strongly encouraged.

r>r  Personal answerYes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

r>r  Personal answerNo, but allow donations from unions and non-profits

r>r  Personal answerYes, and limited to two terms

r>r  Personal answerYes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery

r>r  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

r>r  Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

r>r  Personal answerNo, sovereignty cannot solve Quebec's problems

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal

r>r  Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

r>r  Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

r>r  Personal answerI am more in support of the victims and citizens who both sides experience varying levels of danger rather than the governing bodies.

r>r  Personal answerYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

r>r  Personal answerYes, and transportation systems that are not as easily accessible to disabled individuals should be renovated or if need be, replaced so that they able to provide appropriate accessibility for both people with disabilities and without disabilities.

r>r  Personal answerNo, Benjamin Netanyahu's leadership of the Israeli government has shown to be quite dangerous and authoritative.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

r>r  Personal answerYes, higher density housing/communities can lower the risk of destruction of local ecosystems.

r>r  Personal answerNo, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, but only for non-essential services

r>r  Personal answerNationalize

r>r  Personal answerNeither, replace it with a work VISA program

r>r  Personal answerYes, and implement a PISA (personal investment security account) system

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

r>r  Personal answerThe use of genetically modified seeds/foods are not always a bad thing, many foods have been modified to support growth in different climates and develop resistance against various diseases, viruses, or infections. This however may not be the case for all types of biologically engineered foods.

r>r  Personal answerYes, nuclear energy an efficient, clean, and safe source of fuel. Theoretical events of damage, collapse, epidemic, etc. only occur when nuclear energy is not appropriately handled by or in a safe and educated manner by qualified individuals/officals.

r>r  Personal answerI don't understand this question.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, but this should not be the only method of identification. For example, in order to participate in Canadian elections the voter must present at least two different forms of identification that contain the individual's name, date of birth, address, etc.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerScientifically, an embryo on its own cannot be qualified as a living organism.

r>r  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerIf the flag is a piece of public property, personal property of someone else, or government property, burning it would be an act of vanadalism & therefore illegal. However, if a flag is bought, it is considered private property and burning it would not violate any government polices/laws as it is the property of the individal who purchased it.

r>r  Personal answerNo, we should decriminalize most drugs

r>r  Personal answerYes, and all companies should require mandatory diversity training

r>r  Personal answerFederal

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation which also has spending going towards more environmentally friendly solutions.

r>r  Personal answerYes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products

r>r  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

r>r  Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

r>r  Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes

r>r  Personal answerYes, and nationalise the banks

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, for government workers but not for politicians

r>r  Personal answerAs long as lab-grown meat follows the same safety qualification tests as traditional livestock farming, there shouldn't be issue with doing so.

r>r  Personal answerNo, batteries are just as harmful to the environment

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerElect, Senators that are elected are less prone to corruption

r>r  Personal answerNo, but there should be fines or in some cases laws to combat those who consistently publish or support misinformation.

r>r  Personal answerNo, but we should increase funding to offer education and skill building services for prisoners

r>r  Personal answerNo, instead provide training and job placement assistance into non-seasonal jobs

r>r  Personal answerMany existing roads/railways are not always kept in the same condition as those in higher density/income cities. The construction of new roads/railways shouldn't be discouraged (if there was no existing road/railway in the given area to begin with) but the upkeep of existing roads/railways should be recognised and encouraged before the construction of a new road/railway.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, income splitting provides tax fairness

r>r  Personal answerInstead of artificial intelligence, military technology should have advanced programs/technology that can be controlled by professionals.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products

r>r  Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled

r>r  Personal answerYes, but put more effort into lessening the use of fuel that produce high carbon emissions.

r>r  Personal answerNo, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education

r>r  Personal answerYes, it will bring economic growth to all countries involved

r>r  Personal answerYes, and there should be more protections set in place for cyclists on public roadways.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized

r>r  Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised

r>r  Personal answerNo, as long as the advanced technology prioritises human safety and does not compromise all elements of driver input.

r>r  Personal answerYes, diesel engines produce emissions similarly to petroleum powered engines.

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes, as long as CRISPR technology is safe and suitable for use.

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerYes, individual vehicles are not usually essential for everyday transportation.

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerArtificial Intelligence in its current state, is not true AI as it cannot make its own decisions and reasoning in an independent or unbiased manner. Current AI models heavily rely on information which is/was produced by various human scholars- of whom are experts in their qualified field(s) . Therefore, AI is not an appropriate way to validate/officiate defence applications.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerAs long as the conflict is one where both parties are willing to negotiate

r>r  Personal answerYes, but I would prefer if the protocol was created and secured by a government agency instead of a decentralized protocol

r>r  Personal answerNo, I would prefer a mandatory short form with an optional long form census

r>r  Personal answerNo

r>r  Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerThis question is too vague to provide a definitive argument of either opposition or support.

r>r  Personal answerNo, there is no evidence that firms that engage in buybacks reduce their investments

r>r  Personal answerPublic transportation should be improved so that low-income individuals can access them without worrying of high cost ride-sharing services being their only options.

r>r  Personal answerYes, locks are critical to protecting artist's revenues

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerYes, the use of cryptocurrencies are often used for illict purposes such as scamming and fraud.

r>r  Personal answerYes

r>r  Personal answerIf the autonomous vehicles are not used for public transportation services like buses and trains, and instead are for private services like cabs or personal vehicles, a designated lane is not necessary.

r>r  Personal answerNo, leave the funding at its current rate, unless there is an event of emergency where current funding is not enough to control the situation.

r>r  Personal answerYes, the idea and commercialisation of drones have several positive outcomes. However, such drones should have to follow the same flight/transport safety regulations and rules that other devices use for transport and commercialisation.

r>r  Personal answerYes, if the sanctions are not completing their intended purpose and hurting the working class.

r>r  Personal answerAs long as the aesthetics of a vehicle does not hinder or conflict with the standards of protocols set in place to ensure the safety of the driver, its occupants, and other outside individuals within the presence of the automobile.

r>r  Personal answerNo