This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
@ISIDEWITH11mos11MO
No
@9ZBSN795mos5MO
CEOs shouldn’t make millions while workers are underpaid putting money in the hands of people who pay taxes is better than putting it In the hands of the rich who don’t
@B4GKHPS4 days4D
No, that is the responsibility of representation by unions and employees. Not an issue of the government
@B3XK2RM4wks4W
It depends on the company and what the CEO actually does. Do they pay their employees a fair living wage? If so, no. If employees are not paid well, then yes
@B36H68H2mos2MO
No but we need new mechanisms for making capitalism work for all. There is too much pay inequality and unions are not the answer.
@B2R667BConservative2mos2MO
No, we shouldn't disincentivize building businesses.
@B24CC9Q4mos4MO
Yes but depends on the size of the cap and the market cap of the company as well as employment numbers
@9TTLXGX7mos7MO
not a cap but a ratio since the CEO is taking a lot more risk than the employees
@9MKYHZ711mos11MO
No, if we raise taxes on the rich then the issue will solve itself
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.