Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

100 Replies

 @9GZYG4Jfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, for Homicide, mass murderer, serial killer, terrorist, rape, crime against children, crime against humanity and act of treason against the peoples of Canada.

 @9KDYD2Wfrom Saskatchewan  answered…1yr1Y

I believe the victim’s family should decide. However, I also believe that the person found guilty needs to thoroughly be proven guilty.

 @9H8JRFDfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I think the victim’s family should have a say on the punishment but I think the death penalty should be replaced with a testing penalty and all serious criminals should be used for product testing instead of animals

 @9FDJCNGfrom Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

 @9KDYHHZfrom Saskatchewan  answered…1yr1Y

I think it would only be fair if the victims family got to choose but they should be 100% proven guilty. Too many innocent lives were taken due to false sentences

 @9LMMHM7from Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but the victim's family should decide, and only if it is a horrific crime with undeniable evidence

 @9D4YVYKNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

No. We should focus on rehabilitation of people in prisons rather than punishment and/or death.

 @9JZV4G6Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I support it, with irrevocable proof. But I also know a lot that were on death row, were innocently convicted. But the amount of money that would go into retrial, was hefty back then. Serial killers should, receive the death penalty. 100%

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Death penalty is immoral. It's not okay to kill anyone even if they are a bad person. Death penalty is something that should be outlawed. Lots of innocent people end up killed in countries with death penalty.

 @9JBXLXSfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

It depends on the crime. Those who abuse children, especially Autistic children who went through ABA (applied behavioural analysis, which is objectively abusive, many Autistics myself included have had PTSD from it. Look it up), or are cops who kill POC or disabled people, vilify them based on race, sexual orientation or disability. Like George Floyd’s killer for example absolutely deserved it more than anything. Those who are clearly mentally ill should go to a mental health institution but provide rehabilitation so they are no longer a danger. But both the victims family or even the perpetrator should decide the punishment. It’s a complex answer.

 @9FP3QX2from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No, punitive justice is never justified. Each criminal should be afforded comfortable living conditions and rehabilitation if deemed possible.

 @9WBRK8Dfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, death penalty is no different than murder. Zero parole for entire life, not just a life sentence, and support consecutive life sentences.

 @9D8PLJBConservativefrom Quebec  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9K58RGLfrom Yukon Territory  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only with substantial clear evidence and only with the purpose of completely eliminating the possibility of that crime occurring by the same person a second time. Punishment is a waste, 100% prevention is worthwhile but only with crimes where the risk of recidivism is extreme. Child abuse, murder, sex trafficking, and so forth

 @9FGGGZRLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F9RQ8Xfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

It depends on the criminal and how the fair in prison. If they do well then the death penalty but if they do bad keep them there. The punishment suits the criminal and the crime

 @9FC8PV5from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

no, for two reasons which are; too many people are innocently convicted and spending life in prison is a harsher sentence. The death penalty is pretty much an easy way out. But, also i think they should improve their system because people who are mistakenly convicted of something and are sent to prison to later be found not guilty is very inhumane.

 @9Q3HJWFfrom British Columbia  answered…8mos8MO

Crimes like murder and/or sexual offences against children(living! Not fetuses)should have capital punishment

 @9VSPPZLfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5mos5MO

if the person being accused has undeniable evidence and is a horrific crime like murder, rape, sexual assault ect. the victim should get to decide (or the family if the victim is no longer alive)

 @9NHFRHJfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

No, but with the exception of corrupt CEOs or government officials. There needs to be a very high price for corruption. Especially if cost cutting measures of CEOs result in deaths of consumers.

 @9FJSRV9from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only from a pragmatic standpoint wherein the accused has been psychologically proven to be unfit to ever return to society, and there is undeniable evidence that they perpetrated the crime they're accused of. Prison is about rehabilitation, not punishment, and if no rehabilitation is possible than it is simply a cost to the taxpayers

 @9VDGM24from Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

No, rather employ inmates in harsh or less ideal workforce jobs that can be safely supervised such as road and rail construction

 @9RC97PLNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…8mos8MO

No, the death penalty will increase number of appeals and increase costs and burden to the legal system.

 @9LJGNWTPeople’s from British Columbia  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but meted out by the victim's family and only in air-tight, brutal, sadistic and truly malevolent cases. Any cased determined only by circumstantial evidence or DNA, no way. Too much room for bad trial procedure, faulty or corrupt laboratory work. It would seem that a second hearing would be needed to make sure that conviction met a VERY stringent criteria.

 @9JWMJCZ from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

We need to find out who's guilty and who's not guilty. And the family can choose the kind of torture is it from their country or way?

 @9H8NFDBfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, if a serious crime was committed and should be the victim’s family choice for the death penalty

 @9DQSF44from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the offender should have to help right some of their wrong. Skin and organ donations.

 @9DQX6M3from Nova Scotia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, this can be easily abused and lead to either wrongful convictions or future apologies due to unforgivable acts of injustice.

 @9D4V5MCfrom New Brunswick  answered…2yrs2Y

Persons sentenced to life in prison without parole should be given the option to elect death or serve the term.

 @9WB3ZBYfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, work camps, food, water, shelter, education related to harm they have caused, mental health support

 @9D5HF3Mfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only those who have taken the lives of others with undeniable evidence.

 @9V8PY4Nfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Only for the most horrific crimes. I personally think living the rest of your life in jail is much more of a suitable punishment then the death penalty.

 @9JRVZFSfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

No. I believe our justice system has a lot more growing to do concerning its own prejudices and beliefs before deciding the fate of an individual.

 @92V2G3Mfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, why have those sent to spend life in jail get free food and shelter while the rest of us have to struggle just to keep them?

 @B22MJBCfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

No, spending life is prison is a harsher sentence, and for certain cases, take away the chance for parole.

 @9ZXKYYXfrom Manitoba  answered…3mos3MO

Yes but only with undeniable evidence and should be review by a third unbiased party before the execution happens

 @97W7B5Nfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that the death penalty should be only for people who have a high chance of escaping, or if they did something REALLY bad, and it is certain that they did it.

 @97BRZXPfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, though i may believe some people deserve to die, giving any entity the power to determine who lives and who dies is a very slippery slope that quickly leads to abuse

 @93TM7X6from Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92GWKPZfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @928SH73from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

It depends on the crimes, the circumstances, the motive, and if there are multiple pre-meditated horrific crimes. A serial killer who kills for enjoyment, and has a high kill count is a person I would want to be sentenced to the death penalty.

 @97T4JZCConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, abolish the death penalty. Jail should be for the worst criminals, and rehabilitation should be the best resort

 @95QY385from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

The family's victims should definitely have a say and the victims should have the absolute say in the punishment, if they say dead then that's what happens, send them to space if it's bad enough idc

 @ALcubbybear88 from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

No, any use of the death penalty at any level of government is a clear violation of The Ten Commandments and I strongly oppose any and all effort to reinstate it

 @9FMS945from Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

No it costs too much, and the risk of an innocent person being wrongly convicted is too high

 @97Z84HSConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9VH57MJfrom Quebec  answered…5mos5MO

yes, but only for horric crimes with undeniable evidence where the accused had no reason or without a justifiable reason such as if the victim was the accused abuser

 @97WPXL8from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Only if the criminal is insane and doesn't regret his choices. Every human deserves a second chance and if the criminal repents religiously or lawfully he deserves a new shot at life.

 @B3286XSfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only if the crime is horrible, the evidence is undeniable, and it is unlikely the offender can be rehabilitated. i.e., they pose a considerable danger to society.

 @B2YYSZCfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only if the crime was extremely severe and if the person receiving the penalty shows no remorse or regret for their actions, and there is undeniable evidence to back it up, then yes.

 @B2V98GVfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

No, but depends on what kind of prison they get sentenced to life they're in. Some prisons around the world treat inmates better than the homeless.

 @8VJ45NWfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V22D8Yfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, (depending on the crime) There should be more rehabilitation programs in prison or opportunities given available to prisoners to live a mentally comfortable life

 @8TVQYLPfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the focus should be on rehabilitation and reintegration, not corporal punishment.

 @8TVGH7Lfrom Newfoundland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TCK7HGConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T9WJLTfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T5RFQKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, with heinous crime(s), the victim(s) family(s) should decide the punishment.

 @9ZL2DKRfrom Manitoba  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but let any inmate that’s eligible for the death penalty choose between life behind bars or execution.

 @9YHWCHTGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

For serial rapists and murderers, I believe they should be forced to undergo the same violence they inflicted on their victims.

 @8ZB3SJQfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

i think the person should be able to choose between life in jail or the death penalty, but once they make the choice they can not choose differently (ex: 6 yrs in wants the death penalty)

 @8YV8QCQfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VRBJT8from Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

I believe criminals that commit horrific crimes should be punished accordingly. Murderers should be murdered, rapists should be raped and pedophiles should suffer the death penalty as they’re a threat to society.

 @8VNNSTZfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

No, only because it costs more to execute than care for an inmate for life.

 @8V8ZWQGfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

no because even tho the person did something wrong they dont deserve do die

 @9Y34V2BLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

No, but the time on life sentences should be made longer and they shouldn't be given a chance for parrol

 @fjamalConservativefrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but there must be undeniable evidence to rule out possible innocence, and if so, then death must be deemed a harsher punishment compared to life in prision.

 @8SYYW9Yfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

The offender should be allowed to choose between a life sentence and a death sentence

 @8SLS73Sfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only President or working in the government that are Traitor to their own People that they serve or people working in the military selling out our country

 @8SJCDNNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SF7HN3from Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for horrific crimes or crimes involving the abuse/neglect of children with undeniable evidence.

 @8S6WXGGfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S295MYfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but sentences for the most heinous crimes must focus on punishment as opposed to rehabilitation.

 @7TTTZL6People’sfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, spending life in prison when there is undeniable evidence puts an economical strain on the justice system.

 @8RNLPBGfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R9YBHVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No but sexual assault offenders should not be protected in jail and should be put into the general public of prison

 @8R7P9KZfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R32C5Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the death penalty is and always has been immoral, regardless of the crime committed by the criminal.

 @8QT4R94from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QT42JMfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

well you a-holes have a thing with killing people of colour and then letting white criminals get away with s**t so who the f**k knows huh?

 @8QR6LHVfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

I support the death penalty for murder but at the same time I don't like government having all that power.

 @8QQN24Qfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No. However, they should stay life in prison with 0 chance of parole. I view this as a harsher sentence, they can rot in there. In fact, what ever happens to said criminal (rape, beatings etc) is well deserved, for the many years that they would have to endure.

 @8QHTWWRfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PYLSN9from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PYFGKYfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

yes to the point that i believe there should be a torture to death penalty.

 @8PKXZ4Yfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for murder charges with undeniable evidence and the victim’s family should decide the punishment.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...