Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @8VJ7MXZfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9F3YN58from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No the pipeline is a poor idea, why are we sending raw materials out of the country when we could refine and use them locally to reduce costs to the people that live here. Don’t get me started on how invasive it will be to the remaining wilderness. Stop obsessing over oil and gas, its non renewable and it will run out, its high time to move on from fossil fuels.

 @9DB86MGfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9D4V5MCfrom New Brunswick  answered…1yr1Y

 @8V8LQD4New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I don’t think the government has the right to take land in order to build the pipe line.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but a private company should not be the ones who do the project, the government should take it over, turn it into a state controlled industry and seize property as necessary so long as farmers and homeowners are compensated, corporate landowners will be given no compensation.

 @9TQ2G2Cfrom Newfoundland  answered…3mos3MO

I believe its necessary for the economic future of Canada but also fairly compensating the land owners

 @9QSV5BHfrom California  answered…6mos6MO

Complicated, I think the landowners should be warned ahead of time and given more than fair compensation, but only if they consent to having their land used.

 @9P8NRFMNew Democratic from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

I do not necessarily agree with the use and production of petroleum oil, but recognise that it is more currently available than some other renewable sources of fuel. This however should not be the only source of fuel and there should be more interest/research in replacing oil as a fuel for more renewable sources.

 @9L8JRVWBloc Québécoisfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated AND that's if the pipeline even goes through to begin with.

 @9JZP7TYfrom Quebec  answered…10mos10MO

Only if there are no alternative solutions and only if the property owners are fairly compensated. the economy is important for the future of Canadians

 @9JQ8T5Jfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Not, not unless the landowners are fairly compensated & all Indigenous communities in the area agree.

 @9J34VJWfrom Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

It should be supported if land owners are fairly compensated, and a reduction of oil production from tar sands.

 @9GVMYT3from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No the government should respect private property. If a Private company wants to expropriate private property they must compensate a fair market prices

 @9FT46P4from Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

A stronger discussion should be had between the government and the first nation peoples to make a compromise between the two parties. The land should be protected while also allowing the pipeline to be built elsewhere to provide employment for the first nations peoples surrounding the area of the pipeline.

 @9FQ2ZJYfrom Yukon Territory  answered…1yr1Y

No, this may pressure private land owners into taking money at their long term jealth and safety

 @9FL5ZGXfrom Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

 @9FHNJS3from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F98QSTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @8Y2WVZVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the Government should not be able to take private land freely from its people without good reasoning.

 @8VVTY6Nfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NVWKMVfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

Allow the pipeline by seeking consent from landlords and revive oil sands! Allow oil production in oil sands.

 @8FZX7LHfrom New Brunswick  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8FH253Rfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No, having the pipeline will reduce the incentive to switch to clean energy

 @995SMBCfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96R332Nfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

If the owners of said property allow it and if allowed get paid compensation

 @95LSVQVfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated and they agree to give up their land

 @945L3BVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if the landowners agree to sign over their land and are fiarly compensated. Almost more like a sale than expropriation

 @936NX9Zfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only on land that is not owned by anybody and/or any indigenous people.

 @92TFFD8from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, unless the land is currently owned by Indigenous Peoples or is unceded land.

 @8ZQGFZBfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YWNWC3from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

No expropriation but allow negotiations. And get pipelines built to meet demand.

 @8Y3NCLYfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes as long as the company is held accountable to the communities their harming the most

 @8WZ4NMBfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VLKV3Yfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VK36R4from New Brunswick  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VJXJ2SConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only IF the land owner agrees to sell the land. If not then they have to move the layout of the pipeline

 @8VJQP9Yfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with a requirement that the owners of the expropriated land receive royalties on the oil that flows through there in perpetuity including their heirs.

 @8VH22SVfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @andreakkmrfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VDDZM8from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

If indigenous are all agreed AND the land owners are properly compensated

 @8VDDFN9Liberalfrom Newfoundland  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VCMQ8Pfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VBBZG7from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

I believe they can negotiate the land from the owner, but not expropriation.

 @8V7LPJXfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Not without fair compensation including a swap of equal size land and move cost included. Also start up costs if required.

 @8V72WKCConservativefrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Re-route, private companies should not be able to expropriate land or private property

 @8V5J64NPeople’sfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V4D8C9from Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

No, expropriation is wrong and the pipeline should only be built upon approval from all of the land owners.

 @Canadian1from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

If property owners are fairly compensated and treated with utmost respect re burial grounds and relocation plans etc. Civility and regard.

 @8TYJGN5from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the owners should be given the right to negotiate for compensations and/or sales of the land.

 @8TYF9YNGreenfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Up to owners and extreme regulations must be met so it doesn’t hurt our environment.

 @8TX5JVBfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, do not build the pipeline and create a plan to replace the oil production in the tar sands with a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative

 @8TRPMHXfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I am unsure at this moment/ don’t have enough information to formulate an opinion

 @8T8PGV9from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SZ4XV2from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S49XVXfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RWBJNQfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

They should not use the government to force the landowners of their land, instead they should get the land themselves with a level of government support.

 @8RVXCRGfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RQCBY6from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @shaelynjfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

no, find a better way but if it’s needed then the landowners need to be fairly compensated

 @8QXR442New Democraticfrom Newfoundland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QX2HL8from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated. I don't like oil but I think Keystone is a better alternative than the U.S. getting oil from Saudi Arabia.

 @8PSZYX7from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PPLF2TNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Same as previous question answer. - Canadian Oil, processed in Canada, for Canadians, Only. End reliance on Imported Oil.

 @8PL7XKXLiberalfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but theres need to be a way for it to be done safley without harming the community living their and the enviroment.

 @8PJQWSRfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PJMGYMfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If landowners consent to allowing the pipeline to be built on their property

 @8P9DDJMfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No they should not take the land, but compensate them for digging under their land.

 @8P9CY8Qfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8P784MTfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No, kick TransCanada or have Canada work with federal, provincial and other pipeline related company to work on this pipeline.

 @8P3F3JTfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but the land owners should be more than fairly compensated. By law They should be offered portfolios of beautiful homes to choose one of , plus fair value market for their home, plus moving and storing expenses and incidentals , travel expenses, etc until they are fully comfortable in their beautiful new homes. And the company should be fully responsible for the safety of all of the assets of the person ie they cannot offer them a space that will not accommodate the person or is not fully to the liking and agreement of the person.

 @8NZWYH6from Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NW2DWMfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KMCS9Rfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but nationalize all oil, natural gas, and gasoline, keeping what is extracted from the tar sands for national use

 @8JYQF8Tfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8JDRVHPfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, of the landowners have say and are more than fairly compensated for this may interfere with their long term family incomes

 @8H6PJNMfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pipeline is necessary but shouldn't need to go through private property

 @8F3PG2ZConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, with excellent compensation to land owners, transparency, flawless quality control, and rerouting to avoid any vulnerable environments.

 @8DFVTYVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes if landowners are very well compensated, Indigenous lands are respected, and environmental considerations heeded.

 @8CCZXDPfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

By "private property" do you mean reserve land? It kind of feels like you mean reserve land...

 @9BZXLCFfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BZ8XQ8from Quebec  answered…2yrs2Y

With the consent of the landowners of that private property, we can financially compensate them and provide them another home away from the construction of the pipeline.

 @9B55SJDfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99TBJHYfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should never be allowed to expropriate private property

 @998B7W3from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @995WHT5from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, do not build the pipeline and shut down all oil production in the tar sands, we should invest in cleaner alternatives

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...