Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

No

Waste of money when there are other solutions. People are just too selfish, stubborn, and misinformed.

No, other countries will get there before Canada and the technology will be easily available once this happenes.

Yes, but should have strict oversight over geoengineering projects to prevent risky innovations.

Yes, but only with a gradual implementation, & that it is constantly tested & improved upon.

Yes depending on the budget and if the main needs of the country are met first then we can focus on a need that can change the whole world.

No, as geoengineering has not yet been proven to address the root causes of climate change

No, but incentivize private companies willing to do it instead

if you could control the weather for a day, what changes would you make and why?

Yes but since climate change is a global issue, they should take it up with the UN

Yes, as long as there is enough research and approval

I believe the should find ways to fight against climate change but not spend to much doing it

No, and we should campaign against harmful geo-engineering globally.

Yes, but ensure judgement throughout as to whether that level of environmental meddling & manipulation will have any unaccounted for consequences

No, simply, known solutions to climate change should be utilized instead if spending time and money on new research that may or may not get used.

Only fund research into geoengineering as a last ditch effort to combat climate change.

No, instead, invest aggressively into sustainable renewable resources like solar, wind, and geothermal

YES, but only if research is not harming the environment.

Yes but in a way that will not allow lenience in companies to increase their carbon footprint.

Yes, as long as its proven to work and not have any detrimental effects and is regulated by the government

At what point is the research that has already happened be enough

This is a last ditch approach... we need to decarbonize our economy, not allow oil companies to make excuses

That's not the main focus that we should be working on right now, so either no funding at all or maybe small amounts for the future

No, a government should instead focus on limiting its ecological footprint.

How would you react if your favorite natural landscape was altered by a scientific solution meant to stabilize the climate?

Do you think humans should intervene in nature's processes to prevent further climate change, or should we focus solely on reducing emissions?

How would you feel if a sudden change in technology could instantly cool the planet but had unknown risks?

What role do you think future generations should play in deciding the solutions to climate change we use today?

Would knowing that geoengineering could affect countries differently change how you feel about it?

In your opinion, should humanity take risks to drastically fix the environment, or should we tread carefully with small steps?

Do you think altering Earth’s climate systems is ethical if it slows down global warming but disturbs ecosystems?

What would you say to someone who believes humans are responsible for fixing every problem we caused, even if the solutions may be dangerous?

How much do you trust science to solve big environmental problems like climate change, and why?