Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @8CHMKVPfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should be monitored carefully so they don't step over the line.

 @4G23J2Yfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

There is no doubt we are presently living in a dystopian world, but in western countries tend to see this through "rose colored glasses". I personally believe, we are in a global crisis. This emerging terrorism, is a symptom of these corporation wars for the control of foreign resources i.e., oil. These Middle Eastern countries have a feudal age mindset and are acting much like Europeans did a thousand years ago. Some radicals are, in fact envious of the progressive nature of democratic countries, and seek to destroy what they could never achieve through peace and prosperity.

 @4PGFBLBfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the complete disregard which Bill C-51 displays for civil rights in the interest of averting 'terrorism' is an egregious example of self-fulfilling prophecy.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I do not support racial profiling and such (which is where many people would develop suspicion). As terrorism is increasing, I find it more important to support defence and preventive measures. The less fault we have is safest. Education is more important to support, and I am opposed to control at this chaotic time. Premature detaining would not stop extremist plans anyway, as I have noticed.

 @9ZZNB4NConservativefrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

I am a little torn about this question because of course I want myself and all of Canada protected from terrorism but there needs to be policies in place that protect Canadians rights to privacy. The government cannot just spy on their citizens without actual evidence.

 @9ZZ6GJWfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

As long as people's lives aren't monitered more than 50% of the time, it would be a safe bet to prevent potential terroist attacks.

 @9ZNXRCYfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

I like the idea of the bill and what its trying to do, but without proper execution, this bill could start more problems

 @9SSRG9Hfrom Manitoba  answered…4mos4MO

Yea but there needs to be policies in place that protect a persons right to privacy. The government cannot have complete freedom to spy on their citizens without probable cause.

 @9SR7BTCfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

i think we should protect our country from terrorism, but get rid of immagrints who want to build a new life

 @9RBWNKLfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Don’t have enough information on Bill C-51 to comment (and this kind of question sets it up as a “pro/con police” or “pro/con anti-terrorism” situation without context).

 @9RBRS6Mfrom Nova Scotia  answered…5mos5MO

This should fall under the military. Certain elements of the Canadian forces should or could operate within the country

 @9QW6XK7from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

I would support it more if it was watered down. I support the safety of citizens but I don't support the government spying on citizens.

 @9QQVM6Kfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

yes, I agree that expanding local police and intelligence agencies' authority to prevent terrorism is important, but there should be more regulations on what that would involve and that the power is balanced.

 @9MLXWMNfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Needs more clarification. Given the recent developments, I'm all for strengthening police and intelligence capabilities.

 @9MCJ3PYConservativefrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Yes but this policiy made a lot of people way more racist towards muslims and middle eastern communities

 @9M3P8JHfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Yes for intelligence agencies but if we allowed polices there might be police violence and power abuse

 @9LK27QTfrom Saskatchewan  answered…8mos8MO

No unless sufficient evidence is presented to say otherwise (actual proof of them being a terrorist) spying on someone you think might be a terrorist is not ever OK

 @9L5NYBVLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, if a House of Commons committee is tasked with reviewing the decisions made by intelligence agencies in enforcing this act.

 @9L57DMRfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

It’s a difficult question because I don’t want my privacy to be invaded but I don’t want any terrorism to happen

 @9DZP8FJfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9DJVGVY from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9D7KWCWfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes but increase screening and training to get rid of individuals that use or will use their power for malicious purposes.

 @9ZFC3N5from Saskatchewan  answered…1mo1MO

Yes if privacy guidelines are created and unforced to protect any information not considered to be illegal

 @9XPYXJFfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Not entirely, police powers should be limited in how much they can interfere with citizens right to privacy.

 @9WGYK7Rfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

police should be smarter and more nice to others no matter what they like or dislike and support the community of the lesbian and gay and other types i'm not one of them i just support them.

 @9W57V45from British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Possibly but it’d need to be more specific and have more requirements and stuff so there’s no abuse of power or whatever.

 @9VLNYY5Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

I teeenk that if hwe just geeve them urr loucky chermmmss everywone while leeve happeeely every after

 @9TZYRSKfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

it should be less vague, like what the last sentence of the 'learn more' says. I am strongly against terrorism, however

 @9TR533Janswered…3mos3MO

This bill should only be implemented in case of extreme periods of tensions and risk, and the government should be totally transparent towards civilians on the extend of the surveillance they are under

 @9TP6Y52from Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but not to a certain point. There just still be a point for arrests. It goes against Canada's values and our rights.

 @9TMG6K4from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

no not at all this is violent and taken away someones right to feeling safe this is a violation of someones life they cant be ditained for a suspition this is not right

 @9TLVCVNRhinocerosfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3mos3MO

The bill is too vague, although the intent behind it is to prevent terrorism, which is something the country should invest in.

 @9T7XY37from Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

unless there in a warranted reason to suspect one of being a threat to a nations national security or people, I see no need.

 @9RTSMX5from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

This bill could be good as long as it is Practice lightly. It is important to me that the average citizen is not monitored 24/7

 @9RTLWCPIndependentfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, I would support it, but it is a little too vague in some aspects, limit it to just intelligence agencies fighting terrorism, the local police shouldn't get involved with that. Provide more accountability. The bill needs more work

 @9JWMJCZ from Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

They should only do it when there's evidence about a terrorist attack is the only time they should expand local police and intelligence agencies' authority to prevent terrorism.

 @9J9LDD5 from Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

No, because it would make a way to accuse a certain group of people for terrorism when it is always done by others.

 @9J8J744from Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Sure but thus requires officers to undergo more education on the true meaning of terrorism and what it looks like as people tend to associate terrorism with one specific group of individuals when it is predominantly done by others.

 @9J7VZ3Zfrom Quebec  answered…11mos11MO

It would be a conditional yes for me but I would have to read the bill on how they define terrorism and if there are other things I object to that’s included in the bill like having a police state and the corruption that could ensue. So yes, but with conditions.

 @9J66F7Tfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

The definition of terrorism seems to get lost in translation and people tend to stick it to a certain group of people. Further education and knowledge is needed for this bill.

 @9HSTJPK from Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but ONLY if police take a college or university course in Law. The majority of Police officers have no idea what the laws actually mean they are arresting people for! If you are a public servant you should be held to a high standard.

 @9HCSTN2from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the bill should be amended so that claims of terrorist activity are fully proven and that csis has absolute reasonable grounds and provable grounds to suspect someone of terrorism, and only with a permit or court order. Disrupting protests should also not be allowed.

 @9H9QP5Vfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on whose being highered and how they are planning to control terroism but yes for the most part.

 @9H2DR3Tfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

even if it is good to prevent terrorism i still feel the sense of not being in my own private space when I'm alone

 @9GNM9GSfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

I agree and disagree because I agree that preventing terrorism is important so giving a little more authority to the police and intelligence agencies may help but I also disagree because giving them too much authority may restrict certain freedoms and push boundaries that people in society have so there's a fine balance between giving enough authority to them, but not enough to cause trouble.

 @9GMSV2Ffrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

"I firmly believe in the importance of our local police and intelligence agencies taking the required steps to safeguard our national security. It is their duty to protect citizens from potential threats while respecting individual privacy.

As for Bill C-51, which seeks to enhance the powers of these agencies to combat terrorism, it's crucial to strike a balance between security and personal freedoms. Finding this equilibrium is a complex challenge, but we must ensure that any expansion of authority is subject to stringent checks and balances. The safety of our nation is paramount, but so is the preservation of our civil liberties. It is essential that we scrutinize this legislation with a keen eye to ensure it maintains this equilibrium."

 @9GFVHJMfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

no because it bans certain firearms and they are not the problem the problem are the people using them and it also gives the government permission to censor stuff from us

 @9GFJBNGRhinocerosfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

I think that police shouldn't have their funding cut, but I don't think they should put all their resources into preventing terrorism when there are more pressing local issues.

 @9GCWMD7from Nova Scotia  answered…1yr1Y

This initially seems like a good idea but that being said i think a system like this could just as easily invade the privacy of a number of well meaning citizens

 @9FW96MTanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, as long it used only for searching suspects. With permission from individuals, but not when crime is committed, just in general, if they want to. Private information usage only for police to help, no selling it.

 @9FNVPPVfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Further intell is always helpful. Giving police too much power is not usually beneficial.

 @9FL7SJ9from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I believe that the bill has a great cause but it should have been more exact and if it risks the security of the people of Canada then it should not be done.

 @9FKYB5Ffrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9FKR42XConservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

yes, but only to a certian extent because if they have to much power it will be abused for the lesser.

 @9FKPLGWfrom Saskatchewan  answered…1yr1Y

i don't stand on either side. i prefer not to get involved with politics but have to do this for my History 30 class

 @9FD7JXTfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F9NBZJfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F86WNDLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F74W7Ffrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F6YRJ8from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes as long as they don't take advantage of the right and use it properly

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Only proven terrorists should be deported and monitored. Monitoring suspected terrorists and deporting them can lead to minorities being falsely targeted.

 @9CMNF9Yfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I feel like instead of assuming every muslim is a terriost look at people who accually look like teriost or do a crimnal background check

 @9CLJFYRfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I am currently unsure of the specifics of what Bill C-51 allows so I cannot say at this time what my stance is.

 @9C8YBHHfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, unless there is sufficient evidence to suspect a threat to public safety

 @9C2536Nfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

It's not an issue in Canada I think so they can put money into it but not that much

 @9BKGN7Hfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99YD6GCLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98CNPRHfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

I dont really trust the police force I feel like they could wrongly convict someone they should only detain if they have solid proof the suspect is a terrorist

 @97W5664from Nova Scotia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96J58QJfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the bill isn’t specific on the accountability of the officers

 @96HP2BLfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

it depends; there should be a certain set of rules before it becomes too much of a police enforced state. boundaries must be clearly established and must be adjusted according to abnormal situations to avoid major damages.

 @96HJ2SSfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96FBYZSfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Somewhat. But I dont like the idea of them looking into our personal info

 @969T38Qfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

no cause it will lead to more racial profiling, get better security and treat everyone the same

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...