Try the political quiz
+

100 Replies

 @9ZYVF3Mfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

During recessions there should be tax breaks for low income individuals and sectors heavily affected by the recession, but the government should also reduce spending excess.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, we can do more than 1 thing at a time, we can collectivize industry that has collapsed from the private sector, turn it around to become profitable and fund social programs but also as a right away thing protect thousands of jobs. tax breaks, spending more repairing infrastructure to attract businesses, assisting other failing sectors with wage subsidies and mortgage/rent freezing/coverage. theres a lot we can and should do to stop the awful symptoms of recession.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

as long as it goes to support the 60% of canadian who actually create the jobs, not govt consulting contracts

 @9RFSJMHIndependentfrom New Brunswick  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, to reasonably sustainable amounts that do not cause excessive increases in the national debt. This should also be coupled with paying down the debt during good times.

 @9FQB6TFConservativefrom Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

Tax breaks for all working people not just the poor. The working people are the ones keeping the country running.

 @9FPVJCGfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Fiscally responsible spending and balanced budgets in periods of high economic growth gives governments the flexibility to increase spending on infrastructure while reducing taxes in times of recession.

 @9FB4M2Cfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

The government should be making sure people who lost their jobs due to a recession get a basic income to pay for their food, water, electricity and shelter. Quick action needs to be taken to ensure the economy gets back on track but not at the cost of cutting government funding.

 @9DQSF44from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9D536B2from Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but in the form of assisiting sectors most hit by the recessions and tax breaks for low income citizens.

 @9D4R2DYfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens; increased spending on infrastructure; and in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession.

 @9CQ8CWTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Collectivize failing industries, provide financial relief in the forms of debt forgiveness, tax breaks to the poor and middle income citizens and spending on infrastructure

 @9GYSNHDfrom Nova Scotia  answered…1yr1Y

It depends on the different circumstances and what they call for. Not every economic recession or crisis can be solved the exact same way.

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on the different circumstances and what they call for. Not every economic recession or crisis can be solved the exact same way.

 @8ZR6F7Tfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes. The best way to stimulate the economy is to raise the income of lower income individuals. A UBI at CERB levels (plus drug, dental) would stimulate the economy more than anything.

 @8TTKRJ3People’sfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T9NTX4from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the government should intervene in order to boost a recovery. They should help in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, provide tax breaks for the poor and middle class, and by increased spending on infrastructure

 @8SF7HN3from Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens while assisting sectors most heavily hit my the recession.

 @8RQRK5PConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RGGHHQfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but critical businesses that need to be saved should be nationalized instead of bailed out

 @8QTX67Rfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Government intervention could be helpful, but the government itself needs to spend less too. They should not rely on tax breaks and citizens to aid.

 @8QHTWWRfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QF74GYfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but not to bail out the banks, rather provide assistance to the people

 @8PP4HKQfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8DWMSNFfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CCZXDPfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, it is an investment in the overall well being of the country, and it citizens.

 @9C4XQMMfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and give tax breaks to those in the higher tax bracket as well since these citizens worked hard to climb the ladder and earn a better living for themselves. These folks will also be spending their earnings at local stores, which injects money back into the economy.

 @99G9S5Lfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with a mixture of assisting sectors hit the most by recession, tax breaks for low income citizens, and spending on infrastructure.

 @98PQTLXfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but the government should use the Treasury Department to manage money and financial risks in banks

 @95TJW43from Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZR8QDRConservativefrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

No, government should lower personal and corporate taxes and reduce spending.

 @8XMLGT4from British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but, if a deficit is incurred the debt should be paid back during times of strong economic growth

  @8TXVXMLfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the Government should just get out of the way of the private sector. In most cases.

 @8TWKYN5from Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes in the form of tax breaks for citizens and drastically reduced spending on foreign aid.

 @8TRZKDRfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but avoid asset inflation by using fiscal stimulus, not monetary stimulus.

 @8Q7KDKNfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, by providing tax relief for low income citizens, by investing in infrastructure, and by the government intervening in order to boost a recovery

 @593CCZ5answered…4yrs4Y

No, government stimulus is bad for the market and tax payer, especially when government causes said recessions and depressions i.e. the great depression and great recession. That was government failure and is just failed Keynesian economics that have only hurt people since Keynesian economics became the norm.

 @8Q6C4Y4 from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Sometimes government intervention may be necessary, but only as a last resort

 @3HS499Canswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only for individuals of low income that make less than 40 thousand a year.

 @92JXK3J from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Stimulus exacerbates the problem. The poor must be given tax breaks, whilst the rich must have to pay a little bit higher taxes. Let the market correct itself over time. The government, besides using taxes, should only encourage people to work and correct recessions. Otherwise, it should sit back, correct misinformation, and let economists and the people handle recessions.

 @8WPN6C2 from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92XBN65 from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but in the form of A. tax breaks for low-income citizens, B. tax breaks for all citizens, C. increased spending on infrastructure, and/or D. assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession. Plus, the government should try to intervene to boost a recovery.

 @8VC2Q88 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8QT5JBT from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

only if there is a great need, much like this pandemic. and the money should actually go to people in need unlike what happened with this pandemic

 @8R7SQ2V from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, government stimulation is like steroids; It may help in the short term, but it will inevitably lead to problems later on due to, put simply, overexpansion. This is what caused the Great Depression, 2008, and nearly every other major recession.

 @8H4DF7B from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Do a study on the efficiency and ethics and effects of each tax and apply accordingly.

 @6PJZCMJ from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of providing employment opportunities (like the Civilian Conservation Corps).

 @7YFGPVT from Utah  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only.

Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan.

  @DsInferno from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for everyone except those in the highest tax bracket

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but it should do it's best to help without using direct government power to do it. For example, they can have a competition to have the public crowdsource solutions.

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

 @5ZHZMH6 from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but individual's who are in need should apply for the stimulus. It shouldn't just be given to everyone.

 @6NLNK8C from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but quantitative easements must stop as they endanger our economy more than they help it.

 @7BV3LB6 from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

 @kgtiberius from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but 1) only at a locally combined rate at the Region/State/Metro area to the specifically affected companies and their employees, 2) to sectors that provide immediate jobs, training, and 3) a patr-time State/Federal volunteer program various public works projects (part-time to allow for re-education, earned income, and time off to look for new work or relocation).

 @78Q5L5B from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7TBYDNY from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and during the next large recession, the government should prioritize switching to the metric system

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits

 @89L4VVJ from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks and increased spending on infrastructure since they are both proven ways to boost the economy

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession and extended unemployment benefits for workers

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of individual unemployment compensation benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending unemployment benefits for a greater length of time

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, with an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

 @8CLVKTG from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CN7P7L from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

No, there is not enough money to do so. If we print out more money inflation will go up and the American dollar will devalue.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, through the combination of increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending the time period for receiving unemployment compensation benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, tax breaks for low income citizens, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation for workers.

 @8CYG8KL from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only depending on how many people are in the household, and the current rate should be reduced.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle-income and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended time periods for citizens to receive unemployment benefits. ,

 @9ZK3JNSfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, by lowering taxes, intervening to keep businesses afloat and subsidize wages and collectivize industries that are going to go belly up.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits for both middle income and low income citizens

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, in the forms of extended unemployment compensation and increased spending on infrastructure

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...