Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

Yes

The issue is a lack of public transportation infrastructure- congestion pricing will only increase economic pressure on citizens who are forced to drive on their communte

Yes, introduce congestion pricing for single commuter vehicles so that vehicles that are used for delivering goods and service can do it more cost effectively and quicker.

I support congestion pricing in principle, as it has proven effective in cities with strong transit systems. However, without similar transit reliability and accessibility in Canadian cities, implementing congestion charges may unfairly burden commuters who lack viable alternatives. Before introducing congestion pricing, Canada should prioritize substantial improvements to public transit, ensuring it’s a realistic and accessible option for everyone. With a robust transit network in place, congestion pricing could then be an effective tool to manage traffic and reduce emissions.

No, there should be more emphasis on work-from-home whenever possible to reduce congestion and reduce pollution.

Cities should provide more buses for usage instead of increasing the prices for users.

Yes, only if more money goes towards mass transit.

yes, but more and better public transportation systems need to be implemented to support the influx of people.

no, congestion pricing just favors people with lots of money

Certain industries that require commercial travel should be waived and only limit congestion tax during rush hours.

Yes, but only with decreases in costs for public transportation and trains, and an increase in bike lanes etc. (easier access to alternative options)

No, but we should have better public transportation leading to those areas to encourage using it over driving.

Only if public transportation is really effective in the surrounding area

Yes, but cities must complement fees with easy access using alternative means of transit

no, cities should do better to meet growing infrastructure requirements than taxing current citizens for the growing needs.

Yes, but only if robust public transportation options are available.

Yes, and create more spaces where cars are not allowed at all.

It would depend on how it is implemented, what routes are affected etc.

No, instead, build better and more efficient transport infrastructure

No, unless massive investments in public transit are made

Yes but only if the city has an adequate, reliable and affordable public transit system.

No, the citizens should not be punished for poorly designed roadways

Build up and stop sprawl. Then people will walk and bike and not use vehicles to congest the roads.

Imagine your daily commute cost more because of traffic charges; how might that change your travel habits?

Can you think of a time you were stuck in traffic and wished there were fewer cars on the road? How might congestion pricing have felt like a solution?

If you knew your commute charges would help fund cleaner public transport options, would that change your opinion on congestion pricing?

How might businesses in charging zones be affected by congestion pricing, and do you think their concerns are valid?

Imagine a future where city centers are free from traffic thanks to congestion pricing; what positive and negative effects do you foresee?

No, provide more public transportation and incentives for people who use public transportation to reduce traffic congestion.

If certain roads cost money to use during peak times, what alternative transportation methods might you consider?

What are your thoughts on paying extra to drive in busy areas if the money was used to improve public transportation?

How would you propose balancing the need to reduce city congestion with ensuring fair access for all income levels?

How would you feel if driving into downtown areas cost more during rush hours to reduce traffic?