Congestion pricing is a system where drivers are charged a fee to enter certain high-traffic areas during peak times, aiming to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Proponents argue that it effectively reduces traffic and emissions while generating revenue for public transportation improvements. Opponents argue that it unfairly targets lower-income drivers and may simply shift congestion to other areas.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@ISIDEWITH11mos11MO
No
@9ZBJW4Z5mos5MO
Congestion pricing provides an incentive to choose alternate modes of transportation besides driving for typical commuting while simultaneously raising funds to continue to improve public transportation infrastructure. It is also better for drivers in the long term - more people choosing public transportation over driving makes the roads less congested for the drivers that remain and once the new transit infrastructure is robust enough the congestion pricing can be removed.
@9RC97PLNew Democratic9mos9MO
No, but promote high efficiency transit to reduce congestion
@9RDJFXL9mos9MO
What cities would you consider this?
@B43QV9M3wks3W
No, unless the situation is dire AND there is sufficient infrastructure in place to not use vehicles
@B3DT8TDNew Democratic1mo1MO
Yes, and cities should be organized in a way that promotes walkable cities, bicycle lanes and public transportation
@B3CPZL71mo1MO
Should the Israeli government prime minister is amount of traffic aren't Budget pretty wise issues by Ireland prime minister control are aboved grades area's at anyways
@B38NWBT2mos2MO
No, wtf! What happens if there are accidents or road closures? Don't take away people's options who are unable to pay when they could absolutely NEED to be somewhere on time.
@B3286XS2mos2MO
No, improve traffic by implementing better public transport system, better city planning, and allowing for more flexible work hours.
@B2JKHRW3mos3MO
No, encourage employers to implement work from home policies and remote solutions in these cities instead
@B2BMK7B3mos3MO
Yes, but only for highly congested areas, & make exceptions for fuel-efficient & low/zero emissions vehicles.
@B29BM443mos3MO
The last thing we need is more taxes, we the people have already paid for these roads and the maintenance through taxes, build better transit systems, bike lanes etc
@9ZCHMWG5mos5MO
The issue is a lack of public transportation infrastructure- congestion pricing will only increase economic pressure on citizens who are forced to drive on their communte
@9ZC74X65mos5MO
Yes, introduce congestion pricing for single commuter vehicles so that vehicles that are used for delivering goods and service can do it more cost effectively and quicker.
@9YNMQD95mos5MO
I support congestion pricing in principle, as it has proven effective in cities with strong transit systems. However, without similar transit reliability and accessibility in Canadian cities, implementing congestion charges may unfairly burden commuters who lack viable alternatives. Before introducing congestion pricing, Canada should prioritize substantial improvements to public transit, ensuring it’s a realistic and accessible option for everyone. With a robust transit network in place, congestion pricing could then be an effective tool to manage traffic and reduce emissions.
@9YJ9RPL5mos5MO
No, there should be more emphasis on work-from-home whenever possible to reduce congestion and reduce pollution.
@9XBCJXQBloc Québécois5mos5MO
Cities should provide more buses for usage instead of increasing the prices for users.
@9WVQPGK5mos5MO
Yes, only if more money goes towards mass transit.
@9WSJYRY6mos6MO
yes, but more and better public transportation systems need to be implemented to support the influx of people.
@9WHRDPN6mos6MO
no, congestion pricing just favors people with lots of money
@9WCRHFQ6mos6MO
Certain industries that require commercial travel should be waived and only limit congestion tax during rush hours.
@9W8WCJK6mos6MO
Yes, but only with decreases in costs for public transportation and trains, and an increase in bike lanes etc. (easier access to alternative options)
@9VZT3KK6mos6MO
No, but we should have better public transportation leading to those areas to encourage using it over driving.
@9VJX3226mos6MO
Only if public transportation is really effective in the surrounding area
@carsonmyers 7mos7MO
Yes, but cities must complement fees with easy access using alternative means of transit
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Do you think it's fair to charge drivers more for using crowded streets if it could help the environment? Why or why not?
@9TQWX6J 7mos7MO
no, trying to change an industry from the consumer end is akin to steering a ship by leaning
@9RZPX678mos8MO
no, cities should do better to meet growing infrastructure requirements than taxing current citizens for the growing needs.
@9RBSHWJ9mos9MO
Yes, but only if robust public transportation options are available.
@9QW7TQZ9mos9MO
Yes, and create more spaces where cars are not allowed at all.
@9P4BK5L10mos10MO
It would depend on how it is implemented, what routes are affected etc.
@9NXR2CN10mos10MO
No, instead, build better and more efficient transport infrastructure
@9RVCYVN8mos8MO
No, unless massive investments in public transit are made
Yes but only if the city has an adequate, reliable and affordable public transit system.
@9RBY87R9mos9MO
No, the citizens should not be punished for poorly designed roadways
@9RBWQPY9mos9MO
Build up and stop sprawl. Then people will walk and bike and not use vehicles to congest the roads.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@9ZK3JNS5mos5MO
No, provide more public transportation and incentives for people who use public transportation to reduce traffic congestion.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
