Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Yes
@9YLQXQJ2wks2W
We don't have sufficient understanding to be playing with hundreds of thousands of years of evolution.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
No
@9T878LK2mos2MO
Don't do it. God made us the way we are in His image and to change that would be basically saying the the Lord of the universe didn't do a good enough job.
@9YJQM5LNew Democratic2wks2W
as long as they can be held accountable with fail safes put into place as it is a slippery slope into eugenics territory
@9YJ9C4Y2wks2W
It’s a thin line. Lots of rules would have to be set in place for using this kind of thing for me to feel comfortable about the idea.
@9WW3GTH4wks4W
It depends on what is being considered a disease. Considering homosexuality was classified as a disease not too long ago, it seems like too much of a blanket term to be in usage for genetic prevention.
@9WC23621mo1MO
Yes, as long as the advancements are thoroughly tested and verified to be free of long term negative side effects
well any government cannot be trusted at any level about medical research since we all know who finances all this...
@9W8GJCB1mo1MO
To the highest degree, this is an extremely important issue with keeping people alive and preventing possible biological warfare.
Yes, make it as long as one’s life can ever last. A democracy to quality humans leads to a greater future of humanity in Canada’s society.
@9VVGC591mo1MO
No, we should not open the pandora's box to modifying DNA which can have harmful social implications in the future
@9VPGGY4New Democratic1mo1MO
We should ask more ethical questions before going full steak ahead. Ask more philosophical and ethical questions
@9VJZTNPConservative2mos2MO
Yes, but only if they companies provide yearly breakdowns of where the funds are going. After 5 years if they don't provide any (proven) improvements, funding stops.
Yes, but how will this affect the economy? And how will the government respond to something like this?
@9V2YV4B2mos2MO
No, I don’t want the government funding things, but genetic engineering is cool and fun. Plus, who knows? Maybe we get a superhero out of it!
@9TV8XFS2mos2MO
Yes, we should fund more research. But the government should watch over the research. To ensure it is happening ethically
@9TT85JL2mos2MO
This question is vague. Genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment is different in terms of whether it’s done on humans, crops or food.
@9TR533J2mos2MO
Yes, but it should be strictly reserved to medicinal use and exclude all meddling in reproduction and human cloning
@9TMMVLNNew Democratic2mos2MO
I would say yes to some extent as long as it's for a preventional reason like for instance preventing a deadly disease that affects the whole society not on just a handful on people..
@9T9YZJH2mos2MO
No, but in the future, if diseases like monkey pox was to reach a covid 19 level of concern, then I would want that a top priority.
@9T8X5WB2mos2MO
Only for specific diseases such as alzheimers, dementia, etc. i would not support funding research into getting rid of people with autism or down syndrome.
@9QNDV5PRhinoceros5mos5MO
They have to be VERY VERY VERY careful when they do it but it can save lives and somebody is going to do it eventually so yes
Yes, but only if The research organization takes the best interests of the country into account And is unbiased
@9RZPX673mos3MO
no, that is nothing but neo eugenics, a neo nazi school of thought, which our government and forefathers disagree with/ died protecting against
@9RC2QHKNew Democratic4mos4MO
Yes, Excepting that our government correctly uses peer reviewed research that identifies diseases and the likes.
@9P965MFConservative5mos5MO
I believe it is important, however, there are other pressing matters that I think the government should invest more money in.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.