A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Yes
@9YLQXQJ2wks2W
The existing system of a social insurance number is sufficient. Minor changes to the amount of data tied to the SIN might be reasonable.
@9ZBHJJN2wks2W
Doesn't this technically already exist with the Social Insurance Numbers, and Health numbers, + Passports and stuff?
@9YKXF762wks2W
as long as its only used on people who have had their identity grabbed and has strict limits to who and when its used
@9W9YG5K1mo1MO
Leave it to the provinces, and allow each resident to choose the level of security of their ID. Give several options and decentralize, as this is safer.
@9W9M54X1mo1MO
Yes however I struggle to see how this could be done without there being invasion of privacy, and this issue should be further discussed before implementing anything.
@9W6Y4BF1mo1MO
I believe it could be good in high-security places however this can also lead to some serious problems if these data files are ever hacked.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
In your opinion, does the convenience of having a single national ID outweigh the potential risks to your privacy?
@9TMR89C 2mos2MO
I have no trustworthy information on this matter. I apologize for not having a response.
@9X97M663wks3W
I think we should on high profile people or people with many complaints but overall have privacy for other people
@9WTF59R4wks4W
No because the odds of that information being given to other countries is pretty high. I’d say yes if I believed Canada could keep the information to itself
@9WSS4QB4wks4W
Yes, only if there is a supervised system to ensure the government does not infringe on individual freedoms. Watch the Watcher.
@9PDLKNJ5mos5MO
That already exists. It's called a social insurance number.
@9TZKMBH2mos2MO
Yes and no. There should be privacy, but it could be good to have better surveilence in order to help prevent crimes.
@9TTFZM4New Democratic2mos2MO
The only thing that would validate this level of "police State" would be prioritized crime.
Using this to eliminate scammers across every market would be the correct way to use this.
Using this to identify and punish people for stealing bread from corporate grocery stores is the incorrect way to use this.
Surveillance must be strictly for benevolence.
@9T8FDXG2mos2MO
No. People should instead be educated on how to protect their information themselves. as well as what to do if your information is taken.
@9SVZPQP3mos3MO
No, but certain websites could add a government initiated prompt that asks for the last few digits of your SIN for identification when necessary
@9SVW64D3mos3MO
Yes but I’m some sense it feels like we would lose privacy and feels like a utopian controlling society which I don’t like the vibe of
@9STLJ7BNew Democratic3mos3MO
Yes, But there should be still some anonymity as there should be some measures to protect people's identities
If convicted of fraud then this should lead to an automated increase in monitoring of those convicted
@9SGZSK73mos3MO
If someone is shown to have done a crime it should be heavily rechecked by HUMANS to make sure they have actually done it and are not falsely accused.
@9S9R2T43mos3MO
This is a slippery slope. If you want to live like China, do it you want a free system? Wish to use your freedom of speech do not do this.
@9RZPX673mos3MO
given our current incidences of foreign interference, yes all MPs and MLAs should submit to an ID system that weeds out fraud and foreign interference
@9RYSY2B4mos4MO
I believe there should be a identification structure in place for security and safety but have certain regulations in place in order to prevent spying and other un ethical actions.
@9QQHX9L5mos5MO
I belive that the Government should not implemnet a national identification system because as hacker increasingly improve there is no safety on the internet. They would have access to all identification of citezens.
@9ZPKL9L22hrs22H
This depends on the ways that they would want to implement the identification. I don't think they should take away privacy and stalk people by using facial recognition. But, if it is a safe and sane way to prevent fraud, and other things of the like, I think it might be a good idea.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@9ZQ63PS8hrs8H
Yes a national security system should be implemented so long as it’s not singing like chipping everyone but the facial recognition is fine.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.