A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
Yes
@9YLQXQJ4mos4MO
The existing system of a social insurance number is sufficient. Minor changes to the amount of data tied to the SIN might be reasonable.
@B2ST4SY1mo1MO
we already have a standardized ID in ontario it is our social inssurance number or the SIN card. this does not stope someone from stealing your identaty as all they would need is that number and they have all of your information from the time your born to when it was taken. I do not bielve this is a good idea as all it would do is give another way for identaties to be stolen
@B2H5CG62mos2MO
No, because often times identification systems are used to reinforce inequality and we already have ways of identifying ourselves
@B2H27FG2mos2MO
No, we already have health care ID, drivers license ID, shool # ID.Start identify those who are non citizens coming in.
@B2GG52P2mos2MO
We already have a national identity system. Residents and Citizens of Canada have SIN numbers to identify themselves with the government.
@9PDLKNJ9mos9MO
That already exists. It's called a social insurance number.
@B393GKS2wks2W
i think we should have a single form if identification that begins at birth. then things like a drivers licence, health card etc can be added to this as needed. we have way too many ids now and its a waste of taxpayers money
@B36R5TY2wks2W
Yes, but this system should only be exercised to a certain extent to maintain a sense of privacy within every citizen. Security is crucial in society as well as fraud prevention, but so is the privacy of every citizen
@B34QTLR3wks3W
No, because the identification system could be leaked into other countries, allowing Canada to become increasingly vulnerable to its opponents.
@B32CB8K3wks3W
Yes but not something that completely invades the privacy of others such as id chips in their bodies more like a fingerprint database or something.
@B2W38R61mo1MO
We should be able to create a system that protects against identity theft that doesn't allow access the government and ALL their employees our all our personal and private information.
@B2TKP2Q1mo1MO
Rather than enforcing the system, it should be an option for those who want to protect their privacy and those who want to enhance their own security.
@B2SX7XJ1mo1MO
Everyone should have a nationally accepted photo id that is the basis for all identification needs. Medicare, SIN, drivers license should all be on a one card document.
@B2BMK7B2mos2MO
Yes, provided it is properly managed, there is strong accountability measures, & there are no loopholes.
@B2J775M2mos2MO
Yes, provided that it cannot be used as a social credit score that limits my rights and freedoms as a Canadian citizen
@B2HDJR32mos2MO
Yes, provide that it cannot be used as social credit score that limits my rights and freedoms as a Canadian citizen
@B2C6DMVConservative2mos2MO
There should be tracking systems for fraud accounts but they should not infringe on any personal info not required
@B2BNJSD2mos2MO
While having a standardized ID system could be beneficial to prevent such measures, I find that it compromises the freedom and privacy on oneself. Another problem would be if this would be EVEN successful at all? People could come up with all sort of ways to get around it.
@9W9YG5K5mos5MO
Leave it to the provinces, and allow each resident to choose the level of security of their ID. Give several options and decentralize, as this is safer.
@9W9M54X5mos5MO
Yes however I struggle to see how this could be done without there being invasion of privacy, and this issue should be further discussed before implementing anything.
@9W6Y4BF5mos5MO
I believe it could be good in high-security places however this can also lead to some serious problems if these data files are ever hacked.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
In your opinion, does the convenience of having a single national ID outweigh the potential risks to your privacy?
@9TMR89C 6mos6MO
I have no trustworthy information on this matter. I apologize for not having a response.
@9S9R2T47mos7MO
This is a slippery slope. If you want to live like China, do it you want a free system? Wish to use your freedom of speech do not do this.
@9RZPX677mos7MO
given our current incidences of foreign interference, yes all MPs and MLAs should submit to an ID system that weeds out fraud and foreign interference
@9RYSY2B7mos7MO
I believe there should be a identification structure in place for security and safety but have certain regulations in place in order to prevent spying and other un ethical actions.
@9QQHX9L8mos8MO
I belive that the Government should not implemnet a national identification system because as hacker increasingly improve there is no safety on the internet. They would have access to all identification of citezens.
@B23CRQ33mos3MO
Only after ensuring this will not lead to wrongful convictions and place an independent monitor to ensure this.
@9ZZ4NW63mos3MO
It depends on how good the ID system is and if the government can make it efficient for people to use. Do they also have enough money for this? I think there needs to put more thought into it as it is a big thing and can effect the whole country extremely.
@9ZSBTLP3mos3MO
Maybe but it would take lots of resources and would need a lot of money and work to do before it's complete, and there could be mistakes, it could get broken which would need repair, and ect.
@9ZQ63PS4mos4MO
Yes a national security system should be implemented so long as it’s not singing like chipping everyone but the facial recognition is fine.
@9ZPKL9L4mos4MO
This depends on the ways that they would want to implement the identification. I don't think they should take away privacy and stalk people by using facial recognition. But, if it is a safe and sane way to prevent fraud, and other things of the like, I think it might be a good idea.
@9ZBHJJN4mos4MO
Doesn't this technically already exist with the Social Insurance Numbers, and Health numbers, + Passports and stuff?
@9YKXF764mos4MO
as long as its only used on people who have had their identity grabbed and has strict limits to who and when its used
@9X97M664mos4MO
I think we should on high profile people or people with many complaints but overall have privacy for other people
@9WTF59R5mos5MO
No because the odds of that information being given to other countries is pretty high. I’d say yes if I believed Canada could keep the information to itself
@9WSS4QB5mos5MO
Yes, only if there is a supervised system to ensure the government does not infringe on individual freedoms. Watch the Watcher.
@9TZKMBH6mos6MO
Yes and no. There should be privacy, but it could be good to have better surveilence in order to help prevent crimes.
@9TTFZM4New Democratic6mos6MO
The only thing that would validate this level of "police State" would be prioritized crime.
Using this to eliminate scammers across every market would be the correct way to use this.
Using this to identify and punish people for stealing bread from corporate grocery stores is the incorrect way to use this.
Surveillance must be strictly for benevolence.
@9T8FDXG6mos6MO
No. People should instead be educated on how to protect their information themselves. as well as what to do if your information is taken.
@9SVZPQP6mos6MO
No, but certain websites could add a government initiated prompt that asks for the last few digits of your SIN for identification when necessary
@9SVW64D6mos6MO
Yes but I’m some sense it feels like we would lose privacy and feels like a utopian controlling society which I don’t like the vibe of
@9STLJ7BNew Democratic6mos6MO
Yes, But there should be still some anonymity as there should be some measures to protect people's identities
If convicted of fraud then this should lead to an automated increase in monitoring of those convicted
@9SGZSK77mos7MO
If someone is shown to have done a crime it should be heavily rechecked by HUMANS to make sure they have actually done it and are not falsely accused.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.