Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

37 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6mos6MO

Yes

 @9YLQXQJfrom Newfoundland  disagreed…2wks2W

The existing system of a social insurance number is sufficient. Minor changes to the amount of data tied to the SIN might be reasonable.

 @9ZBHJJNfrom British Columbia  answered…2wks2W

Doesn't this technically already exist with the Social Insurance Numbers, and Health numbers, + Passports and stuff?

 @9YKXF76from New Brunswick  answered…2wks2W

as long as its only used on people who have had their identity grabbed and has strict limits to who and when its used

 @9W9YG5Kfrom Nova Scotia  answered…1mo1MO

Leave it to the provinces, and allow each resident to choose the level of security of their ID. Give several options and decentralize, as this is safer.

 @9W9M54Xfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Yes however I struggle to see how this could be done without there being invasion of privacy, and this issue should be further discussed before implementing anything.

 @9W6Y4BFfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

I believe it could be good in high-security places however this can also lead to some serious problems if these data files are ever hacked.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

In your opinion, does the convenience of having a single national ID outweigh the potential risks to your privacy?

 @9TMR89C from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

I have no trustworthy information on this matter. I apologize for not having a response.

 @9X97M66from Nova Scotia  answered…3wks3W

I think we should on high profile people or people with many complaints but overall have privacy for other people

 @9WTF59Rfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

No because the odds of that information being given to other countries is pretty high. I’d say yes if I believed Canada could keep the information to itself

 @9WSS4QBfrom Ontario  answered…4wks4W

Yes, only if there is a supervised system to ensure the government does not infringe on individual freedoms. Watch the Watcher.

 @9PDLKNJfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

 @9TZKMBHfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes and no. There should be privacy, but it could be good to have better surveilence in order to help prevent crimes.

 @9TTFZM4New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

The only thing that would validate this level of "police State" would be prioritized crime.

Using this to eliminate scammers across every market would be the correct way to use this.

Using this to identify and punish people for stealing bread from corporate grocery stores is the incorrect way to use this.

Surveillance must be strictly for benevolence.

 @9T8FDXGfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

No. People should instead be educated on how to protect their information themselves. as well as what to do if your information is taken.

 @9SVZPQPfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

No, but certain websites could add a government initiated prompt that asks for the last few digits of your SIN for identification when necessary

 @9SVW64Dfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes but I’m some sense it feels like we would lose privacy and feels like a utopian controlling society which I don’t like the vibe of

 @9STLJ7BNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, But there should be still some anonymity as there should be some measures to protect people's identities

 @9SHGX5QLiberalfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3mos3MO

If convicted of fraud then this should lead to an automated increase in monitoring of those convicted

 @9SGZSK7from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

If someone is shown to have done a crime it should be heavily rechecked by HUMANS to make sure they have actually done it and are not falsely accused.

 @9S9R2T4from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

This is a slippery slope. If you want to live like China, do it you want a free system? Wish to use your freedom of speech do not do this.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

given our current incidences of foreign interference, yes all MPs and MLAs should submit to an ID system that weeds out fraud and foreign interference

 @9RYSY2Bfrom British Columbia  answered…4mos4MO

I believe there should be a identification structure in place for security and safety but have certain regulations in place in order to prevent spying and other un ethical actions.

 @9QQHX9Lfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

I belive that the Government should not implemnet a national identification system because as hacker increasingly improve there is no safety on the internet. They would have access to all identification of citezens.

 @9ZPKL9Lfrom Ontario  answered…22hrs22H

This depends on the ways that they would want to implement the identification. I don't think they should take away privacy and stalk people by using facial recognition. But, if it is a safe and sane way to prevent fraud, and other things of the like, I think it might be a good idea.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Do you trust the government to keep your personal information safe if it centralizes all citizen data into one system?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Can a system that tracks and stores your information ever truly be secure from misuse or hacking?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Does a national identification system give the government too much influence over its citizens, or is it simply an efficient tool for organizing society?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How might a digital ID affect your sense of personal freedom or privacy in your daily life?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

From your perspective, what are the benefits or dangers of a system that could potentially link your medical records, social media history, and job applications to one ID card?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would your opinion of a national ID system change if you knew it could help law enforcement catch criminals but also potentially monitor innocent people?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Would it bother you if every time you accessed a service, people could track your actions and movements through a single ID?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How do you think the introduction of a mandatory ID system would impact those who are marginalized or living in vulnerable positions in society?

 @9ZQ63PSfrom Alberta  answered…8hrs8H

Yes a national security system should be implemented so long as it’s not singing like chipping everyone but the facial recognition is fine.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you feel about presenting one ID that connects all your personal information for any service you use?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...