Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Yes
@9VJPP2SConservative6mos6MO
Canada supposedly isn't rasict,right well they should accept qualified people from any and all countries.Exceptions should be made for people from enemy nations because the government can exploit it to plant spies and such.
@B4KXZZV1 day1D
There is a responsibility to screen immigrants without doubt but that shouldn't ban an entire population that meet the existing criteria
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
No
@9VJPP2SConservative6mos6MO
Immigration doesn't increase crime: "https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/does-immigration-really-increase-crime-347099 " whether you like it or not. Keep in mind that a large share of immigrants are from high risk countries such as: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and even Arab nations such as: Lebanon, Syria and Yemen etc. all of which are high risk countries! I do believe that only qualified people should come, though.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
If you had to make a decision about who gets into a country, what factors would you think are most important to consider?
-If there country is safe for them to stay in
-If they are criminals
-If they are educated
-If they have family in the country they are trying to enter
-If they speak the language of the country they are trying to get into
@9Y9MXMC5mos5MO
Current inter country relations. Dont want sleeper agents or dual loyalty in case of war. That can destroy the country from inside out
@9XYC3PV5mos5MO
I believe that we should be choose the best of the best in terms of academics and economics. Moving here should be a privilege and not a right. If someone can come here and contribute, welcome them with open arms.
@9XJDXXW5mos5MO
A factor would be an openness to culture shift. We are secular, progressive society which can be a culture shock.
@9MR9VHJ11mos11MO
no, but measures should be taken screen out potential terrorists.
@B3DB5PQ1mo1MO
No, screening should be the same for everyone. Terrorists can potentially come from anywhere (or be born and raised here)
@B4HZSYNConservative3 days3D
No, but regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens and did not commit a serious crime
@B4HBP9D4 days4D
most individuals from such countries are harmless and are trying to escape from the danger. mass imigration shouldn't be allowed, but banning them completely puts more peopple in danger
@B4GS4BJNew Democratic5 days5D
Yes, but once the screening is in place, we should allow them if they pass, because they are people just like you and I
@B4GC5JJ6 days6D
They should be isolated if it is shown they are a threat and only fully let into the country once proven they aren’t a threat
@B4F8HHZ1wk1W
I think that people from high risk countries should go through a higher screening process, but not be banned completely.
@B4C9KRT1wk1W
One bad apple doesn't spoil the whole bunch, but there should be some tight checks for all immigrants especially those determined to be high risk
@B4BH7Y82wks2W
Banning them how?let them come but monitor them closely with ankle bracelet or something until they are cleared. They shouldn't be left to rot in a dangerous country.
@B4BF3T32wks2W
What are you defining as a high risk country ? It is individuals who may be deemed high risk based on criteria for screening no matter what country they are from. So the government many need to improve its screening processes overall.
@B49YZG32wks2W
There should be proper vetting to make sure that the immigrants entering the country are not terrorists, but there are so many people from those countries that deserve and need safety and protection
@B48QZQQ2wks2W
They should be allowed to seek aid if they are from high risk countries and their livelihood shouldn’t depend on the lack of screening from the government
@B486HPFConservative2wks2W
We shouldn’t be opening the floodgates to anybody. We need to attract doctors, lawyers, engineers, trades people that can compliment our workforce and create a better place for Canada.
@B46XS562wks2W
Should be on a case by case basis as every person has a different background and may need to leave their home country and they don’t have ill intent
@B46DY7T2wks2W
No, but we need stricter regulations to prevent terrorists from entering. Asylum seekers should not be punished for our governments failures.
@B445BPHConservative3wks3W
Filtering Terrorists is important but banning people from those countries is discriminatory and should be illegal.
@B4443RG3wks3W
There could be people trying to escape terrorist. There should be some type of process put into place where they have to be properly background checked as much as possible and follow ups for a period of time, but not overly intrusive
it depends it could be a life and death situation and screening could have benefits and also threats
@B3YW9624wks4W
Yes, and the border should be closed and all immigrants should be deported, even the people with citizenship, and their families.
@B3YMXQ2New Democratic4wks4W
Is the government not already sufficient at screening potential threats? I would need to see evidence that their screening is not working well enough in order to consider a total ban on immigrants from high risk countries.
@B3VGR9S4wks4W
No please there should be no immigrants coming into our country because their are barely that much available jobs in Canada only some immigrants like phillippines and no west indians also vietnamese people are allowed
@B3VDTYG4wks4W
The question is too vague. i don't think everyone should be fully banned until the screening is improved but i do think they should drastically lower the amount admitted through during the improvements.
@B3MT79L1mo1MO
I think the system should look into the background of the individual trying to immigrate, instead of making their decision based on nationality
@B3K9X781mo1MO
Proper screening and determining should be made to prevent that from happening with reliable experts to showcase the difference between a refugee, terrorist or spy for the average person.
@B3J8PMG1mo1MO
No, immigrants from high risk countries are already screened for links to serious crimes and terrorism
@B3J7FXQConservative1mo1MO
We should allow immigrants in who share the same societal values as us, and who have the same respect for equality and humanity as us.
@B3H825K1mo1MO
No, as long as the immigrants are qualified people, they should be allowed in. The country they immigrate from does not entirely mean the immigrant is of that behavior.
@B3H57NN1mo1MO
No, but they need to improve on this much more. I believe they need to do extra on someone who they may suspect is a terrorist, but should still allow people from high risk countries.
I think it depends on circumstances and if there’s a way to screen more then we should do that first
I don't think refugees should be banned in a crisis situation when we don't have a policy in place to screen out potential terrorists. If someone is in trouble and we have the means to help them in any way, we should try. I wonder if there could some sort of solution where they are relocated to certain areas until a more thorough screening can be done?
I believe we have to only because Canada is not in a proper state to help others. We need to improve ourselves internally before being able to offer help.
@B3FC9K91mo1MO
I don’t think banishment from the country is the best approach. I think if the government is taking their time to screen for potential threats, then it may take someone longer to get into the country. I think they should be aloud to visit if they have a passport.
@B3F2G6X 1mo1MO
No, but background checks before entering and monitoring once here is a small price to pay for gaining a safe haven. We have to protect our citizens too.
@B3DKPM21mo1MO
Dont ban them from entering but get the government to improve its ability to screen out potential terrorists
@B3DKFHC1mo1MO
No, Canada should strengthen screening and intelligence sharing without discriminating based on nationality and monitor individuals based on behaviour and risk factors as well.
@B3DJ9WY1mo1MO
No because refugees are usually from high risk countries and it's dangerous for them not to leave their country
@B3D84CL1mo1MO
NO, if they commit a crime and hurt civilians we know we did not discriminate them and they made the decisions to hurt people.
@B3B52532mos2MO
Maybe this would be useful but it could be bad for people who have problematic backgrounds that may not have done anything to bad
With better screening, immigrants from high risk countries may be trying to escape persecution and need our protection.
@B38K4D7Independent 2mos2MO
No. That's tough and can become sketchy. I mean banned would prevent refugees from coming in due to war/etc. I don't think that is right. But immigration, specifically should be regulated securely and in-depth. So...refugee exception, and more regulations/security for typical immigration.
@B385BNF 2mos2MO
All immigrants should be first screened for not only criminal background but also their involvement in fraud or corruption (e.g. Faked qualification documents)
@B37ZK3K2mos2MO
No we shouldn’t bar an entire country for the actions of internal parties afar, but should have more countermeasures to make sure it’s safe
No banned, but limited until the government improves their screening abilities. Which should be tackled by increasing funding to the facilities that process immigrants. As those facilities are very under staffed and are back logged several years.
@B36YN722mos2MO
Not banned, but limited or highly screened. Also more funding should be allocated to facilities processing imigrants.
@B36TLNW2mos2MO
Everyone should be treated equally but if they have a criminal background then they should not be let in.
@B36LMM72mos2MO
A test should be made to ensure that efficient workers and not people without resources enter. And they should be watched closely for the first 6 months
@B35MPHB2mos2MO
No! I've seen how this has played out with people trying to escape the carnage in Gaza and it's horrifying, how Canada has handled/ bungled things. "Terrorists" can be homegrown too, and if you take away someone's reason for fighting, most of the time, they'll stop trying to get their point across violently.
@B34VRMK2mos2MO
Depends, higher screening and stricter process would be ideal for this. We still want the people who need help to have somewhere to go though.
@B3288T22mos2MO
I don't think we should necessarily ban all immigrants from hight risk countries, but rather have lots of security checks
@B2ZJH9G2mos2MO
no because it would be wrong to assume they are all terrorists simply just heavily watch over the immigrant for the first few months of immigration
@B2Z3P2C2mos2MO
I don’t think banning and exclusion are good solutions. There are families that would be disconnected. Not all people are bad people.
@B2XJ5FGConservative2mos2MO
they should never be allowed he at all if they are they are watched over by security for at least 5 years minimum to ensure the saftey of the country
@B2X8V2K2mos2MO
No, It should be regulated, and monitored but if it's an issue of safety then there should be a few exceptions.
@B2X863R2mos2MO
No, but only fully vetted applicants should be admitted. Sometimes, families are running for their lives, we need to help when we can.
@B2WYH382mos2MO
depends you can still help immigrants out but box them out before they enter Canada to make sure they are not affiliated with terrorists or have connections with them or cause a threat
@B2VR8MG2mos2MO
This seems a touch racist. shouldnt the governemnt already have impecable abilities to screen out terrorists from anyb and all countries not just high risk countries. this shouldnt be a factor in immigration as this should be considered basic standards for letting anyone in the country
@B2SLJ7Y2mos2MO
They should not be banned, but a thorough review should be done of each individual before they are let into the country, with any risk being denied
@9ZQV5PZ5mos5MO
Yes, but "high risk" should be used sparingly so as to avoid exhausting border control and immigration officers with overwork and over-vigilance
@9ZNLDFL5mos5MO
they shouldnt be banned from countries if they come for a high risk place as it not their fault as to where they may have grew up
@9ZMYJ4P5mos5MO
Regardless of screening, citizens of dangerous and terroristic nations will not be allowed into Canada. If there ever is a calm period in for example the Middle East, we will allow people from that area into Canada again. If they wish to enter as Refugees, they will undergo strict screening processes.
@9ZMRC285mos5MO
We need an intensive screening process into the individual to determine if they are a threat. We cannot generalize someone based on their ethnic origins
@9ZLJD8L5mos5MO
I believe we should do a big back round check because some people from those areas that are in trouble may need to come in, but make it strict
@9ZJ9LJW5mos5MO
No, as long as thorough search is done when entering the country to ensure the person is not a terrorist
@9ZJ52HDNew Democratic5mos5MO
I think they may need to receive tighter security measures to make sure Canada stays safe, but at the same time I don't think we should banned them because some of them may be leaving to find a safe place outside of their country.
It is unfair for us to correlate all immigrants from high risk countries as potential terrorists as they may be trying to leave and build a better life.
@9ZGPP6M5mos5MO
I believe that all people who are not born canadians should be screened thoroughly but also remain within the human rights.
@9ZF4M8J5mos5MO
I think the risks of terrorists are much lower than the actual damage done to people waiting to enter the country- government works at a glacial pace
@9Z96WJWIndependent5mos5MO
The government should focus strongly on improving the ability to screen for terrorism quickly to allow real refugees safety
@9YNQFHTNew Democratic5mos5MO
If they can pass a criminal background check and ensure no ties to terrorist activity, there is no reason to deny someone just because they are from a “high risk” country.
@9YMQZBK5mos5MO
Yes, but the immigrants should be granted a safe place to live, because what if they are refugees attempting to escape the terrorists?
@9YM457QNew Democratic 5mos5MO
No, immigrants should be screened on an individual basis and not discriminated against based on their country of origin
@9YLC4FD5mos5MO
Hard question. Strict background checks need to be done but everyone deserves the chance especially when from a high-risk country
@9YKHL3B5mos5MO
Rather then letting immigrants in to Canada we should be working on increasing job opportunities and housing first
@9WZ29T65mos5MO
Immigrants should be screened normally, even from high risk countries. Screening should be the same with all.
@9WT7VJH6mos6MO
The government should do very extensive physicological tests to ensure they are not terrorists. And allow all those who pass.
@9WPPMKFRhinoceros6mos6MO
No, people may need a safe place to go, we can always judge people for their actions once they enter the country, and detain any suspicious person(s).
@9W68V6N6mos6MO
Hard to say. Not everyone is bad just because they’re from a high risk country. The screening process should be performed on everyone from said countries however rotated through and have “surprise” aspects to it so these said “terrorists” can’t learn and memorize the testing / screening process.
@9VZNCFG6mos6MO
I think that they should be allowed into Canada, but they should be allowed to only be somewhere remote or away from a big population until proven innocent.
@9VHWJLTNew Democratic6mos6MO
High risk countries should be looked at on a context, case by case scenario. Perhaps an officer like a parole officer would be able to invigilate those individuals.
@9VHMKHM6mos6MO
If the person has a high risk of the terrorists coming for them then there should be some regulations
@9RKDWR49mos9MO
I don’t support outright banning them, but security measures should definitely be taken
@9RGCB9P9mos9MO
Not banned, but ensure they aren’t coming to Canada prior to this being done.
@9RCRJ4F9mos9MO
Look at high-risk individuals, not high risk countries. If the issue was high-risk countries, we shouldn’t be letting anyone in from the USA right now.
@9RBVDVT9mos9MO
No, but enhance the screening process prior to entry.
@9QQGGYJ9mos9MO
Don't ban them, put them in a safe place while you screen them, and deport them if they are high risk
absolutely if it means protecting there country and people
@9M3PSVWConservative11mos11MO
If they refugees, you can let them in if they pass a specific test.
@9JXW8SV1yr1Y
instead of being banned, i think we should run intense background checks of the individuals who are entering the country.
@9JXR49B1yr1Y
They should not be banned, but there should be thorough investigation before they are allowed in.
@9JXFQRR 1yr1Y
Yes, but refuges should still be allowed to enter.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.