Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Yes
@9VJPP2SConservative2mos2MO
Canada supposedly isn't rasict,right well they should accept qualified people from any and all countries.Exceptions should be made for people from enemy nations because the government can exploit it to plant spies and such.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
No
@9VJPP2SConservative2mos2MO
Immigration doesn't increase crime: "https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/does-immigration-really-increase-crime-347099 " whether you like it or not. Keep in mind that a large share of immigrants are from high risk countries such as: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and even Arab nations such as: Lebanon, Syria and Yemen etc. all of which are high risk countries! I do believe that only qualified people should come, though.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
If you had to make a decision about who gets into a country, what factors would you think are most important to consider?
-If there country is safe for them to stay in
-If they are criminals
-If they are educated
-If they have family in the country they are trying to enter
-If they speak the language of the country they are trying to get into
@9Y9MXMC2wks2W
Current inter country relations. Dont want sleeper agents or dual loyalty in case of war. That can destroy the country from inside out
@9XYC3PV2wks2W
I believe that we should be choose the best of the best in terms of academics and economics. Moving here should be a privilege and not a right. If someone can come here and contribute, welcome them with open arms.
@9XJDXXW3wks3W
A factor would be an openness to culture shift. We are secular, progressive society which can be a culture shock.
@9MR9VHJ6mos6MO
no, but measures should be taken screen out potential terrorists.
@9ZNLDFL2 days2D
they shouldnt be banned from countries if they come for a high risk place as it not their fault as to where they may have grew up
@9ZMYJ4P3 days3D
Regardless of screening, citizens of dangerous and terroristic nations will not be allowed into Canada. If there ever is a calm period in for example the Middle East, we will allow people from that area into Canada again. If they wish to enter as Refugees, they will undergo strict screening processes.
@9ZMRC283 days3D
We need an intensive screening process into the individual to determine if they are a threat. We cannot generalize someone based on their ethnic origins
@9ZLJD8L6 days6D
I believe we should do a big back round check because some people from those areas that are in trouble may need to come in, but make it strict
@9ZJ9LJW1wk1W
No, as long as thorough search is done when entering the country to ensure the person is not a terrorist
I think they may need to receive tighter security measures to make sure Canada stays safe, but at the same time I don't think we should banned them because some of them may be leaving to find a safe place outside of their country.
It is unfair for us to correlate all immigrants from high risk countries as potential terrorists as they may be trying to leave and build a better life.
@9ZGPP6M1wk1W
I believe that all people who are not born canadians should be screened thoroughly but also remain within the human rights.
@9ZF4M8J1wk1W
I think the risks of terrorists are much lower than the actual damage done to people waiting to enter the country- government works at a glacial pace
@9Z96WJWIndependent2wks2W
The government should focus strongly on improving the ability to screen for terrorism quickly to allow real refugees safety
@9YNQFHTNew Democratic2wks2W
If they can pass a criminal background check and ensure no ties to terrorist activity, there is no reason to deny someone just because they are from a “high risk” country.
@9YMQZBK2wks2W
Yes, but the immigrants should be granted a safe place to live, because what if they are refugees attempting to escape the terrorists?
@9YM457QNew Democratic 2wks2W
No, immigrants should be screened on an individual basis and not discriminated against based on their country of origin
@9YLC4FD2wks2W
Hard question. Strict background checks need to be done but everyone deserves the chance especially when from a high-risk country
@9YKHL3B2wks2W
Rather then letting immigrants in to Canada we should be working on increasing job opportunities and housing first
@9WZ29T63wks3W
Immigrants should be screened normally, even from high risk countries. Screening should be the same with all.
@9WT7VJH4wks4W
The government should do very extensive physicological tests to ensure they are not terrorists. And allow all those who pass.
@9WPPMKFRhinoceros4wks4W
No, people may need a safe place to go, we can always judge people for their actions once they enter the country, and detain any suspicious person(s).
@9W68V6N1mo1MO
Hard to say. Not everyone is bad just because they’re from a high risk country. The screening process should be performed on everyone from said countries however rotated through and have “surprise” aspects to it so these said “terrorists” can’t learn and memorize the testing / screening process.
@9VZNCFG1mo1MO
I think that they should be allowed into Canada, but they should be allowed to only be somewhere remote or away from a big population until proven innocent.
@9VHWJLTNew Democratic2mos2MO
High risk countries should be looked at on a context, case by case scenario. Perhaps an officer like a parole officer would be able to invigilate those individuals.
@9VHMKHM2mos2MO
If the person has a high risk of the terrorists coming for them then there should be some regulations
@9RKDWR44mos4MO
I don’t support outright banning them, but security measures should definitely be taken
@9RGCB9P4mos4MO
Not banned, but ensure they aren’t coming to Canada prior to this being done.
@9RCRJ4F4mos4MO
Look at high-risk individuals, not high risk countries. If the issue was high-risk countries, we shouldn’t be letting anyone in from the USA right now.
@9RBVDVT4mos4MO
No, but enhance the screening process prior to entry.
@9QQGGYJ5mos5MO
Don't ban them, put them in a safe place while you screen them, and deport them if they are high risk
absolutely if it means protecting there country and people
@9M3PSVWConservative7mos7MO
If they refugees, you can let them in if they pass a specific test.
@9JXW8SV9mos9MO
instead of being banned, i think we should run intense background checks of the individuals who are entering the country.
@9JXR49B9mos9MO
They should not be banned, but there should be thorough investigation before they are allowed in.
@9JXFQRR 9mos9MO
Yes, but refuges should still be allowed to enter.
@9JWWFBK9mos9MO
We should speed up the improvement in screening - banning has too many negative impacts
@9JQ8T5J10mos10MO
No, but ensure they pass the background checks & do not have a history of committing serious crimes.
@9JJJ7GS10mos10MO
not banned. could be people wanting to flee those conditions. However special vetting is needed to ensure they are not going to be a national thereat
@9J5H48T10mos10MO
Put equal effort into understanding domestic terrorism from non minority groups
@9J233ZK10mos10MO
Depends if Canada has a strained relation ship with that country such as Iran
@9HYTRSF11mos11MO
Keep a close eye on them if they are to stay in Canada
@9HLHBSS11mos11MO
No, but subject them to more stringent vetting procedures
@9H6XNKXConservative12mos12MO
No. I don’t trust the government to assess what a “high risk country” would be.
@9H6458512mos12MO
That’s discrimination based on their nation of origin.
@9H26K8S1yr1Y
No, but I still think that improving the ability to screen potential terrorists is a smart idea.
@9GZYG4J1yr1Y
Yes, regardless whether the government improves its ability to screen out potential Threat or not.
@9TFK7JC2mos2MO
I think that they should not be banned but things like background checks should be mandatory because you cant just ban someone from a high rick country by Assuming
@9TBHZJ72mos2MO
No, immigrants from high risk countries should not be banned, however they still should have extra criminal background check done.
@9RZPX673mos3MO
given that we are currently charging people who gained citizenship for plotting an attack with supposed ties to ISIS, yes there should be stricter screening.
@9RMDWZQ4mos4MO
I lean towards yes on this but feels like a gray area for me
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 5mos5MO
No, as individuals who apply for immigration into Canada from high-risk countries may be doing so for their own safety.
They should be given background checks before entering.
@9MC4BQL7mos7MO
I'm pretty sure if we wanted to know everything on a person nowadays we could. You guys got that covered. We work with the US on intelligence. Come on now.
Yes but some people should be able to enter if they have their family in Canada
@9M3Q54Q7mos7MO
If they are thought to be a terrorists, then they get the boot.
@9LHLKDC7mos7MO
No. Screen them heavily to be sure they aren't a threat.
@9L5GNDK8mos8MO
Yes but they could undergo a certain test that will determine and classify if they are terrorists or not
@9L4MFDN8mos8MO
Immigrants form hight risk and war torrn countries like seriea and iraq are some times in the most need
@9L2P5YG8mos8MO
It depends on the situation. If there is a potential danger alert from a few people with suspicious backgrounds, there should be more investigation, but if there is no suspicion then there should be no holdup.
@9KZBBVN8mos8MO
We want to be safe but this can lead to discrimination of people from countries that are black brown or muslim
@9KFT4PS9mos9MO
Not banned. Maybe more like a detainee. Then screen them.
@9K6M4549mos9MO
If none come in deadly it is all good then, it depends on where they're going as well.
@9K6HR9K9mos9MO
No, we are too isolated to care, and we should get land from the states if it collapses.
@9K3DVX49mos9MO
Depending on the situation, the immigrants from high risk countries shouldn't be banned from entering the country, however should be interrogated a few weeks before entering.
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
That's against the constitution to discriminate on religion, and would be a huge reversal from the history of a move to a more progressive immigration system, as we have a points based (not race or faith based) immigration system.
@9GJ3KYY1yr1Y
No only if that person poses a national threat to the country
@9GC9ZWDConservative1yr1Y
only if the individual is deemed a security threat.
@9G99M551yr1Y
There should be a thorough background check on the immigrant and all their stuff coming in. Especially their social network.
Unless they are refugees trying to escape to save their lives.
@9G5ZNBB1yr1Y
no and yes because it could look like you are just assuming that they are a terrorist but it is also good because we have to protect our country as well
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.