Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

Yes

Yes. Only if they are expected to use that money for illegal activities.

Don't ban, but put regulations or surveillance on these type of transactions.

Only if the family is needing the funds to flee the country

Not ban but certainly safe guards should be in place to ensure the funds are not for war/terrorist activities.

If they were closely monitored for criminal use, yes

No, but they should be heavily monitored and the government should be able to control it.

No, but the money must be monitored to ensure it doesn't fund nefarious behaviour.

if youre going to allow immigration at the levels youve introduced, let them send money where they need to

Yes but they would have to ensure that the money isn't going to the government or to terrorists, and since that's hard to do most of the time it should be a no

I think it should be heavily secured but I don't think it should be banned.

Yes, but I see no feasible method in which they could.

No, but authorities should be able to get a warrant to trace these transactions to the recipient if they have probable cause that they are being used to fund terrorism or undermine Canadian sovereignty or national security.

This question is too vague to provide a definitive argument of either opposition or support.

We need to strive for a unified unit of currency for the planet.

I think they should be allowed to send money because some ppl are poor

This is not of importance to me as i remain politically neutral

Do you believe there should be exceptions to financial restrictions when humanitarian aid is at stake, or are these rules too important to bend?

How do you think cross-border payment systems should prioritize human rights while still respecting international laws and sanctions?

Is bypassing government restrictions with cryptocurrencies a form of fighting for personal freedom, or does it create new dangers?

How do you balance the need for national security with the ability for families to stay financially connected in countries under sanctions?

Do you think preventing cross-border payments because of security concerns outweighs the personal needs of individuals who are in difficult situations?

Can technology like cryptocurrency really solve the struggles people face with traditional banks when transferring money internationally?

How would you feel if international sanctions meant you couldn’t financially support family members in another country, even during a crisis?

Do you think being able to send money across borders without using banks gives more freedom to the average person, or does it create more risks?

In your opinion, should governments restrict financial transactions with certain countries if it affects innocent people trying to survive?

Have you ever thought about how international money transfers impact people’s freedom to help loved ones across borders?