Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation

60 Replies

 @8CSGLXNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9ZZBW7Bfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

yes but for some transportation since most are already free, but the ones that aren't and are cost-effective should be lowered.

 @9ZRYN8Zfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

No, but I think the government should give tax breaks and incentives to private companies investing in public transportation

 @9ZQV5PZfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

#1 Engaged Public Transportation

Yes, but the government should also do some retrospectives and preventative measures on reducing the cost per kilometre of track or new service

 @9VW5KW2Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

It depends, I think densification of cities and towns would make increased public transit more feasible in Canada. Until then public transport is not a great means of transportation.

 @9VG7P4VConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, by adding more routes and hours of service. We don't live in a 9-5 society anymore and our public transportation should reflect that

 @9VG5CQ2New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Should spend more on public transportation for people with disabilities, like services such as Handy-dart and training of taxi drivers to take passengers with mobility devices

 @9VCFGXKfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

yes, provide more buses to new areas where public transportation is unavailable. Provide more buses that go to colleges or universities.

 @9V5Y68Nfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

I would like for there to be an increase in government but I do not think it is an urgent priority to focus on in terms of funding.

 @9V2B3ZYCommunistfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

No, in my opinion the cost of public transportation should be included in taxes, since paying it independently is not profitable for all people.

 @9TQ5P3Tfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, more free and efficient public transportation must be provided to reduce carbon emissions and efficiency in day-to-day life

 @9LCJ58Xfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

depends on the distance where the traveler is going, so shorter distances cost more because you could just walk or ride a bike to your destination

 @9KW57GRfrom Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

This situation need a deeper analysis, For example now even though the government bought one fare system transit student passes are not considered for this which is bad for students relying public transport on everyday basis. Uniform plans should be implemented

 @9KNX3BBfrom Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, with an effort to create affordable passenger trains that run across Canada, similar to InterRail in Europe.

 @9KMF9GPfrom Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only if the province or city has a disparity in terms of the safeness and reliability of the public transport

 @9KM32WHfrom Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, and they should have more police officers and systems out in place to help people reach safety quickly enough rather than getting stabbed for no reason.

 @9KHWY2CNew Democratic from Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, and drastically expand environmentally friendly transportation to remote areas in canada, at an affordable rate

 @9K8HRYHfrom Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

yes and provide BOTH free, public and environmentally friendly solutions - this should not come from tax payer dollars

 @9K3JWDFPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

Some public buses are missing in Canada they never come to yhe bus stop as shown in the google map so i think you should spend money on buses more.

 @9JV5LCX from New Brunswick  answered…11mos11MO

Keep the same funding, just be more efficient or hire people who will work better to build better roads.

 @9JT3V8QLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

They already spend enough money on public transportation and most of the income comes from the government itself in my opinion it should stay as it is.

 @9JRD5WLConservativefrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Depending on what they use the money for. If they start using it for environmentally friendly transportation then no. But if it is used to create more highways, busses running on gas and to keep it all clean then yes.

 @9J3WNSPfrom Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but with hightened accountability and in conjunction with other infrastructure programs for achieving a long-term state, and that has to be defined.

 @9J3DSLYfrom Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

Certain cities with lots of sprawl need to be designed differently before public transport can become a viable option and therefore so it can be worth the extra funding

 @9HXJPJSChristian Heritagefrom Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

We should build train tracks to open up the Country. Rail transport should take priority over road transportation

 @9HQ5ZCKPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I think the opposite. No child should be needing to pay for transportation unless we're old enough to get a G1 at the moment,

 @9H6FWSCfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No, where this is an environmentally friendly solution, the constructions or railway, bus stops, and street cars are crowding areas of Canada.

 @9H3YKX6from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and audit to ensure money is spent according to approved capital expansion programs and or documented operational needs

 @9GYC866Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

The government if they had extra money after upgrading infrastructure they should put it into public transport

 @9GSRV7Tfrom Prince Edward Island  answered…1yr1Y

We should take funds from some of the public transportation and put it towards à environmentally friendly one instead

 @9GNSN6Gfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

We should target public transit for communities that need it most such as expanding into rural areas

 @9GJB2HSfrom Nova Scotia  answered…1yr1Y

public transportation only works if there is adequate parking for the people who need to get there and use it...

 @9GF7LP2from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I think if they could spend money on making it more environmentally friendly they should but i also think there are more important issues that we could use that money towards.

 @9GCJ9X9from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Public transportation should be built in the form of subways. All of this investment in above ground transit, is wasteful and causes more traffic, congestion and pollution.

 @9G9MV2Tfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

yes but only if it is making the current system better. For example i would not spend more money on the LRT until they get the current problems fixed.

 @9FWMZSCfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only towards environmentally friendly solutions and prioritise transportation needs for the physically disabled to encourage physically able people to get their exercise and to save it for those who need it.

 @9FVDRPTfrom Northwest Territories  answered…1yr1Y

Public transport spending should be increased and cost as well as incentives for use of of public transport should be the responsibility of the municipality for within cities, provincial for within provinces/territories and federal between provinces/territories.

 @9FNMVTQfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

absolutely, the candian government should be spending much more on public transportation, especially on the LRT in ottawa, its not doing well right now.

 @9FMLC2Lfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9FHP9H8Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, provided the costs are put towards improvement and do not fall to the consumer

 @9FHCTXZfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if the spending goes to be more efficient and effective transportation, improving the different transport systems in cities that need it the most.

 @9FGSKLL from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and provide more free public transportation, as well as if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

 @9FGK522from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Regardless there should not only be more free public transportation but also there should be more focus on other important issues.

 @9FGK49Kfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Environmentally friendly and affordable public transport, but focus on other things if needed.

  @Matthew-Nfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and provide more free public transportation, as well as make the spending going towards environmentally friendly solutions.

 @9FFQH2Vfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, should increase spending on developing public transportation's technology

 @9FDTWFRfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending and recommend more free public transportation

 @9FDLC9KConservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No, unless the government builds bullet trains from Windsor to Quebec City.

 @9FDHSDNfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9FDBHTYfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9FBRQ28from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F8FTKFfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F85RJGfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

yes and less stinky busses also translink add compass card to apple pay pls

 @9F2MK7Gfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @9T4MVBSIndependentfrom British Columbia  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, however I think the focus should be on things like public bikes and scooters, rather than buses and trains for a healthier Canada.

 @9SBG9PTfrom British Columbia  answered…4mos4MO

Better spending based on usage. Why are we building a route to Langley before ubc!? Transit should be run more like a business and help those who use it most

 @9RTLWCPIndependentfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but this is a municipal issue, and we should have better public transportation and city planning, as well as finding environmentally friendly solutions

 @9RMDTXGfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

No, sooner or later the price will rise again thus making it MORE difficult to pay for PUBLIC transportation.

 @9QZVT44from Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

They should not allow cities to build so many high rises when the infrastructure can’t support it (aka, Toronto)

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

I think they should, but the government should also start incentivizing private companies to help the transition to green energy powered vehicles instead of paying for it all by themselves

 @9QQH84Wfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

I am in between certain places have better transport than others so possibly focusing funding on long distance or less accessible locations have the funding more focused on it. And if requires funding should be added.

 @9Q6K9XZfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

Yes however the public transportation provided should be free and should take environmentally friendly solutions into account.

 @9P8NRFMNew Democratic from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, and provide more free public transportation which also has spending going towards more environmentally friendly solutions.

 @9NNLBBRfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

yes. public transportation should be free. people want cars, they should pay tolls to use all roads. Having a car is a luxury.

 @9MCJ3PYConservativefrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

It really depends because yes we can have more public transit like rentable e bikes and scooters but we already have buses and bikes so why waste the money when it could go to housing

 @9LHLKDCfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes. Provide more free public transportation and spend money towards environmentally friendly solutions.

 @9LFH2B9Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

spending should be higher as distance decreases until you want to go outside the city in order to encourage private transportation

 @9G3LBVGfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

It should have some funding to provide transit for people without a car and to keep the transit working and tidy but it should be moderate spending just to keep them working Properly.

 @9G2PN68from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and implement taxes/tolls on those who wish to drive for their convenience instead of using public transit in high traffic areas.

 @9FW2SW5from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and provide free public transport for youth and seniors, and spending should go to environment-friendly solutions

 @9FVZYQZ from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Lower the cost of public transportation services. As most single parents can't provide enough money for their children over 13

 @9D7X3DVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and start changing urban planning to be less reliant on cars and more on trains. This would make living expenses cheaper and strengthen local infrastructure.

 @9D5WBPDConservativefrom Nova Scotia  answered…1yr1Y

 @8G296CFfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9CMLG2GLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

yes, and provide free transportation(i.e; bus, train ect) for kids under 13 years of age

 @9BZB6S4from New Brunswick  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BS794Zfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and spend more money on police and security for public transit stations.

 @9BNM3KKfrom Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BKH2QQfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if this meant less expensive bus fair and more affordable bus passes for youth and adults.

 @96JJRBTfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and we should further invest in other forms of public transportation as well.

 @96GN9N6from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No need to increase government spending but make transportation cheaper or free.

 @96GHPCHfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @963853Nfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95RNP2Lfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95QSS2JLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95K5YQGfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, it's clear that Canada's cities are going to need investments in transit, and we're going to need this infrastructure to be built as our planet is warming, and we need to reduce our overall CO2 emissions from transportation as much as possible. EVs and fuel-efficient cars can only do so much, but they don't work for everyone as cars are often a big expense for many people.

 @959RYHYfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, If the spending goes to both Free/fordable public transportation, as well as making them more environmentally friendly.

 @958MNJXfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @958GW64from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

yes and improve bike lanes pedestrian walk ways and especially safety from cars

 @957Y89Sfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @956XVNYGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @956CYVHfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but use the money thats going to foreign countries instead of adding more money or taking away from other funded things.

 @93TWCLFfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government should invest more in public transportation even if the solution is not environmentally friendly. More access to transportation reduce traffic and pollution.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...