Should the government eliminate all traffic laws and rely on voluntary compliance?

While this would be preferable to the current system, this model could be improved upon greatly by privately owned and managed roads with voluntary and negotiable rules. For instance, one could imagine an individual that has an immaculate driving record but for frequent violations for speeding. That person could negotiate terms that would allow them to drive at excessive speed without punishment, but in the event that they cause an accident, they would be personally, financially and criminally responsible. A private owner of a road may choose to voluntarily engage with such a driver because…  Read more they will spend less time on his road, and therefore facilitate faster movement of greater numbers of people along the road. Also, if this driver were to cause an issue, the road owner's risk could be externalized onto the driver or his private insurer, who, in turn would be at liberty to assess their exposure to risk based on the driver's capabilities independently of the road proprietor risk and each could charge appropriately.

Should the french president revolution in based laws and traffic are. Slowly the arrows marks of speed limits issues by new Zealand labour party leader stoplines of speeding low or higher alerts

No, we don't want all of Canada's drivers to be like the ones in Quebec.

No, traffic laws are the number-one priority in keeping our citizens safe.

No, people inherently break the rules of driving safely and control must be maintained to prevent chaos on the roads

NO. Too many humans need rules because they are incapable of making them for themselves.

Let each municipality and provincial government decide for itself.

I am in transportation, the 401 is the most dangerous highway in north america, the driving is getting worse every year and the police are not doing their job.