Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

159 Replies

 @9ZTRL63from British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, those with severe drug addictions that are majorly negatively impacting their lives should be put into mandatory rehab

 @B3BYHVRfrom Ontario  commented…2mos2MO

#1 Engaged Healthcare #2 Engaged Safe Haven

I'm 4 years clean now because of these harm reduction clinics. I'm clean because i'm alive and im alive because of them and was able to get the help I.Needed.

What you're proposing is essentially incarceration and if I was incarcerated at the time when I was addicted to drugs that would have messed with my mind so much more and I would have turned to the drugs to feel better the second I was out of the clinic.

All that would do would cause or intensify peoples mental health issues.

As a once terribly intense addict thats 4 years clean because of these places. I strongly disagree.

Please, If you dont agree with this I ask you please rethink your solution of "mandatory rehabilitation" / or in other words incarceration

 @B39CH5XGreenfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2mos2MO

Safe havens should be in non-residential areas where they can be monitored by protection services and where they can provide addiction and mental health services to those who need it.

 @B3BYHVRfrom Ontario  asked…2mos2MO

#1 Engaged Healthcare #2 Engaged Safe Haven

Why non-residental?

Just curious as to why you think it should be excluded from residential areas

 @9FQ2ZJYfrom Yukon Territory  answered…2yrs2Y

No Prefer to see funding go towards facilitirs that offer help with dependency, offer mental health assistance and rehabilitation

 @9GYSNHDfrom Nova Scotia  answered…1yr1Y

No, we should not encourage drug use but drug abuse should be seen as a health issue not a criminal one. People should not have to suffer because of past mistakes.

 @B3BDTW5from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, only if proper resources are in place to drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue. Look at Portugal as an example.

 @8VS4SD7from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @B4P248Rfrom British Columbia  answered…13hrs13H

I think this would be safer than having them use it in unsafe areas but also try to help them off of the drugs instead of just letting them waste there life

 @B4NXVPHfrom Nova Scotia  answered…14hrs14H

Yes. Because they are gonna use it anyways so why not be under supervision and it's okay. (I still don't support it though)

 @B4NWQ5Nfrom Nova Scotia  answered…15hrs15H

i think if you want to use meth and crack your asking for an overdose which is the users fault but i do think they should be put in rehab

 @B4MDG2Tfrom Alberta  answered…3 days3D

No, but drug users should have more free access to rehabilitation centers and professional guidance centers

 @B4LJDLLfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

No, absolutely not. The government should never fund anything that helps people commit an illegal crime.

 @B4KXCXXfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

I think they’re important, but I think you should be expected to come less and less. Like a 1yr time frame of windows where you are allowed to be there that reduces over the year.

 @B4K3Z7Dfrom British Columbia  answered…6 days6D

“Safe havens” only accessible for drug addicts with a drug recovery action plan. Example: Housing, therapy and meaningful work.

 @B4K29DDfrom Alberta  answered…6 days6D

Yes but those who use it should also be encouraged to get help with their addiction as this could be viewed helping them continue their addiction

 @B4H5T5Zfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

There should be housing where a numbers of addicted live together and doctors give the drugs on a schedule along with mental health care and educational programs and other programs. Then slowly reduce the drugs until the addiction is in remission and the addict becomes a full functional person.

 @B4FMP89from Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, drug abuse shouldn't be criminalized, but there should be more funding for rehabilitation centers.

 @B4FJTYPNew Democraticfrom New Brunswick  answered…2wks2W

Should re-direct and open enough beds for anyone that wants to get sober. As soon as they ask, or are willing to try. Having to wait months to have a detox but people need rehab after detox.

 @B4FFYKGfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2wks2W

Yes with parameters and safety considerations. Multiprong approach including rehabilitation to heavy penalties for major drug dealers

 @B4F8RDGfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2wks2W

no but i do think there should be a place they can go free charge were they can get help with this addiction

 @B4DMWR2from Newfoundland  answered…2wks2W

No, instead, they should increase fines of drug usage and get more funding for rehabilitation centers

 @B4BJ899from Quebec  answered…2wks2W

No, invest money on catching the drug dealers and increase funding on rehabilitation centers. Stop fentanyl from crossing the border.

 @B46NVM7from Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Have a place where people can use drugs but not have supervision of medical professionals , if they die they die.

 @B46JNPDfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

These decisions should be based on data. If the data shows that these programs are working to reduce addictions then they should proceed. But government is not responsible for providing drugs.

 @B45TJQHfrom British Columbia  answered…3wks3W

We need a better approach to the issue, focusing more on prevention. Drug use should be legalized, but not how it currently is. There has to be more supports. The current system makes things worse

 @B45RNV8from Ontario  answered…3wks3W

NO! All these places do is encourage and legalize drug use. Police and all levels of government need to put drug use and dealers/suppliers to the electric chair and all other forms of the death sentence.

 @B45NMFJfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes as a harm reduction approach however there needs to be better treatment and more access to recovery because just safe consumption is killing people and causing more deaths

 @B4554CYfrom British Columbia  answered…3wks3W

I believe more help should be available for these people, but not to enable their use of these drugs

 @B44TC98from Alberta  answered…3wks3W

I think instead of creating safe Havens for drug users to use their drugs they should be forced into rehab to get clean and get the help that they need there

 @B43SXTX from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Combine safe havens with addiction recovery programs to ensure they are a step toward rehabilitation, not just a place to use drugs.

Increase public education and prevention efforts alongside harm reduction strategies.

Implement strict regulations and community engagement to address safety concerns around these facilities.

Study the effectiveness of existing sites before expanding them further.

 @B43S4G8from British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

No, but maintain current facilities while increasing funding for addiction prevention and treatment instead.

 @B42QT9Sfrom Ontario  answered…4wks4W

they should put that same money for a "safe heven Arent going to be safe in reality and you have them running ranboo instead use the money to FIX the problom by makeing them legal But they have therapy to quit the addictions

 @B3YW962from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

No, and round the drug addicts up and put them in concentration camps where they’re forced to be sober.

 @B3TLVFQfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

I both agree and disagree with this statement, I don’t want to encourage drug use but it happens either way so having places where I can be used “safely” is not a bad idea

 @B3R23Q6from Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but the location is important. It should from schools, playgrounds and parks where children are.

 @B3QGP69from Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

It’s a waste of healthcare services we could be using for people who are actually sick and can’t help it unlike those who decide with their own free will to endanger their lives

 @B3LF5SCfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

No, but maybe a place people can come down off them, or a spot at the hospital they can go specifically for overdosing

 @B3K5JNZfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but individuals with higher amounts found in the city (dealer amounts) should be criminally charged.

 @B3HTCDYConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Maybe but not only should they be monitored drug users need to be evaluated by professionals to help them become clean

 @B3HJK9Rfrom Manitoba  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, provided that the federal government incentivizes provincial governments to invest more into mental health/rehabilitation services

 @B3GDD56from Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

Only once family doctor levels are achieved and every Canadian has a family doctor, patients no longer die waiting for care should professionals assigned to safe use sites

 @B3G7GL5from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

No, get them to rehab... But we do need to stop them from using public areas as it's a safety concern for other citizens

 @B3BXTM8from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes I believe people will use drugs illegally anyway and going to a rehab facility takes a lot of commitment and will scare away ones that are strongly addicted because they don't believe they will be able to commit to it, so something like this will feel like like less of a commitment and overall reduce drug use.

 @B374CZSfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but only if your going to help these people with their problems. Not just a free pass to do their drugs indoors

 @B36WM3Mfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but there should be measures in place to help recover from addiction and reintegrate into society

 @B35Q7K5answered…2mos2MO

Arrests for drugs should be mandatory rehabilitation with adequate housing and social supports upon release, not jail. We need to reduce the reasons why people become addicted in the first place

 @B34YB82from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

this topic can have both advantages and disadvantages as it can prevent diseases but it also can cause issues in the surrounding neighborhoods

 @B323SYYLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Drug addicts need to be put into rehab. We need more rehab centers to get these people off the streets and back to a semi normal life

 @B2XQWN2New Democratic from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

There needs to be a set process of habitation and rehabilitation . Where they undergo a certain period of reintegration with the help of specialists. One of the most dehumanizing realities that we may face is homelessness. People want purpose in life, having no home or purpose demoralizes these people . Additionally, discrimination is a large player here as well. We tend to ignore their suffering while shunning their substance abuse, but it’s their way of coping and it should be understood as such. It’s hard to maintain a job without a set place to sleep and shower , it’s hard to maintain it with a drug addiction , and it’s hard to maintain it with the risk of being homeless once again in the near future.

 @9WBC5PZfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but the use of the term "drug safe havens" is a loaded and politically charged term. the correct term is Supervised consumption site and services.

 @9W4QXDCNew Democraticfrom New York  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but there should be a limited amount of time they can access them, to encourage them to go clean

 @9W4D444from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

I believe that drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue, and to an extent agree as long as the goal is to support recovery and eliminate the patients drug abuse, rather than enable it. I also believe there would need to be additional resources available in the case that the "safe haven" does not rehabilitate certain patients and additionally a screening method as not to allow addicts with a history of violent or serious crimes.

 @9W43M3Dfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

i believe that while we should have a place for people with addictions to go we must also not enable there behavior.

 @9VW59ZNfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

No. This theory don’t work. More effective recovery methods need to be developed. Stop giving money to non profits that keep these revolving doors open.

 @9VTC46Ffrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

People addicted to illegal drugs should have to check in to rehabilitation center to be able to collect benefits from the government.

 @9VQSDXQfrom Manitoba  answered…6mos6MO

I think yes we should however it should be very strict and heavily guarded Incase of a breach or a violent patient.

 @9VQLZQ2from Nova Scotia  answered…6mos6MO

we need more then these they are in a plan but we all cant afford plus to long to build all the ones we need.

 @9VPHXL2from British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

No but legalize drugs and then tax them so that when they do overdose or need medical help, the money is coming from the taxes.

 @9VMP4KLfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

yes but more funding into social services such as rehab facilities, support low income population, etc.

 @9VML4G3from British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

We should put further funding into mental health and give everyone access to therapy on a yearly basis starting at school age to prevent drug addiction instead of bandaiding the problem after it's infested our communities.

 @9VMHLLKfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Institutionalize hard drug users and provide involuntary rehabilitation centers. Punish those committing crimes under the influence with stricter punishments.

 @9VJH8YKfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

I think that "safe havens" are temporary solution to a bigger problem and that if the root cause of abuse isn't fixed the need for "safe havens" will become unsustainable.

 @9VGMDFBanswered…6mos6MO

50/50, but in case there are such facilities they would help monitor addicts, which may help staff make informed decisions and promote rehabilitations. at least they will not be getting cheap quality or spiked drug products or even fake products, which may lead to death or worse.

 @9V9R5P2Conservativefrom Quebec  answered…7mos7MO

No, I am against the idea because it will give an opportunity to people who are clean of drugs to try drugs and could potentially become drug addicts.

 @9V7L6BPfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Create them, but do so as a subset of rehabilitation facilities. The ultimate goal should be healing; they can use the drugs to prevent withdrawal until they are able to begin their medical process.

  @seaofdisillusionfrom Nova Scotia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only in conjunction with rehabilitation centers and the staff should always encourage rehab over using

 @9V47KTKfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Drug addicts should be taken care of by sending all of them to rehabilitation without option, to then help them rejoin society.

 @9V3L2T7from British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Have "safe havens" where people who are addicted can go get medical help to recover from their addiction.

 @9TZKMBHfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

The safe havens should be used to try and ease them off the drugs, and get them to rehab, if possible.

 @9TXT46Cfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

No we should instead provide more funding to rehabilitation centers to help them instead of encouraging drug use

 @9TVQQC4from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

I used to think these sites were a net positive, but after seeing what it does to the communities around where they are added, I think they’re terrible. There are blocks in my city that are damn near uninhabitable now and it all stems back to adding a safe injection site there.

 @9TMR89C from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

Safe Havens would not help prevent drugs, and would slightly encourage drugs. It is still not right, even under supervision. Instead, we should provide counselling, support, and provide opportunity to stop using illegal drugs.

 @9TMG6K4from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

yes this will reduce drug overdose and death this should be treated as a health issue not criminal issue people need a place to go to get help and support

 @9TMDBJ5from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, it helps with less drug overdose and it should be treated as a health issue but it could also encourage drug use and lower funding for rehab centers

 @9TLVCVNRhinocerosfrom Nova Scotia  answered…7mos7MO

This is just a sugarcoated version of enabling addicts, we need to fund more rehabilitation programs so these people can get themselves off of hard drugs.

 @9TLF4ZNfrom New Brunswick  answered…7mos7MO

They should be in an institution and lowered the dose gradually and become less dependent on it and more independent as an individual

 @9TLD6LQfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but the healthcare professional should help these people quit drugs completely, and in no circumstances should drug usage be promoted.

 @9TG78F7Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, this is necessary and they should go further by adding rehab facilities to further reduce illegal drug deaths.

 @9TG67VLfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

I think that drug abuse should be treated as a medical issue, also that the interior of the "safe haven" should discourage drug use

 @9TD28DQfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as the "safe havens" are additionally purposed to assist those who are addicted, in the process of quitting illegal drugs.

 @9T8XG9Pfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

No, the only time people addicted to drugs should be able to use is when having extreme withdrawals in medical care and in small doses

 @9T4L3N9from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes but only to basically capture these people and send them off to a rehab facility where they don’t get to the choice to get clean or not

 @9SY6MFBfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

No, and there needs to be more support in earlier stages, such as kids aging out of foster care and troubled children. If we saw early signs of issues ans addressed them, these people wouldn't feel so hopeless.

 @9SQ4V2Jfrom British Columbia  answered…8mos8MO

Somewhat agree. We need to get to the root trauma of the drug usage and try to reduce the need for the safe usage site.

 @9SPC9KCfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, I do think so, but I believe the drug use should be limited and slowly limited more to help people with their addiction

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia  answered…8mos8MO

No, this only enables addicts. However, increase detox treatment availability to those reaching out for help…the window of opportunity is very small.

 @9RTLWCPIndependentfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

No, we've seen the results of safe havens, and they're not good. Legalize drugs, and incentivize or provide rehabilitation for drug use

 @9RMYX2Xfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

No, we should be more focused on treatment and recovery, but at the same time, we should not address drug abuse as a criminal issue.

 @9RC97PLNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, not only is this a mental health issue but the facility should be heavily geared towards funneling clients into rehabilitation.

 @9R27GGRConservativefrom Manitoba  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but rehab is mandatory as they are slowly weened off and counselled. Also never near children's places

 @8VMZSPXConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Money should be distributed to end drug addiction, not encourage people to do it “safely”.

 @8VJ7P3Xfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @B49S5T9Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…2wks2W

Yes, overdoses along with tainted substances are much to regular of an occurrence for this not be a safety net. However I feel that we should put more funding into rehabilitation and drug prevention.

 @B48VY3Bfrom New York  answered…3wks3W

No but we should beef up the funding to assist these people to get straight and back into society again

 @B47GXLZfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Drug addiction is a serious addiction and massive problem. We need to rehabilitate them but this is difficult because many do not want the help so this is difficult to answer.

 @B46VSY5from New Brunswick  answered…3wks3W

Yes, this will help decrease overdoses, however active aid to help those wean off drugs, to no longer using should be the main goal.

 @B46PJR2from Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Drugs should be illegal and mental health resources should be free. Example: professional counseling for free.

 @B3B5XRXLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

The decision to open such facilities should be based on a careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks, as well as the specific needs and circumstances of the community.

 @B399BKDConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Create better supports for those suffering with addictions to get appropriate mental health support.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...