The 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings caused several states and cities to pass strict gun control measures. In response, state lawmakers in gun friendly states in the South and West passed bills that would strengthen Stand Your Ground laws and allow weapons in most public places. In 2014, 21 states passed laws that expanded the rights of gun owners allowing them to possess firearms in churches, bars, schools and college campuses. The federal government has not passed any gun control measures since the 1994 Brady Bill and 42 states now allow the possession of assault rifles. In the U.S. two-thirds of all gun deaths are suicides and in 2010 there were 19,000 firearm suicides and 11,000 firearm homicides.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Gun Control
@9HPP3TR11mos11MO
I feel with the current restrictions it really affects peoples culture like Hunting. Me personally I think that they should ban weapons for Criminals and people who had mental health issues as well as add a "stand your ground law" as everyone should have the right to defend their homes, families and themselves especially in high crime areas.
@9LNL99N7mos7MO
I think guns should be harder to buy in some ways such as stronger background checks, but anyone should have the right to own a gun if they have a strong background check!
@9M3F3N77mos7MO
We already have strict background checks and have had for a long time. Not everyone should be able to own a gun. Only properly trained and licensed. It is a privilege, not a right
@8VRZQT4New Democratic3yrs3Y
Limiting purchasing further is not going to reduce gun violence, if guns can still be illegally brought across the border.
@9LFXWK58mos8MO
Every person should be able to privately own any firearm of any kind for their own protection and recreation. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good duy with a gun.
@9M3F3N77mos7MO
We already know this statement to be false, by looking at our southern neighbours. Training, licensing, and for certain guns registration are a must. Our gun laws work well as is, minus the latest bans and handgun freezes... that should be rolled back...
@9CBTBW31yr1Y
No, restrictions on purchasing do nothing but affect responsible gun owners, increase penalties for irresponsible use and ownership and maintain checkups on those licensed to ensure compliance.
@9L6ZL3TConservative8mos8MO
If I want to buy a glock I should damn well be able to buy a glock ***** so no there shouldnt be any restrictions.
@9KY87758mos8MO
No. Legal gun owners should face no penalties while we should be controlling of the flow of guns through the Canadian-American border.
@8F2KYGZ4yrs4Y
No, it's good how it is now
@8R2YKWD4yrs4Y
We simply don't need handguns or assault rifles. Only allow shotguns and hunting rifles for hunting.
@9M3F3N77mos7MO
Banning these various firearms do nothing to prevent crime, as legal owners of these guns have regular background checks, training, licensing already in place and are not being used in gun crimes.
@9ZKHTN27 days7D
NO! the goverment shouldn’t need to know how meny or what kind of guns you have there should be lisonsing to be abel to by a hunting riffel and semie Otto and more for atomatic and pistols
@9YKKLG52wks2W
Keep the current process, but refine classes for gun licencing to be specific to the type of firearm being licenced. This would ensure proper screening, safety protocol, and education are passed for every kind of gun being licenced.
@9YBBS3W2wks2W
No there should be less gun restrictions because it only punishes responsible gun owners the only restrictions should be no guns whatsoever for the mentally ill and criminals and there should be an increase penalties for gun-related crimes.
@nt24214wks4W
Hunting rifles rarely are used to kill people so I am neutral on that. However handguns are involved in most murders in Canada so there should be very very strict background checks or an outright ban.
@9W9SXGV1mo1MO
No assault weapons No, only for criminals and the mentally ill increase penalties for gun-related crimes Yhe government should pass a national “stand your ground” law on your owned property.
@9VWC5NZConservative1mo1MO
No, and they need to reduce the amount of restrictions on guns. The way gun laws are going are penalizing hunters/farmers more then criminals.
@9VW72QG1mo1MO
Crack down on illegal firearms and allow concealed or open carry for permitted users with stand your ground law
@9VVXF251mo1MO
Just restrict criminals and mentally ill people or people living with either from getting guns. Strict background checks too
@9VJLT3Z2mos2MO
No, and there should be a repeal on owning handguns, and only people with criminal records should be barred from usual gun ownership.
@9VF6ZNQConservative2mos2MO
Family history check, mental health and substance use check and a necessity to go through an emotional intelligence coirse
@9V9R5P2Conservative2mos2MO
I don’t think we should be as restricted when it comes to people purchasing weapons. Because since we have had strict regulations, we have seen a spike in crime rates with weapons. Some people take advantage of the current system where they think they are stronger due to them having illegal guns. I think we should get illegal guns off the street and legalize guns because that way, when people use guns in a harmful way, they could be punished accordingly.
@9V7M3PQ2mos2MO
Restrictions should be based on the kind of weapon, the history of the person who wants to buy it, and the intended use
@9V798RX2mos2MO
For the USA Yes, increase penalties for gun-related crimes, and require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training.
@9V5LQH8Conservative2mos2MO
Yes although I believe more work should be put into preventing unregistered firearms from being smuggled across our border
@9V32ZCR2mos2MO
I think It should be made easier for the well minded and people who are checked to be properly using it, but never for anyone with a small flaw in the background checks or mental testing.
@9TZ3TNG2mos2MO
I feel we just need to be more cautious on who we are allowing to enter our buildings and the gun should be contained in your home or car and you must have a license for it
@9TYP75W2mos2MO
No, they are taking guns away from the wrong people. The people that create harm with gun use illegal imported guns anyway.
@9TYMGRVIndependent2mos2MO
I think there should be a backround check for any criminal activities or anything that involves the person doing something bad with a gun, and a psychological test should be instigated.
@9TT5LZ52mos2MO
no but only proper guns should be sold to the right people with a licsence and a safe place for the gun
@9TQD73XConservative2mos2MO
No only for thosae who are mentally ill and violent criminals, there should also be a stand your ground law
@9TMRHV8Conservative2mos2MO
gun use and purchase does not need to be strictly forbidden but it might be a good idea to add more restrictions or background checks when selling one. Guns and self defense weapons are still an essential in your home but should have more restrictions
@9TLF4ZN2mos2MO
There should be mental health tests, safety test(liscence) and insurance on every single gun, at least 2x a year
@9THJ79M2mos2MO
there should have to be a test you take 1 week prior to purchasing a gun that studies your mental stability, they should also run background searches.
@9TG78F7Conservative2mos2MO
Yes, require strict background checkz, psychological testing, and training but, thr government should pass a national "stand your ground" law.
@9T9Y95Z2mos2MO
no but the governament should make it more difficult for criminals the mentally ill and immigrants to aquire firearms and they should increase the penalty for gun crimes along with implementing a stand your ground law
@9T98NNNConservative2mos2MO
The individual must pass a mental health analysis. They should be a certain age as well, and younger individuals cannot
@9T7P6SD2mos2MO
No, But the government should increase background checks and the fines or penalties for intentional gun related crime. Canada should focus on stopping illegal gun purchasing and enforce border checks for some illegal firearms that may get in that way. We should not be punishing hunters and other legal gun users for gun related crimes comitted by other people.
@9T42CXP3mos3MO
IF you were to buy a gun you would need to be required to take training lessons to ensure you are a worthy firarm owner and guns should be banned for convinced criminals of serious crime and unstable people
@9T3T4F73mos3MO
There should be relaxed gun laws on carrying rights, however the restrictions on acquiring a hand gun, and banning assault weapons should stay the same.
@9SSPZP43mos3MO
No. There are regulations in place. People who have guns and are responsible follow the rules. If a criminal wants a gun they’ll find one or make one. We have strict laws. And that is okay the ones who should have guns will follow the law. The ones who shouldn’t have them will unfortunately find them illegally
@9RPPNG74mos4MO
No, but there ought to be stricter requirements for the storing of firearms. Further, penalties ought to be introduced to prevent people who've lost of had firearms stolen from acquiring replacements.
@9RDS9RZ4mos4MO
There should be a stand your ground law in your own home but not necessarily in public. Those convicted of crimes, the mentally ill and those who have shown they are not responsible with their firearms should lose their right to gun ownership. Assault weapons should only be obtainable if it is reasonably believed that Canada may be invaded by another nation.
@9RCTFJ2New Democratic4mos4MO
No, however a separate organization from RCMP that can review the policy in consultation with relevant interest
@9RCBSYB4mos4MO
This was supposed to be a Canadian quiz. Why are the references about US incidents? I believe that our gun purchasing laws are sufficient. It is the illegal purchasing that needs to be policed better. Stopping illegal weapons entering the country would be a better starting point.
@9RBGJNJ4mos4MO
Yes, handguns should be banned, only hunting-oriented guns should be allowed, and only for those holding hunting licenses.
@9QZVT444mos4MO
I think background checks and psychological testing is great, but I think gun related crimes should have a much greater penalty.
Immediate deportation if a gun related crime is committed by an immigrant, heavier jail time for citizens, and much heavier jail time if that gun isn’t registered. The penalty for using a gun on someone should be something to be feared.
@9QQVM6K5mos5MO
Yes, I think all guns should be banned for the public, except for the jobs that require it, such as police officers and military professional, because honestly, guns have only caused more bad than it has ever caused good, and that is especially clear in places such as the US, where it is very legalized.
@9PWN4M95mos5MO
Increase screening process for responsible owners. Fund safety and training courses. And make gun related crimes a lot more serious
No, but yes if with added restrictions concealed and open carry are discussed, and stand your ground laws are passed.
@9NMWPJK6mos6MO
The current process is already fairly rigid and quite effective. I don’t agree with spending more tax dollars to focus on law abiding citizens. Do something about the border and gang activity. Put the tax dollar focus where it could actually make a difference rather than being used as a tool to make a politician look good to citizens who are uneducated on guns and gun law.
@9N66KW56mos6MO
The requirements to purchase a firearm are fine as is. Maybe lifting the restrictions on firearms would be a good idea
@9N227WH6mos6MO
No, but only for criminals, the mentally ill, for assault weapons. Also, increase the penalties for gun-related crimes (no matter the age).
@9MKYKGX6mos6MO
No, only for convicted criminals and the mentally ill. Also increase penalties for gun-related crimes, and the government should pass a national "stand your ground" law. The PAL system should be abolished and concealed carry of handguns should be legalized.
@9MKYHZ76mos6MO
Yes, but gun laws in Canada should be reformed so that having a gun at home for self defense is allowed
Expand self defence law and allow the carrying of weapons for personal safety but ban concealed carry and introduce strict background check and psych test law.
@9MFRB3L6mos6MO
Guns are for self-defense, people should have to go through training to get a license for one but should still be able to get one. Criminals and mentally ill people should not be able to get them.
@9M4Y3KD7mos7MO
guns should only be used in gun ranges or for hunting not in any type of public area or be accessible to the public you should have the proper license and documents to purchase a fire-arms
@9M2NVQB7mos7MO
I think no because real criminals have no problem getting illegal guns nowadays so they can kill and home invade this is why I think we should have castle laws like the US
@9F6YRJ81yr1Y
No, but if the person purchasing a gun has a criminal record, yes
@8Y8RTJC3yrs3Y
guns shouldnt be for self defense only for police military or for hunting
@8VK33KS3yrs3Y
I don’t believe that people who want to kill will get a gun legally anyways. Why spend money on something government can’t control. Gun stores already do follow the law.
@8VHG65B3yrs3Y
doesnt matter. PEople will still find a way to have a gun, legal or not
@8VGQQ2M3yrs3Y
No, instead the government should focus their effort on eliminating the illegal gun trade.
@8PFDTKFConservative4yrs4Y
I believe that restrictions on guns should be far lower and we should lift several gun bans
@8MS74JB4yrs4Y
Yes, only allow guns for hunting, but make the background checks more strict.
@8HC8S594yrs4Y
More restriction? GUNS must be banned.
@8DJXV7R4yrs4Y
Canada should unban all weapons, you should only need an ID to purchase firearm, and we should allow self defence both inside and outside the home.
@965DR5M2yrs2Y
i think it is good how it is
@9LX2BF97mos7MO
Yes, high requirements with much more freedom afterwards. As long as everyone is trained properly and checked, you should be able to own even military level equipment if you so choose.
@9L2SXDR8mos8MO
This should be tailored to what time of gun-related violence we see in the country, and maybe that should be by province. More individual crimes? Crack down on gun licencing checks. More organized crime? Go harder on punishment or funding special police organizations to cut off group crime lines of trade. I do not, however, think that we should scale back our current gun laws at all. They just need a tweak when and where necessary.
@9KNX3BB9mos9MO
Yes, we should require background checks, training, and psych tests, but we should allow any non-automatic firearms to be legal for those who pass the checks
@9KM3HYPConservative9mos9MO
Restrict who can buy a gun, but dont ban them, also the gun show loophole was never a thing in canada.
@9KKT7PV9mos9MO
in Canada for the time being I think we have a good middle ground i wouldn't be apposed to more but i dont thank it will really do much
@9K6M4549mos9MO
Guns should be free to use, but private selling can become an issue, and background checks can really help on a person.
@9K5QKX89mos9MO
no infact they shoud allow more guns to be purchased in canada including handgunsas well as looser restrictions on these firearms
@9JT265B10mos10MO
no, only for the criminals & mentally ill, increase penalties for gun - related crimes, & add a "stand your ground" law
@9JS2P7L10mos10MO
Yes while making sure loopholes are closed while taking heavy measures like strict background checks, psychological testing, and training.
@9JN3LGRConservative10mos10MO
No, people should be able to buy and own any gun they wish unless they are a criminal or are mentally ill
@9JJJ7GS10mos10MO
Yes. for the cities. The towns that are far away from cities can purchase guns provided registery and criminal check . Once passed, they can own guns for protection reasons
@9JC6BKV10mos10MO
There should be a divide on gun policy between cities and counties. It makes sense to own a gun where there are natural wildlife hazards that could endanger yourself or your property, however in cities gun ownership is almost exclusively a hazard to yourself and your neighbours.
@9JBXLXS10mos10MO
There should be mandatory mental health testing. Hell I am even for disabled people like Autistic people, it’s actually ideal to own one because we get taken advantage of or often forced to do things we don’t want, or don’t listen to us when visibly distressed like when we are having meltdowns. Things like yelling scares us. Plus we hate being touched. Even women should own one too, because they are also vulnerable.
@9HXL8D511mos11MO
People should not be allowed to buy military grade weapons or anything more powerful then what you would need to kill a big buck. There should also be more restrictions on criminals gaining weapons.
@9HV5QFW11mos11MO
No. Any citizen or permanent resident who hasn't been convicted of an indictable offence or involuntarily committed should be allowed to buy, possess, and carry firearms for sport shooting, hunting, or self-defence. A national "stand your ground" law should be passed.
@9HT9NSYConservative11mos11MO
No, more resources should be allocated to federal, provincial, county, and city law enforcement to enforce the already existing laws, and Canada should implement some variation of Castle Doctrine
@9HGG7VG12mos12MO
POV: we add the purge once a day and then like guns are very popular for the economy and stuff and then like no more anything bad like over pricing stuff
@9HCP7QV12mos12MO
No. Obtaining, possessing, and using firearms should be made easier. Criminals don’t care about the law, these restrictions only affect law abiding citizens. We should have the right to own firearms as well as castle laws.
@9H8BM7B12mos12MO
No, but semi-automatic rifles should be mostly banned, unless chambered in .22LR, handguns should be allowed for self defence
@9H7G7FJ12mos12MO
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
@9H6DVYBNew Democratic12mos12MO
There should be a deeper background check and other test as well making sure the owner is aware and responsible of a firearm.
@9H2962J1yr1Y
No, I believe that it should be less strict, and home owners who pass the restrictions can legally buy a gun for home defence.
@9GYC866Conservative1yr1Y
no there should not be more restrictions but there should be a test back round check and yearly check ins on gun owners
@9GVMYT31yr1Y
No, legal gun owner are already subject to daily RCMP Background check and they are subjected to unwarranted searches and other penalties.
@9GVKBFK1yr1Y
Yes, anyone with a criminal history can not own or be in the possession of a gun and no one may own or posses a military weapon
@9GRZW9K1yr1Y
Guns should not be banned from the public, but potential customers should be put through more testing and background checks.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
