Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9XYC3PVfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes, and they must also release their personal holdings to promote transparency and to prevent conflicts of interests.

 @9DXHQ26from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @8VT966Bfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9MKYHZ7from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

No not for their personal finances, but they should require a public audit every year they are in office

 @9LJGNWTPeople’s from British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, and all trust, foundation and corporate tax records for 5 years prior to election and every year that they hold office.

 @9JXW8SVfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

if they are receiving funding, they should provide a legal paper trail of where that funding is being distributed.

 @9J6QYXYfrom Saskatchewan  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, once they run for any political office above the municipal level, like provincially or federally.

 @9HSTJPK from Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Yes and they should have to publicly release the amount their office costs the riding, (and not through running through hoops to find such information) I also think they should HAVE TO visit every town in their riding at least once per year. Dr. Kitchen has NEVER been to Montmartre!

 @9FJ88XBfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9D8CP57Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @8T9SCRWfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and their holdings should be known to all to prevent conflict of interests.

 @8SH9LNKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and a complete account of their personal holdings and investments should also be released.

 @8RMCSFMLiberalfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should be required to disclose a comprehensive financial disclosure

 @shaelynjfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

yes because it’s important to see what theyre getting for what their doing-but it shouldn’t be a requirement (only show it once a year)

 @8QXR442New Democraticfrom Newfoundland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PJY6KHfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Not all political candidates but those who are chosen to fill government positions should be required to prove that they income isn't altered in any way and taxes are payed.

 @8PJK4ZVfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NMVTSMfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

They should not have to, however should be required to be auditted as well as the audits should be revealed while they are in office.

 @8LBMXPFfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KG75SDfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, only those which apply to their time in office in order to identify any conflicts of interest.

 @8JWJ96Yfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8F3PG2ZConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CCZXDPfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

I don't think this is important, but they should be audited to ensure they are not embezzling or evading taxes. Besides, candidates are just figureheads in the grand scheme of things, the transparency needs to happen with electoral promises, and the senate, and the supreme court and with figures that are not elected who have veto power.

 @99L7RQQPeople’sfrom Newfoundland  answered…2yrs2Y

 @995BP6Wfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Only if they have committed previous tax crimes or are participating in fraudulent or questionable activities in relation to their personal or governmental finances.

 @98S4797from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, it shouldn't be a requirement but it would be very wise to do that as a political candidate

 @9428PLP from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but future candidates should have to, and current ones should be encouraged to

 @8PR95KYfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the people want that, just like anyone else they shouldn't be required.

 @8P8LQRNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but encourage them to do so through other means, such as a marginal increase in political funding

 @98F2D7Ffrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95WMMMTfrom Quebec  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95WJMYNfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

if the political candidate is suspected of bribes or criminal activity they should be required

 @92S6KXHfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

All tax returns and holdings should be made public for people in public offices.

 @8Z52VVMfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

No but they should be subject to an independent audit to rule out tax evasion/fraud and a mental health review to ensure they are of sound mind.

 @8XRPZWPfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VWXDZSfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VV2P57from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, only political leaders should be required to release their recent tax returns to the public and require a public audit each year they are in office

 @8VLRB84from Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VGSWSDfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, members of government should be subject to audit, candidates should have the right to privacy

 @8VJH6DQfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VJ6J92Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

The candidates for the political parties should absolutely show where their money’s going, to ensure the wealth stays among the citizens, not greedy politicians who are bought under the table.

 @8V7LPJXfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @Steeviemacfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but aspiring political candidates should undergo a financial audit as part of a vetting process.

 @8TYJGN5from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8TXVXMLfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TV87RVfrom Quebec  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TJGF2Jfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if there is some question about the ethics of their financial dealings

  @MSelvig from Wyoming  answered…3yrs3Y

We should repeal the current tax system by implementing The FAIRtax; thus, eliminating tax returns.

  @93G2RP7 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

 @3GZTJR2answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and also require them to release their medical records each year they are in office as well as have a public audit each year they are in office

 @8QGX3S7 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but if they are in high demand from the public, they should be released.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you feel if you discovered a leader you support had hidden significant parts of their past from the public?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Would you still support a politician who has changed their stance on major issues multiple times? Why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How important is it for you to know the personal values of the people you vote for, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Imagine finding out a public figure you admire has a controversial secret; how does that change your perception of them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Do you believe politicians should have the right to keep their personal lives private, or is the public entitled to know all aspects of their lives?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If a leader makes positive changes, do you think their past mistakes should be overlooked? Explain your reasoning.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Should the amount of personal information leaders share with the public change depending on their role or the issue at stake?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Does finding out a candidate has drastically different personal beliefs from you change your willingness to support them? Why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

In the age of social media, do you think politicians can truly keep any aspect of their lives private, and should they try to?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you react if a politician you didn't support was found to be more transparent and honest than one you do support?

 @6HM8ZBP from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for the purposes of learning from where they receive their income or if they are defrauding the IRS.

 @kgtiberius from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No. Candidates should only release such data when this becomes a legal requirement, either by Act of Congress or by subpoena; however, voluntary release of such private data would make me more comfortable and knowledgeable about the candidate's trustworthiness and to whom the candidate might be susceptible. Once the candidate is elected to office, financial review is a requirement of security clearance (along with medical records) -- and should be open to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act).

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties

 @7VXCKJ2 from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but they should go through an independent audit from public and private organizations.

 @89CDM9C from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

Not publicly, but a multi partisan Congressional committee that changes every year should be privy to yearly audits. Senators and Representatives should also be subject to audits every other year. The audits should only be made public if the president or Congressperson is legally charged with wrongdoing.

 @842VWLK from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8DC736Tfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, I also believe they should be audited every year and release their medical records and their annual medical report.

 @8GR8N5C from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

I am honestly unsure, I feel that after trump it should be required but at the same time it is personal stuff

 @8KCZFTR from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes because some people have been avoiding this to prove they did not commit tax fraud... that person being Donald Trump the president of the United States

 @8MF2HYV from Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

Independent Annual Audits should be required for political candidates before and during their terms to insure they are not receiving illegal funds, but these do not need to be released to the public.

 @akevinchen from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and also required to release their medical records and a public audit each year they are in office

 @8QRNS6M from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RD679Xfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and a complete list of their holdings should also be disclosed as well.

 @8TF44GJ from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to, and tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties

 @8VTBF8J from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

Instead of the candidates, how about the people already in office. As we know their salaries already, they should tell us how they achieved their new found wealth.

 @8W82FZ5 from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WP5BCC from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WQNM5V from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

No, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties, and their income is none of our business

 @8XC9PG6 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if there are credible accusations of fraud or illegal business practices

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...