Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?

No

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Digital wallets that the government can control is how we will lose democracy and freedom

Yes and these wallets should be treated as regular bank accounts - the government should get a warrant if they want to monitor an account

The digital wallet should be subject to the similar regulations as an IRL bank account

Yes, but monitoring should occur only after a warrant is received by a judge in the case that there is probable cause to investigate a potential crime.

Yes, and it should be a joint effort from both public and private sector to monitor, not control to protect the interests and safety of citizens while upholding the rule of law.

Should be allowed to people who want it, but only people who want it.

Do you think the feeling of control over your digital finances would change if you knew someone was always watching?

In the fight against illegal activities, where should we draw the line between surveillance and privacy?

How do you think criminals might adapt to a world where all digital transactions are monitored?

If your digital wallet could talk, what do you think it would say about your spending habits?

Would you trade some of your financial privacy for the promise of a safer online community?

How might knowing that your digital wallet transactions could be monitored impact what you choose to buy?

What does financial privacy mean to you in an age where digital transactions are becoming the norm?

If you found a wallet full of digital currency, would you feel more compelled to try to return it knowing its transactions could be traced?

Imagine a world where you have total control of your money online: exciting or terrifying, and why?

How would you feel if every purchase you made with digital currency could be seen by someone else?