The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In 1997 the U.S. Congress passed the “Leahy Laws” which cutoff security aid to specific units of foreign militaries if the Pentagon and the State Department determine a country has committed a gross violation of human rights, such as shooting civilians or summarily executing prison…
Read more@B2XR6VF4wks4W
I don't support making any decisions on "accusations". Accusation is not guilt. Current politics, and more specifically propaganda makes it very difficult to tell what accusations are likely to be real, and those that have a political agenda.
@B2SWR5QConservative1mo1MO
In general yes, however any accusations of Israel violating national law are false, there fore I believe it arms sales need to be examined on a case by case basis.
Yes, I don't think we should be providing arms to any country but can provide military aid when needed.
@9ZYVF3M3mos3MO
if we are allies we should support them, but If they committed human rights violations the arms sales should be reduced
@9ZNXRCY4mos4MO
Yes for the most part but, keep selling to countries that we are allied with, regardless of their stance on human rights.
@9WYDMSD4mos4MO
Yes, we should not give any weapons to the government of an occupying force, any government actively committing genocide and should focus mainly on arming and funding liberation movements, people fighting against a dictator or foreign occupier.
@9RFBPZV8mos8MO
Accused is not proof. I'd need access to unbiased, specific, and accurate knowledge to have an opinion
@9RC2QHKNew Democratic8mos8MO
No, depending on whether fhe country is under duress by another country with even greater human rights violations, the subject must be handled with nuance.
@9RBWQPY8mos8MO
Yes, but the question of who is deciding if human rights violations are being done should be with Canada. The UN is a joke.
@9QZCYDN8mos8MO
If there's evidence that the country does that then yes. Only give weapons to trusted allies that need it.
@9W9DFQ3Conservative5mos5MO
It depends on which organization is doing the accusing. Most of the international organization such as UN, ICJ, ICC are inherently corrupt, dishonest and dysfunctional.
@9VF4NS95mos5MO
Yes, Canada should not sell weapons to any country.
@9T64K8RConservative6mos6MO
Yes, but only on our enemies and to have strict accountability with our allies whom we do send our weapons to.
@9KJYBFWConservative1yr1Y
Only for certain countries like Saudi Arabia. Not countries like Israel.
@9K6HR9K1yr1Y
Either Way, No And Yes, if i had the time to do it so i'd fund in organizations in other countries i dont like, And Second off, that's immediately cut off due to how pathetic humans and the world is.
@9JSPMXF1yr1Y
Yes, but only if it's been proven that they've violated human rights or if they are in desperate need of assistence and we can afford it.
@9ZK3JNS4mos4MO
Yes, we should only give weapons to liberation movements like the IRA, PFLP and Hamas and countries that are in opposition to NATO so NATO and those countries can weaken eachother.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
