Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

1.1k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

Yes

 @9FVJBC3 from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Public transportation should not exclusively run on electric power allowing options to have a two source energy system. Allowing safety measures to keep the buses and trains running non stop for the citizens by decreasing the chances of having transportation malfunctions &/or shut downs by electricity exclusive vehicles/machinery. Also another addition would be that it would allow our equipment to work in a potential circumstance of solar flares disrupting all electric devices on the planet.

 @9FHNJS3from Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

the architecture in Canada doesn't support the simpler green transportation like walking and cycling.

 @9FTLBNRLiberalfrom Ontario  agreed…1yr1Y

Many Canadians aren’t aware of the damage they are doing, some might not even know what fossil fuels are but still contribute to them, for example they might not know that one tank of gas used could produce 2.68kg of fossil fuels.

 @9FC8PV5from Alberta  agreed…1yr1Y

People should agree with green transportation for many reasons and those are;

1. Environmental Benefits
Reduced Carbon Emissions, by using safer way of transportation such as electric vehicles this reduces the amount of carbon footprint we emit.
2. Economical Benefits
By using lower operational cost (gas) like electric vehicles we can see that they are more energy efficient and cost less to operate per mile
3. Health Benefits
Using greener options out air quality can get significantly better as this reduces the amount of exposure to pollutants and going further this can help with a reduced healthcare cost associated with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

No

 @9G4BGQMNew Democratic from Saskatchewan  disagreed…1yr1Y

Changing public transportation to electric would benefit society in the long term both financially and environmentally, but would have to require good budgeting to ensure it doesn’t effect the financial scales too much

 @9LW3PRQfrom New York  agreed…8mos8MO

Our electrical grid physically cannot take all of this and it will cost our environment either way to mine the lithium. It takes substantially deeper digging into our ecosystem to mine lithium than it does to pump natural oil and it'll cost more as well.

 @9H2K5D7Conservativefrom British Columbia  agreed…1yr1Y

Lithium mining - we ship lithium across the globe - from polluting mines run on fossil fuels - on big diesel boats and jet-fuel planes to use a non-renewable metal to power our buses and cabs... sounds like a step in the right direction.

 @9FKSS3GLiberalfrom Ontario  agreed…1yr1Y

Climate change. everyone can agree that climate change is actually happening but climate change is happening because of to much carbon in the atmosphere. what causes carbon to be realsed you may ask? Fossils fuels and one of the main resourses that admit carbon into he atmosphere.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

Yes, and increase taxes and regulation of the fossil fuel industry

 @9FR6HN6People’sfrom British Columbia  disagreed…1yr1Y

We should focus more on people in China polluting before we do here as they are astronomically worse.

 @9HKDJJ3from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

i feel like anger from most people would start to happen if taxes started to go up higher than usual

 @9H2K5D7Conservativefrom British Columbia  disagreed…1yr1Y

the fossil fuel industry is currently one of Canada's largest sources of income, and it is our main option as of right now. Changes can be made to protect our environment, but increasing taxes and regulations would not work, and it would punish all Canadians until we magically all started using alternative energy sources.

 @9LW3PRQfrom New York  disagreed…8mos8MO

Although this might fix the problem of pollution in our own backyard, it will also take away industry and natural gas production, leading us to rely to heavily on other countries and paying more for oil and gas. We spend too much as it is.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

No, not all, just focus on infrastructure that is easy and cost-effective to replace

 @9FVHTD2from Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

Climate change is a serious issue in not only Canada ,but the world. We need to get going and make this country electric. The future is electric

 @9ZYD4SSConservativefrom Quebec  disagreed…3wks3W

The green transportation is very important, even though we live in a cold climate green energy is good.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

No, we have more important issues that need funding right now

 @9FPDYZTLiberalfrom Manitoba  disagreed…1yr1Y

Okay buddy as long as we're not all dead from climate change to benefit from the funding of these "other issues"

 @9FP7WBHNew Democraticfrom Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

Green transportation is one of the most important issues Canada faces today, its necessary that we fund green transportation to lower our ecological footprint.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

No, batteries are just as harmful to the environment

 @9FKN4MDfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

It is yes because we are harming our environment and animals from throwing out to batteries in green land of the animals' home.

 @9MR9VHJfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

no, not at all, just focus on infrastructure that is easy and cost-effective alo no compomises should be made in the quality.

 @B24CNGLfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

we should gradually change over to electricity when we are able to make it cost less than petrol or diesel

 @B24BWSNfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

No, but we should work towards increasing number of electric vehicles in order to reduce NOx emissions.

 @9ZYVF3Mfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

I believe that it is better to switch to electric, but I believe it would be difficult to charge large vehicles on electric power

 @9ZTYYCSfrom Ontario  answered…4wks4W

I believe that is would be more cost-effective, even better for the environment, if we switch buses and trains to hybrids. They require less lithium, which means less mining, but also reduces cost.

 @9ZQV5PZfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but with a strong focus on battery-less solutions - overhead wire and third rail solutions are more than sufficient with good planning and reduced interference in engineering design

 @9ZPCWGCfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

in the future maybe, it is more important to invest heavily in ANY public transport than to require a certain type

 @9ZM5X8Cfrom Manitoba  answered…1mo1MO

Extreme stance, and not the most important issue currently. You just want to profiteer off hydro the way you already do with gas

 @9ZLJC2Bfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

no because it would take to long to charge the bus an it would slow people down when they need to go somewhere cause it takes two hours to charge a car imagine how long it would take to charge the bus

 @9YKHL3Bfrom Manitoba  answered…2mos2MO

No, buses should use whatever fuel sources they currently use while trains should use a pressure power generator also known as kinetic energy

 @9YGQ4B3from Quebec  answered…2mos2MO

Yes because it is better but it is still not the best and why change just for change to something a little bit better

 @9YDW8XRfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

No, because for the same amount of money we can increase bus routes and frequency which are proven to reduce emissions by a much larger amount. In the long run, sure.

 @9XQWQS7from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

I say yes and no because if you have gas and electric power at the same time you can see if one of them works better.

 @9XJDXXWfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

Depends how you charge the batteries, and Need more/better public transportation instead of what fuel it runs off to help the climate.

 @9XCL7LDfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

No, batteries are just as harmful to the environment - and we have more important issues to take care of.

 @9WZBPQVfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Funding should be increased for electric public transit, but we should also ensure that costs are kept down.

 @9WT79V6from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Busses should not be electrified unless it can rely on a battery not overhead canary lines, however trains should be electrified.

 @9WSS4QBfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

No, Canada's weather makes it impossible to rely solely on electric vehicles. Hybrid is the way to go. Batteries are just as harmful to the environment, and until a regulated and environment-friendly method of disposal can be found, Hybrid is the way to go.

 @9WPPMKFRhinocerosfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

It depends on the cost of having all buses electric, it would probably be better just to have some electric buses for now until we have a better way to power them.

 @9WH9V2Ffrom Manitoba  answered…2mos2MO

i think it wouldnt hurt to have some that are electrique but not all cause that would be extremly expensive

 @9W2P477from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

I support hydrogen fuel cells as a better alternative to electric. In the absence of hydrogen, electric is fine for provinces that generate their electricity from renewable sources or nuclear power. Otherwise, it doesn’t matter.

 @9W2MG5Vfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

I believe the use of electric transit is good when it’s economically and environmentally beneficial however sometimes we need gas and diesel transit

 @9VX5GYPNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Rolling out electric buses is a good idea but any bus is gonna be pretty environmentally friendly as opposed to a car.

 @9VW5KW2Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Not all, should be implemented when to environmental impact of doing so is great enough to outweigh the cost of implementing.

 @9VRV3DMLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, as long as the infrastructure is in place for all cities and the technology used is not environmentally harmful.

 @9VK2GQJfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

buses and trains should be Hydrogen, of course, like Germany, France, Australia...come on guys. HYDROGEN

 @9VJ8335Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

No, but we should slowly transfer into this phase investing money at a solid pace, other important issues need more funding

 @9VJ7N4Zfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Increase use of water ways. I also do think EV batteries are equally as harmful so do not believe they should be soley used.

 @9VDT7NFNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

No, until we figure out how to generate electricity efficiently without repercussions, then we can make that change.

 @9VCWVXMfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

It's good to push towards electric transport but we shouldn't spend a portion of a funding on it when there's more important things.

 @9VCRYRWfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

This is an intresting question, as it would be much for efficient and good for our planet, but will also cost a lot more in terms of batteries and powerplants

 @9V9JY32from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Some public buses and trains should be converted as technology is developed to do so in an environmentally friendly way

 @9V7LLXBfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

No, the use of electric power by city transportation will only increase the cost of electricity to private individuals who drive electric vehicles already.

 @9V47JZ7from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but over time. Meaning that the government starts to put more electric transportation and by a certain year its should all electric

 @9TZTF5Jfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

No, we should prioritize infrastructure promoting the use of public transportation which already produces significantly lower emissions than transportation such and cars and planes.

 @9TY6BR6from Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Depends on the electric power since it might cause some problems too if all the public transportation ran on electric power

 @9TVTH6BLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

It depends on different cities and public transportation development plans. If it's beneficial for a certain term, it should be one option.

 @9TSTKVYfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

it depends on how much it would cost to make every train or bus electric because it is very expensive to build them.

 @9TSHWFZConservativefrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

How about instead of making everything electric make it so bums aren't allowed on the bus, actually make people pay the 3 bucks. And make the bussing good. so many area of Edmonton need to take 3 busses just to get to school its ridiculous

 @9TQWX6J from Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

battery busses are harmful for the environment, expensive, and have a far superior relative trolly busses

 @9TQ5P3Tfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

No, but greater emphasis should be placed around the importance of reducing waste and more education should be provided around life planning and birth control to reduce exponential population growth

 @9TG9Z7Wfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

The majority of trains and buses should run on electric power, but we shouldn't completely outlaw fossil fuel using automotives.

 @9TFCZYHfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

All trains should run on electric power. However, buses should not be mandated to run on electric power.

 @9T9MY5DConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

I agree and disagree because electric vehicles are better for the world but it’s not safer so it’d be better to do it of fashion

 @9T9BN2Cfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

No, there are numerous communities were electric based public transportation would not function due to weather conditions.

 @9T98NNNConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

I think instead of being satisfied with electric power, batteries are just as harmful to the environment. They need to focus on solar power, wind power, and water where they can.

 @9T82KBTConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

Not all trains and buses because the cost would be too high and transportation would be less. But overall aiming for more electrical vehicles is a splendid idea.

 @9T7WWLKfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

I believe in both instances that electric and fossil fuels are useful and create opportunities for people in careers. Without the use of fossil fuels in our world, where would all the workers who work at these factories go? I believe that regulations on fossil fuels are a smart idea, however full restriction can be harmful to the economy.

 @9T3VJQSNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

I think we need more research in the area of electric vehicles and if it is truly a more sustainable and safe solution to oil and gas. I think the bigger issue is the monopolization of the energy industry. They have to much power and influence. We need to diversify energy and educate our people on the subject so we can make more informed decisions on what is best for our population and the world at large.

 @9T26WNPfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

Ev’s are too unreliable for Canadian weather, if anything we should use hybrids in order to reduce carbon emissions

 @9SZCP3Wfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

No, have a mix of both electric and gas powered forms of public transportation. That way we cut emissions while also providing a more reliable way of transportation in colder climates

 @9SVZQJFfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

No, not until electric vehicles become a more viable option in the extreme cold temperatures of the Prairies, Quebec, and parts of the Atlantic

 @9STC26Dfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

There should be a mix of both for now, the process to develop the batteries IS very intensive and not harmless.

 @9RW6ZLWConservativefrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

yes, but old busses and trains should be used until the end of their capacity before purchasing new ones

 @9RCXHVJCommunistfrom Manitoba  answered…5mos5MO

Electrifying buses and trains is good but should be secondary to just expanding bus and train fleets period

 @9RCRJ4Ffrom Nova Scotia  answered…5mos5MO

This should be a goal to achieve eventually, but practically speaking it won’t happen for a while. Let’s look first at how to get more and better functioning routes to eliminate cars off the road vs a handful of buses.

 @9RCBSYBfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

All public buses and trains should run on hydrogen power, not hydrogen electric but purely hydrogen combustion.

 @9RC97PLNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only where structurally and economically feasible. Certain low-density population and/or infrastructure areas may be better served by carbon neutral emission vehicles.

 @9RC8XFTfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Where practical and financially responsible to do so yes. Light rail, mono rail etc yes, long distance high speed rail no.

 @9RBX68Mfrom New Brunswick  answered…5mos5MO

No, where feasible should be done, but electric vehicle technology does not work in every application in its present state.

 @9RBQGTNfrom Quebec  answered…5mos5MO

Yes in areas where it is feasible to do so, recognizing that our northern areas may need to rely on older oil based tech while electrical technology becomes a feasible long term solution in extreme cold.

 @9QQVM6Kfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

Yes I agree that transitioning public buses and trains to electric power would benefit the environment extremely, but I also understand that could be difficult because initial costs would be high, but ultimately its better for our world, so I agree.

 @9QQN2BLfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

If there is a single bus taking care of an entire neighbour hood or more let it run on gas but the small trollies in Toronto should be electric powered as they travel short distances.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...