Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Province/Territory:

43 Replies

 @B25MQFXfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

No, but they should have the authority to demand it if there is due reason presented and affirmed by a judge.

 @B229T77from Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes but there is a fine line on the subject , they should to protect consumers without loosing company’s confidentiality

 @9ZLJC9Nfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

they should not share unless they complete trust the regulators and think that it is best for them to share with them

 @9ZLJC2Bfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

it really depends on if its a small business if its a small business then no but if its is a big business then yes

 @9ZF4M8Jfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

How would this be enforced- as ling as consumers know there is an algorithm it should be up to then to balance it

 @9ZD7HCGfrom New York  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, to the extent misleading information is being disseminated or algorthmically generated info turbocharges major social issues such as eating disorders and mental health

 @9YL4MGJfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

If the company should tell that regulator about chemicals or more. But huge secrets should be given to government agencies and not normal day people.

 @iAmCodeMonkeyLibertarian from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Maybe. Depends if the algorithm specifically targets users with unwanted advertising or other useless fluff.

 @9WZVYVTfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Depends on how it's done. Sharing information with the government could be scary, what would the government do with that information?

 @9WZ44D2from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

I think the original algorithms that took a lot of time for the companies to make should be kept confidential, but the other algorithms I think can be shared with other companies.

 @9WTFLNNfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

They aren't obliged to but if they were questioned by any organization or group, they should willingly share the algorithms.

 @9W8GJCBfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

As long as they are approved government officials and will be tried for treason if they reveal proprietary information. But to ensure safe tech, yes.

 @9TT56PCfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Yes free speech should be allowed to a certain point to not being discriminatory and mean however there should be protections on privacy settings.

 @9TQTQCWConservativefrom New Brunswick  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only under conditions of the strictest secrecy to ensure businesses can retain their competitive advantage.

 @9T35CHWfrom British Columbia  answered…4mos4MO

No; I suspect that if we ask for this, companies will simply block Canadian use like they did for news content.

 @9SZHZL3from Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

Tech companies are allowed to share generalized algorithms with regulators but not individual/personal ones

 @9SSRG9Hfrom Manitoba  answered…4mos4MO

Yes but only if it is in the best interest of the public to do so. For things such as healthcare and financial education.

 @9VGR4J9from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

They shouldn't share it but allow regulators to get a better understanding and a look over it to stop abuse of the people.

 @9TYP8M4Liberalfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

The government should ensure that large tech companies follow a strict set of regulations but do not need to be shared with the public.

 @9TXCKPHfrom Quebec  answered…3mos3MO

I Think at only for some instances and circumstances regulators should be allowed to speculate the algorithms. A full control on rugalators would also be bad for the economy.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

no that is an abuse of proprietary process/resources, but the extreme legal limit should be allowed and dis/misinformation be outlawed against it

 @9RVGGSKConservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…5mos5MO

The government should promote a free market approach to culture and make sure that Canadians are free to use and consume what ever they want to consume.

 @9RDGMWSfrom Nova Scotia  answered…5mos5MO

What kind of abuse is happening if a tech company doesnt share their algorithm? I don't feel aware enough to place an opinion on this issue

 @9RCBSYBfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Transparency should be expected but only so far as to ensure fair practices and the prevention of abuse. The government "watchdogs" would have to be regulated and all information considered classified and not for public viewing.

 @9RBRL2Qfrom Nova Scotia  answered…5mos5MO

If by "tech" you"re talking about social media, then yes. That should absolutely be regulated. If you're talking about private manufacturing algorithms or communications infrastructure then I don't see the need for it.

 @9QQVM6Kfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

Np, I don't think it's fair. They don't owe anyone an explanation of how they developed their algorithm. Unless it poses a threat or they want to. It's their creation, and they shouldn't be forced to share with regulators.

 @9MLT56Xfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

 @9MLK4C6from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

 @9MJWSCSfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Algorithms should be made to be more transparent. When something is directed to someone due to an algorithm, the exact route and reason for that direction should be shown to the viewer.

 @9MW9BY2 from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

if the company has data from/about the local population then it should be mandatory for ensuring public safety and rights.

 @9MLXWMNfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

There can be non-governmental third party auditors that can do this. NOT the government. It leads to only one thing, state directly interfering and curtailing freedom of speech.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Should there be a universal standard for how social media platforms use algorithms to ensure they're not manipulating emotions or spreading misinformation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Consider the balance between a company's right to keep their algorithms secret and the public's right to know how their data is being used; where do you stand, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Imagine if your favorite online platform suddenly had to share exactly how they decide what shows up on your feed - would that make you trust them more or less, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would you feel if every piece of content you see was decided by a hidden computer recipe, influencing what you see and think every day?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Imagine a world where every piece of content recommended to you online comes with a 'why this is shown' explanation. Would this make your online experience more trustworthy or just more cluttered?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would your online behavior change if you knew exactly how and why certain posts were being recommended to you?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Think of a time when you found yourself going down a rabbit hole of videos or articles online; do you believe there should be regulations to prevent this, or is it a matter of personal responsibility?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

If you had the power to change how online platforms decide what news or content to show you, what would you change, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

What happens when the digital spaces we visit daily know more about our preferences than our closest friends do?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Have you ever felt misled or unfairly influenced by content recommended to you online; how would knowing the behind-the-scenes of these recommendations change that?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...