Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@B25MQFX1wk1W
No, but they should have the authority to demand it if there is due reason presented and affirmed by a judge.
@B229T772wks2W
Yes but there is a fine line on the subject , they should to protect consumers without loosing company’s confidentiality
@9ZLJC9N1mo1MO
they should not share unless they complete trust the regulators and think that it is best for them to share with them
@9ZLJC2B1mo1MO
it really depends on if its a small business if its a small business then no but if its is a big business then yes
@9ZF4M8J1mo1MO
How would this be enforced- as ling as consumers know there is an algorithm it should be up to then to balance it
@9ZD7HCG2mos2MO
Yes, to the extent misleading information is being disseminated or algorthmically generated info turbocharges major social issues such as eating disorders and mental health
@9YL4MGJ2mos2MO
If the company should tell that regulator about chemicals or more. But huge secrets should be given to government agencies and not normal day people.
@iAmCodeMonkeyLibertarian 2mos2MO
Maybe. Depends if the algorithm specifically targets users with unwanted advertising or other useless fluff.
@9WZVYVT2mos2MO
Depends on how it's done. Sharing information with the government could be scary, what would the government do with that information?
@9WZ44D22mos2MO
I think the original algorithms that took a lot of time for the companies to make should be kept confidential, but the other algorithms I think can be shared with other companies.
@9WTFLNN2mos2MO
They aren't obliged to but if they were questioned by any organization or group, they should willingly share the algorithms.
@9W8GJCB2mos2MO
As long as they are approved government officials and will be tried for treason if they reveal proprietary information. But to ensure safe tech, yes.
@9TT56PC3mos3MO
Yes free speech should be allowed to a certain point to not being discriminatory and mean however there should be protections on privacy settings.
@9TQTQCWConservative3mos3MO
Yes, but only under conditions of the strictest secrecy to ensure businesses can retain their competitive advantage.
@9T35CHW4mos4MO
No; I suspect that if we ask for this, companies will simply block Canadian use like they did for news content.
@9SZHZL34mos4MO
Tech companies are allowed to share generalized algorithms with regulators but not individual/personal ones
@9SSRG9H4mos4MO
Yes but only if it is in the best interest of the public to do so. For things such as healthcare and financial education.
@9VGR4J93mos3MO
They shouldn't share it but allow regulators to get a better understanding and a look over it to stop abuse of the people.
The government should ensure that large tech companies follow a strict set of regulations but do not need to be shared with the public.
@9TXCKPH3mos3MO
I Think at only for some instances and circumstances regulators should be allowed to speculate the algorithms. A full control on rugalators would also be bad for the economy.
@9RZPX675mos5MO
no that is an abuse of proprietary process/resources, but the extreme legal limit should be allowed and dis/misinformation be outlawed against it
@9RVGGSKConservative5mos5MO
The government should promote a free market approach to culture and make sure that Canadians are free to use and consume what ever they want to consume.
@9RDGMWS5mos5MO
What kind of abuse is happening if a tech company doesnt share their algorithm? I don't feel aware enough to place an opinion on this issue
@9RCBSYB5mos5MO
Transparency should be expected but only so far as to ensure fair practices and the prevention of abuse. The government "watchdogs" would have to be regulated and all information considered classified and not for public viewing.
@9RBRL2Q5mos5MO
If by "tech" you"re talking about social media, then yes. That should absolutely be regulated. If you're talking about private manufacturing algorithms or communications infrastructure then I don't see the need for it.
@9QQVM6K6mos6MO
Np, I don't think it's fair. They don't owe anyone an explanation of how they developed their algorithm. Unless it poses a threat or they want to. It's their creation, and they shouldn't be forced to share with regulators.
@9MLT56X7mos7MO
Yes, and the algorithm should be public and open source.
@9MLK4C67mos7MO
Yes, and algorithms should be shared with all consumers
@9MJWSCS7mos7MO
Algorithms should be made to be more transparent. When something is directed to someone due to an algorithm, the exact route and reason for that direction should be shown to the viewer.
@9MW9BY2 7mos7MO
if the company has data from/about the local population then it should be mandatory for ensuring public safety and rights.
@9MLXWMN7mos7MO
There can be non-governmental third party auditors that can do this. NOT the government. It leads to only one thing, state directly interfering and curtailing freedom of speech.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.