Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
@9TS28Y84wks4W
Government should find a balance that is the most economical for assisting people with disabilities get to where they need to go, whether that is through upgrading of a public system, adding accessibility to existing infrastructure, or building unique infrastructure.
@9RZPX672mos2MO
to a certain point, taxpayer funded anything should be accessible to those who actually pay taxes
@9RCJ67TNew Democratic3mos3MO
Not require, but provide incentives for municipalities that do
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 4mos4MO
Yes, and transportation systems that are not as easily accessible to disabled individuals should be renovated or if need be, replaced so that they able to provide appropriate accessibility for both people with disabilities and without disabilities.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.