Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Province/Territory:

50 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

Yes

 @9TMKVZ5from Alberta  agreed…3mos3MO

There is a huge need on mental health funding worldwide as current funding is not enough to handle the large amount of people who require the funding. If there was no funding towards mental health, suicide rates and substance abuse rates would continue to rise faster. This would be creating more problems that would be harder to deal with rather than the initial problem on finding funds for mental health.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

Yes, and increase funding for research into the causes of mental illness

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

No

 @9TMKVZ5from Alberta  disagreed…3mos3MO

Admittedly, some may say that there is no need for funding mental health, however I oppose to that argument as I am a firm believer of funding mental health. If there was no money put towards mental health resources, many would not be able to access any services due to the high costs and inaccessibility.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3yrs3Y

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, as they can help spread awareness about different health initiatives and create an informed populace, and help a lot of prevention and open up a larger discussion.

 @9WKCQFTfrom New Brunswick  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but make sure that it is implemented and that the right professionals are given the money to implement the services.

 @9D67PGLfrom Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

Mental health is obviously important, but it takes more than just funding for these initiatives. On paper, I can understand that some services suffer from a lack of funds, but it is all about how effective these services are. At that point, we can determine funding.

 @9K6M454from Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

We have alot of better stuff to do right now than this and alot of people are getting help as it is, so may it as a necessity at least, sure.

 @9G7KWZYfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but fund the 1:1 psychotherapeutic approaches for low and middle income families and individuals.

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F4F77YConservativefrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

The government doesn't need more funding for it. They need to make more laws to support the mental health of people.

 @9F3YN58from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and increase funding for research into treatment options, like more effective and safer medications with fewer side effects.

 @94VP9NSfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, invest in building more instatiunions for those who are a danger to themselves and others.

 @8VWXDZSfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes increase it with reallocation of existing funding. Funding comes at a cost so try to manage the money that is collected in taxes to give programs more equal amounts.

 @8VK5J2Yfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Mental health during this time is horrible as one who deals with mental health it’s been increasing hard. Especially when it’s $200 an hour. I live on AISH in Alberta. I have OCD and a friend studying as a psychologist suspects PTSD, DID and depression among other things.

DID is highly misunderstood. Sadly Hollywood makes it seem like those with it are criminals. So yes it needs to be helped. No safe place for people to get help that doesn’t cost a fortune.

 @8VJVNDVfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Funding should be related to all health issues as prescribe by professionals in the field.

 @8VJNPBMfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

I don’t believe funding is the real problem with the government’s involvement with mental health initiatives

 @8VJH7DQfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

There is plenty of funding. Hold individual agencies accountable for results. I worked in the Ontario Government for 10 years and the level of corruption in the local agencies is criminal.

 @8VHX7M4Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

only if they actually need it and its not for attention, for less severe cases there are other ways to cope

 @8VHVSSBfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, depending on what those health incentives are. More clarity is needed in this question.

 @8VHRB9Rfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I think the government should factor this into the funds provided to Health Services, and allow municipalities / provinces to disseminate funding as required on a local level.

 @8VHKLZPfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, focused on research into the cause and and increase/improve resilience in the populations.

 @9D36K4QLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @9CLTRM2from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9C4WP96from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

I think the government should reduce situations that increases stress by making property and basic resources public which will in turn increase mental health.

 @98YHW78from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that if there is a surplus in the budget it should relegated to aiding mental health initiatives.

 @98T4L4Hfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, however with less focus on drug related or caused mental illness and more focus on dementia/alzheimer's and depression.

 @98FPFSYLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as there's money that's able to be given to provinces/territories, there has been consultation with them, and there have been standards/programs put in place to ensure efficiency of the given system.

 @96TBGHYfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, however it's more important to focus on getting results before putting in too much money.

 @8VJPY2Lfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9C44Q36from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

increase funding for mental health treatment and research, not funding to corporations with bogus mental health initiatives, the structure of some corporations cause mental health issues in individuals.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...