Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Province/Territory:

50 Replies

 @B43QV9Mfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Yes, these should also be co-ops where all renters are owners and have a say in evictions, repairs, mangement

 @B3QGP69from Ontario  answered…4wks4W

We don’t want to create undesirable ghettos for people to live in . High density buildings means smaller housing meaning for family’s lower quality of life so I would recommend this style of building for uni students due to them being 1 person but honestly if you want to be cost effective go ahead but it will en up being ghettos where people will live on cheap rent and bad housing , why not invest in helping these family’s or people find better housing with this money , the à out of aid depending on your situation again prioritizing family’s, old people and the handicapped.

 @B3FXT7CLiberalfrom Manitoba  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, if it’s purpose is affordable housing for people who cannot afford a single family dwelling, or if space is an issue in high density urban areas.

 @B38NWBTfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

I would rather old commercial buildings be converted for high density housing. For new constructions, they should be tiny homes. More people should have access to the privacy of their own home without having to share walls with other tenants, or be at the mercy of landlords or whoever is in charge.

 @9NSYVS2from British Columbia  answered…10mos10MO

 @9M2Z2Y4from California  answered…11mos11MO

 @9LSKKXCfrom Quebec  answered…11mos11MO

 @9LDLLSNfrom Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

I think they should if living situations are tuff / if the area is overpopulated, but if the area doesn't actually need it then I don't see the point in there funds going towards that when there are so many other things they could use the money on.

 @B2ZSZNSfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but in the form of a tax write-off for the interest or a percentage of the interest for a period of time (i.e. the first 10 years).

 @B2X3BQMfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Renovate abandond or unused buildings to create high density residential buildings while leaving more land for single family homes

 @B2Q2PLCfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

yes but not at the risk of lowering the value of houses in nice neighbourhoods, they should be built in lower middle class areas where it is still average safe place to live and the kids can go to good safe schools

 @B2LYYGRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

This is a municipal issue, not a federal issue, therefore should be dealt with in the municipal level only.

 @B2L42TMfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, the provincial planning laws should be review create two zones industrial and mixed uses zones. Abolish parking requirements and promote design that incentives walkability and public transportation.

 @B2J3VBFfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Within reason. If conditions are good, it reduces prices, and it is environmentally friendly and does not hinder with other residential buildings development.

 @B29PP76from Newfoundland  answered…3mos3MO

Yes with emphasis on the development of community with the addition of high density residential buildings.

 @B28SGLNfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3mos3MO

No because the corporations who build them do not offer affordable rents. They maximize their profits while receiving government subsidies

 @B244VCMfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

If you're going to subsidize places they all should be subsidized regardless of population. No one has control who where who moves where

 @9ZTXY87from Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, because we need to house the whole population more efficiently. But again, focus on city design and infrastructure first.

 @9ZKZVNLNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only in the interest of creating more affordable housing options and reducing the amount of condos.

 @9YNBMP4from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

 @9YJ9C4Yfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

 @9WPFLK6Liberalanswered…5mos5MO

No, townhouses, terraces houses, semi detached, etc but not high density. High density runs into it's own social issues.

 @9WK3LGVLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

would depend on the very definition of high density no one would like the government to go back like the 70's and rebuild the projects.

 @9VJLW4Gfrom Nova Scotia  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only for companies that are selling the condos and not renting them.

 @9VJ6C4Kfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

No, there is already too many rental co do building and townhouse complexes as is. This only increases population density and traffic.

 @9VFXZ6Xfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Yes but only empty or abandon buildings. Not current buildings that are in good shape and have tenants.

 @9TTY3LWfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you feel about converting historic or abandoned buildings into high-density housing, and do you think it preserves or erases history?

 @9YFJQZ9Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

I think abandoned buildings SHOULD be removed but not historic buildings. Historic buildings are historic for a reason, they drive the ecomony!

 @9T6R9BJfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

More housing availability yes, but higher density in already congested cities no.

 @9RQNPMRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…8mos8MO

Living in such places is not good for people. Increase employment and services in rural areas and build houses that enhance life quality there

 @9RGCB9Pfrom Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

I believe a mix is needed. The affordability of urbanization is harmful to densification. We need to slow urban sprawl in some cities where vacancy rates are high on high residency buildings or find a way to convert high density buildings from ownership to rentable housing. Home and condo ownership is beyond reach for many but the cost of living in urban centres is also too high.

 @9RF7MFBfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

 @9RC97PLNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only if certain ratios and quotas for floor space and family oriented homes are met.

 @9RC2QHKNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, and should be prioritised over single, family homes, especially in cities.q

 @9QXVJKCfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

 @9QW7TQZfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, make Single-family detached homes more expensive, since its unsustainable.

 @9P8NRFMNew Democratic from Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, higher density housing/communities can lower the risk of destruction of local ecosystems.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you think there's a stigma associated with living in high-density housing, and if so, what could change that perception?

 @B35PD2Qfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

yes but this should only happen in abandoned areas. not in current residential areas. Also a lot of planning should be done to not significantly increase road traffic. High density buildings should be built near public transit.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

In your opinion, could high-density residential buildings help solve housing affordability issues in your city? Why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you think the presence of high-density housing impacts the sense of community and neighborly connection in an area?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What personal advantages or disadvantages do you see in living in a high-density residential area compared to a more spacious, single-family home neighborhood?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you believe that the environment benefits more from high-density living situations than from suburban sprawl? Give reasons for your view.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Have you or someone you know ever experienced a change in neighborhood character due to new high-density developments? What was that like?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you envision the future of housing in big cities, and what role do you see high-density residential buildings playing in it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Considering your personal lifestyle, how well would you adapt to living in a high-density residential building, and what factors would influence your decision?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Would you prefer to live in a high-density residential building if it meant shorter commutes and more amenities? Why or why not?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...