High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@B43QV9M2wks2W
Yes, these should also be co-ops where all renters are owners and have a say in evictions, repairs, mangement
@B3QGP694wks4W
We don’t want to create undesirable ghettos for people to live in . High density buildings means smaller housing meaning for family’s lower quality of life so I would recommend this style of building for uni students due to them being 1 person but honestly if you want to be cost effective go ahead but it will en up being ghettos where people will live on cheap rent and bad housing , why not invest in helping these family’s or people find better housing with this money , the à out of aid depending on your situation again prioritizing family’s, old people and the handicapped.
Yes, if it’s purpose is affordable housing for people who cannot afford a single family dwelling, or if space is an issue in high density urban areas.
@B38NWBT1mo1MO
I would rather old commercial buildings be converted for high density housing. For new constructions, they should be tiny homes. More people should have access to the privacy of their own home without having to share walls with other tenants, or be at the mercy of landlords or whoever is in charge.
@9NSYVS210mos10MO
Yes and incentivize Housing Co-op's rather then private housing
@9M2Z2Y411mos11MO
Yes, as long as it is affordable housing and not luxury condominiums
@9LSKKXC11mos11MO
Yes, only if they are not luxury condos and are multi-purpose
@9LDLLSN12mos12MO
I think they should if living situations are tuff / if the area is overpopulated, but if the area doesn't actually need it then I don't see the point in there funds going towards that when there are so many other things they could use the money on.
@B2ZSZNS2mos2MO
Yes, but in the form of a tax write-off for the interest or a percentage of the interest for a period of time (i.e. the first 10 years).
@B2X3BQM2mos2MO
Renovate abandond or unused buildings to create high density residential buildings while leaving more land for single family homes
@B2Q2PLC2mos2MO
yes but not at the risk of lowering the value of houses in nice neighbourhoods, they should be built in lower middle class areas where it is still average safe place to live and the kids can go to good safe schools
@B2LYYGR2mos2MO
This is a municipal issue, not a federal issue, therefore should be dealt with in the municipal level only.
@B2L42TM2mos2MO
Yes, the provincial planning laws should be review create two zones industrial and mixed uses zones. Abolish parking requirements and promote design that incentives walkability and public transportation.
@B2J3VBF2mos2MO
Within reason. If conditions are good, it reduces prices, and it is environmentally friendly and does not hinder with other residential buildings development.
@B29PP763mos3MO
Yes with emphasis on the development of community with the addition of high density residential buildings.
@B28SGLN3mos3MO
No because the corporations who build them do not offer affordable rents. They maximize their profits while receiving government subsidies
@B244VCM4mos4MO
If you're going to subsidize places they all should be subsidized regardless of population. No one has control who where who moves where
@9ZTXY874mos4MO
Yes, because we need to house the whole population more efficiently. But again, focus on city design and infrastructure first.
@9ZKZVNLNew Democratic5mos5MO
Yes, but only in the interest of creating more affordable housing options and reducing the amount of condos.
@9YNBMP45mos5MO
Make rules and bureaucracy fairer and let the market sort it out.
@9YJ9C4Y5mos5MO
If it’s through repurposing old buildings/lot then sure
No, townhouses, terraces houses, semi detached, etc but not high density. High density runs into it's own social issues.
would depend on the very definition of high density no one would like the government to go back like the 70's and rebuild the projects.
@9VJLW4G6mos6MO
Yes, but only for companies that are selling the condos and not renting them.
@9VJ6C4K6mos6MO
No, there is already too many rental co do building and townhouse complexes as is. This only increases population density and traffic.
@9VFXZ6X6mos6MO
Yes but only empty or abandon buildings. Not current buildings that are in good shape and have tenants.
@9TTY3LW7mos7MO
More Single family homes should be built rather than apartment buildings.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
How do you feel about converting historic or abandoned buildings into high-density housing, and do you think it preserves or erases history?
@9YFJQZ9Conservative5mos5MO
I think abandoned buildings SHOULD be removed but not historic buildings. Historic buildings are historic for a reason, they drive the ecomony!
@9T6R9BJ7mos7MO
More housing availability yes, but higher density in already congested cities no.
@9RQNPMR8mos8MO
Living in such places is not good for people. Increase employment and services in rural areas and build houses that enhance life quality there
@9RGCB9P8mos8MO
I believe a mix is needed. The affordability of urbanization is harmful to densification. We need to slow urban sprawl in some cities where vacancy rates are high on high residency buildings or find a way to convert high density buildings from ownership to rentable housing. Home and condo ownership is beyond reach for many but the cost of living in urban centres is also too high.
@9RF7MFB8mos8MO
Only in places that don't hurt nature or historical locations.
@9RC97PLNew Democratic9mos9MO
Yes, but only if certain ratios and quotas for floor space and family oriented homes are met.
@9RC2QHKNew Democratic9mos9MO
Yes, and should be prioritised over single, family homes, especially in cities.q
@9QXVJKC9mos9MO
Change existing laws so that the market can supply adequate housing.
@9QW7TQZ9mos9MO
Yes, make Single-family detached homes more expensive, since its unsustainable.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 10mos10MO
Yes, higher density housing/communities can lower the risk of destruction of local ecosystems.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@B35PD2Q1mo1MO
yes but this should only happen in abandoned areas. not in current residential areas. Also a lot of planning should be done to not significantly increase road traffic. High density buildings should be built near public transit.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.