Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @4SCCFZVfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

We live in a patriarchal society; when Canada started doing "women in non traditional trades" they left out the other half of the equation which was to teach men how to multi task. Child rearing needs to be revered instead of being viewed as 'less than'. It is not just a universal child tax, we need a complete overhaul of wages to reflect the importance and tax breaks for people choosing to raise their own children instead of farming that out to a daycare.

 @4VPBQMLfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

No, women belong in the kitchen and should take care of her children at home

 @9GSJQ2Rfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

People not working, and taking up spots in subsidized daycares should fazed out for the working people.

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, a portion of it with provincial funding added on to it as well, as it is in the realm of education.

 @8RH6Y4Nfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Subsidize child care to an extent. Have stipulations in place that require the parent to actually have reason for it. No sense in paying for someone's child to go to day care when the parent is sitting at home on their ***

 @9TVQQC4from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

They should subsidize paternity and maternity leave in business. I do like the idea of subsidized child care as well, but being there for the baby is so important to their development.

 @9RVLJTZfrom New Brunswick  answered…5mos5MO

There should be direct transfers to parents in order to make the best decision which is best for them.

 @9KBFTYW from British Columbia  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only for low-income families, but the definition of "low-income" needs to be adjusted to reflect actual living income, not currently high enough.

 @9HCP7QVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

No. The reason people need help in the first place is due to high taxes and debt incurred by govt. we need less dependency on the state, not more. Eliminate all welfare programs and close the departments running them.

 @9FQ2ZJYfrom Yukon Territory  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, Support daycares but prefer subsidies and employment protection for parents who stay at home to take care of kids. Better for kids and this is what a lot of people want but can't afford.

 @9FQ2ZJYfrom Yukon Territory  answered…1yr1Y

Support daycares but prefer subsidies and employment protection for parents who stay at home to take care of kids. Better for kids and this is what a lot of people want but can't afford.

 @9FL5ZGXfrom Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

 @9F992B4Libertarianfrom Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

No. Tax less and leave my money in my pocket to provide child care to my kids

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Government should provide free day care to all children. Daycare shouldn't be something parents have to pay out of pocket for.

 @9F5FC8S from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Their federal government should subsidize child care for families that meet a mindful and appropriate guideline for need, which isn’t always limited to low income families. Families with more than three children should not qualify for subsidized child care, unless the family is blended or the third pregnancy resulted in multiples that are not the product of IVF. Private day care should continue to be available to families who choose it.

 @9DQSF44from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

 @9BRNCGJfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should provide financial incentives for women to become mothers and remove income taxes after 3 children like they do in Hungary

 @9BN6JRTfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No. This should be a line item in the federal transfer payments, with Provinces required to meet or exceed minimum standards with a limit for the maximum cost to parents. Accommodation for cross-provincial needs of border towns (wet Que - East Ont, for example) will be required.

 @96QP3KDfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

this is a short term solution to a long term problem. Because of how the economy is set up we live in a society were people cannot take care of their family. This is antinatalism at its finest

 @946LWWKfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @93KS3GSfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, because I don't trust the government to define low income reliably

 @939RLZMfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WMNMHRfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

increase wages so childcare is more accessible or people have the option to have 1 parent stay home and 1 work without financial strain

 @8VV5RXHfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

yes but only if they offer the choice for one parent to stay home with extended maternity/paternity benefits rather then put their child in daycare

 @8VV2P57from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VTLB8Vfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and it should be accessible to anyone regardless of income and the amounts subsidized should be based on income

 @8VLG9Z5from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VJDKSCfrom Quebec  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VHJ7JRfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VGHSCTfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VFNH6Pfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VDCXLMfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V6FCJJConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, de-regulate childcare, it will become more available and less expensive

 @8V6D6SYfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V2X3T3from Quebec  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TYWNDPNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @Steeviemacfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and increase child tax benefits, family allowances and implement a guaranteed basic income to support stay-at-home parenting.

  @8TXVXMLfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it's a Federal Matter. Leave it with communities and Provinces if they choose to push for it.

 @8TWTQB7from Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

Lower taxes for everyone so families can afford to pay for their own expenses

 @8TWQDTYfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TWMWWRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but geared-to-income rather than $10 and only for working parents, not for stay-at-home parents.

 @8TV9K36from British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TRZKDRfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but allow families the choice to between daycare or stay-at home parenting

 @8TRG7PQfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TNJXJKfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TJYVVKfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TJ5LNTfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

They can partially subsidize it, but not so that it is so low as $7 a day like in Quebec. Such a low rate is not sustainable.

 @8THB6T7Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No but it should make it more feasible for one parent to be able to stay home. There should be greater tax benefits for single income families.

 @8T452LXfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SLS73Sfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, encourage stay-at-home parenting (from a proud housewife that got refuse to remove it child From school because Quebec want to cash in more with their broken brainwashing's school system )

 @8SCKB7Wfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RXLK45from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RWBJNQfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

The government should offer some support, but mainly for federal employees, and instead encourage companies or buildings to offer it themself.

 @8QFLL9Yfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

No, child care should stay the same as is no matter anybody's situation.

 @8Q7NQF9from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If a single parent can earn enough as a breadwinner (minimum wage) for the family then child care becomes a choice not a requirement, therefore not requiring subsidization.

 @8PYFGKYfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PTB22Nfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Daycare fees should not only be lowered but regulated and paid at a salary ratio.

 @8PJVJTNConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No. The current child care benefit allows parents to make their own choices on how they want to use their benefits.

 @8JGRQCYfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8GTYCYJfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8FRYPJBfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but limit the amount the amount of kids that can receive the benefit to two children.

 @8F3X5KVfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8DC73B2from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D94JYDfrom New Brunswick  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D8S5H2from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9D36K4QLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but with provinces and other levels of government at the table to come to a consensus.

 @9CQJF7Lfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

 @99JNTRWConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Into a monitored fund insuring proper use of the money, with check ups a couple times a year to insure the child has good conditions. Not being overly strict with taking children away.

 @99J9L63from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but integrate child care into local institutions like school boards.

 @97QYQ2VCommunistfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8VFMVLRfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

More affordable daycare‘s. Or middle class should get some assistance as well

 @8TVYS42from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it should subsidize the creation of affordable childcare spaces to reduce the cost.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...