Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH12mos12MO
No
@9ZRTLKX5mos5MO
They shouldn't make lab grown meat due to the meat being unstable and having bacteria grown over time.
@9SXKSGMNew Democratic8mos8MO
There is no way that the chemicals used to create lab grown meat will have good long term effects for our body. So let’s prioritize putting that money back into farmers and livestock to create healthy, free ranged meat.
@B229GZL5mos5MO
If we can avoid killing animals and getting the same nutritional value, I don't know why you wouldn't be in favor of lab grown meat.
@B2CJYBH4mos4MO
The cultured cell is alive and prone to picking up infections or mutations, just the same as its ancestors did when they were in a live animal. However, unlike its ancestors, the cultured cell doesn’t have the protection of the immune system and wider body to keep things in check.
https://country-wide.co.nz/the-pros-and-cons-of-fake-meat/#:~:text=Cons%20of%20lab%2Dgrown%20meat&text=The%20cultured%20cell%20is%20alive,to%20keep%20things%20in%20check.
@ISIDEWITH12mos12MO
Yes
@9ZRTLKX5mos5MO
Lab grown meat is important due it could replace farming and open up many parts of land open for urbanization, energy, or other government projects.
@9MW8Y2BConservative11mos11MO
natural food is always best. lets not play with nature. this can be understood through natural catatrophes. that we should not mess with naturein any way.
@9RBYBX69mos9MO
It has been scientifically proven that there are cons to lab-grown meat compared to naturally farmed. I greatly disagree with this.
@9RBRS6M9mos9MO
The government should stop subsidizing meat and help fund other protein source production like redirecting soy feed from livestock to human food
@9R4QBMX10mos10MO
it depends, I would not eat it but some people might so as long as it is safe I would say within moderation.
@9Q7C6J310mos10MO
I believe that until the health risks and effects have been studied and are well known that the government should not allow the commercialization of lab-grown meat
@9MRWVG711mos11MO
Yes, to ensure proper tests and ethical procedures are done to ensure the safety of consumers.
No and yes if people feel more comfortable with lab grown then make it but I believe real meet will be better
@B2J775M3mos3MO
No, there is no way that the chemicals used to create lab-grown meat will have good long-term effects on our bodies. So let’s prioritize putting that money back into farmers and livestock to create healthy, free-range meat.
@B2CNQ6Z4mos4MO
No, return to sustainable farming practices and get commercial and science out of the food industry.
@B2BMK7B4mos4MO
Yes, but perform more studies first, & allow it as long as a disclosure is prominently displayed on packaging and restaurant menus
@B299V9W4mos4MO
NO. The human body is energetic and the non natural frequency of the meat will cause reactions/chronic illness/mental illness. if you understand homeostasis you will understand why this is a big NO. Mother Nature is healing while all man made frequencies is illness causing.
@B2574KFNew Democratic5mos5MO
I do not personally eat meat, though it's a good cause because the cow population will not be largely affected.
@9VRLFFN7mos7MO
needs more research but should be supported as long as packaging is clear about what the product contains
@9TMMVLNNew Democratic8mos8MO
yes as long as the lab-grown meat follows the same safety qualification tests as traditional livestock farming, there shouldn't be issue with doing so.
@9RQNPMR9mos9MO
Only if it will be more affordable and provide all the nutrients found in organic grass fed and have no toxic contents ,processes or byproducts.
@9RPDQJJ9mos9MO
Yes, assuming that the products are clearly labelled as such and undergo the same restrictions needing to be met as the standard supply.
@9RC2QHKNew Democratic9mos9MO
Yes, but it should be regulated to maintain a standard quality and prevent a monopoly on the industry.
@B23CRQ35mos5MO
No, we should only use natural means of obtaining food. Also, eliminate grocery chains and make them decentralized.
@9ZQV5PZ5mos5MO
Yes, as long as there is both wide agreement amongst independent research and health bodies that lab-grown meat is safe long-term for consumption and will reduce carbon emissions in total
@9WYDMSD6mos6MO
No, i do not trust it, the artificial growth of cells like that sounds like cancer cells and that can potentially cause a public health disaster. until there is more research into it with longterm studies on human health we should not allow it. but i do see how that can help lower costs of meat by increasing the supply of meat in our national food supply. could be a real way to achieve post scarcity which would be a net benefit to society.
@B52VL8Z2 days2D
This lab-grown meat shouldn't be needed. As consumers, we need to be more conscious of how much we are eating and consume less. There is already too much food waste.
@B4XHT627 days7D
No, the goverment should invest in local Canadian farmers ro ensure success and access to Canadian goods.
@B4W3M5B1wk1W
Yes, as long as research has been conducted over long amounts of time, with safety and regulation hazards in place, clear labeling, and alternative options as lab grown meat may have side affects that could affect the population long-term instead of immediately.
@B4RSSZ52wks2W
If the government gets involved they need to make it cost effective compared to meat, and it needs to be disclosed
@B4RH3X42wks2W
Get rid of meat altogether. It's a link in many diseases, environmental concerns, and there are non-animal related alternatives
@B3TPJMF2mos2MO
Eventually yes, but studies should be done with full public disclosure ensuring it's safety. Also disclosure should be displayed on packaging and menus.
@B3PTXTY2mos2MO
Don’t get me wrong it’s probably safe, and most likely tastes the same, however I’d still like to see a long term effects study done if possible. While I trust science, they make mistakes too
@B3MY9V32mos2MO
It should at least be tested and checked by the government before allowing other people to purchase it from a supermarket.
@B3G8KHQ2mos2MO
WTF is lab grown meat and what have I been eating it!?! Does packaging currently not have to disclose its not real meat. This should be illegal I'm not going to sleep tonight.
@B3FFKSX2mos2MO
Yes, but there needs to be disclosure and the goal should be lower prices for consumers and reduction of animal slaughter.
@B36JLNR2mos2MO
I know there is already an option for that but I just want to make a clarification just in case: do more long term studies to ensure safety and then commercialize it.
@B4LDPWB3wks3W
All meat should be banned. For the animals, for our health, for our economy and for our environment. Plant based meat is sufficient to fill our needs.
@B4LC5233wks3W
No, meat is not a necessity and should be banned. Plant meats taste just as good and are healthier. Also costs less on our healthcare system.
@B4KYYVNConservative3wks3W
No context for this question. How is it effecting our bodies over time? Do more research. Maybe if it’s better for our bodies and the planet.
@B4CV7Q64wks4W
I think we need to study long term effects from the meat and that it should be shown very clearly on all packaging
@B49LKNY1mo1MO
i dont think so, because it is unnatural and pumping our bodies full of lab food, instead of what we have been eating for 3000 plus years. it also puts our farmers at risk, and as a farmer we depend on the consumer to make money.
There should be more research in sustainable ways to lower environmental harm, as a concept this harms the farmers which is a large part of our economics.
@B48D94D1mo1MO
Until we understand the long term effects of this meat and understand exactly how it affects the economy, agriculture, and ecology, it should not be public
@9ZSWYD95mos5MO
I think there will come a time where its necessary to start using lab made meats, but until then id rather eat real meat.
@9MLXWMN12mos12MO
Allow commercialization while ensuring enough safety checks have been done through CFIA. Any potential health risks must be made publicly available and the manufacturer's must display such risks on their labels.
@B2S72SX3mos3MO
I find fast food reatorants need this for fast and mass production, but it is not something that we should give in to for any adverse in this.
@B286ZK4New Democratic4mos4MO
No. But we should focus more on local farmers instead of commercial farming, as generally it's the commercial farms that have animal suffering issues. More research is also needed to ensure safety
@9WNCQDSNew Democratic6mos6MO
Yes, but as studies are done to determine it's safety, and it is properly displaced on packaging and restaurant menus
Why would you eat something that is lab-grown? It just feels depressing when you don't eat actual meat... We should increase the amount of meat people eat, because some people lack the essential nutrients they need. The meat you get from the animal has more nutrients than lab-grown ones because the companies that make them don't tell you what is inside the lab-grown ones.
@9TP4MHS8mos8MO
The meat should be aprroved to be safe to eat, people must have a choice of wether or not, and further testing should be conducted even if sold to the public.
@9T42CXP8mos8MO
Yes and no, only ensured safe lab grown meat should be commercialized and other lab grown meat should be studied more to ensure safety of it
@9QSFSCC10mos10MO
Yes, but with proper regulation to ensure quality of nutrition is equivalent to naturally harvested meat.
@9QS4NW810mos10MO
Doesn't really matter, as this is a free country. If you want to commercialize something, you should. The fact that you even have to ask this question is ridiculous.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 11mos11MO
As long as lab-grown meat follows the same safety qualification tests as traditional livestock farming, there shouldn't be issue with doing so.
@9NZN9CH11mos11MO
Yes, only if it body stated wether it is real or lab grown.
@9NVYVQF11mos11MO
Yes, provided that there is transparency about the nutrition/health effects
@9NQ42RX11mos11MO
yes, as long as it is a safe, healthy and affordable alternative to real meat
@9NNN7FQ11mos11MO
They research it more and test it on people willing to eat it and see if their is any issues.
@9NKWLDM11mos11MO
No, let it be tested on further until it has been documented lab-grown meat will not affect the human body
@9NGVZF811mos11MO
I guess?? If not in excess it wouldn't take away from farmer jobs too much.
@9MZ37W711mos11MO
Yes, but it must be stated clearly on the packaged with full transparency
@9MVG8TW11mos11MO
Yes, and the government should fund research into the long term effects
@9MRY4V311mos11MO
Yes, but it should be regulated to ensure proper studies and tests are done down to ensure ethical practice to ensure consumer saftey
@9NZJ3SWNew Democratic11mos11MO
Yes, provided there is conclusive, independent research on the long-term health effects of consuming lab-grown meat.
@B2YXXYG3mos3MO
Absolutely not a good idea as all/any nutritional value would have to be added artificially, and we already know that artificial nutrition is damaging to our health.
@B546BJT1 day1D
Yes and there are no long term ill health effects to Public and must follow Canadian Food Health and Safety Regs
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@B2FXBYQ3mos3MO
Yes, for the people who cant eat real meat due to their beilefs or for any other resons that would like to.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.