Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
Yes
@9ZLMMLB4mos4MO
Electric vehicles are much too expensive. If the government is to mandate this, it will have to provide some sort of funding to help with both adding more electric charging stations and funding electric cars themselves.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
No, electric vehicle parts can be just as dangerous to the environment as emissions
@B32S2QZ3wks3W
Usually this point is based off of the emissions required to build new electric cars which I mean gas powered cars also have to be built so I don’t really see the issue. Plus the main take away from it should be that we need to reform more of the industries related to car manufacturing to reduce emissions further.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Yes, but only if it includes subsidies for low-income citizens to afford these vehicles
@9ZV77KC3mos3MO
Subsides are not the problem with electric vehicles ..THE problem is that this is not going to solve tge climate crisis. Electrical vehicles need to be charged and where does that power come from ? What level of pollutants are being expelled from just mining the lithium? This is doing nothing but making everything unaffordable. Not to mention the towing range and cold weather issues with evs ..NOT INTERESTED AT ALL !!
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
No, incentivize consumers and manufacturers instead of forcing them
@B3DSJ7H2wks2W
manufacturers have shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted to do the right thing. There is no evidence they will do so here. Combine that with the amount of disinformation surrounding EVs and you get a recipe for inaction.
@B3HTL751wk1W
I don’t have a car so I don’t care personally but I’m sure a lot of people will not like this.
@B3HJR9F1wk1W
The government should do whatever is recommended via research as the better option for the planet.
@B3CPZL72wks2W
Should the government of Israel prime minister open choices of free markings and electric reckers as required in progress issues by Ireland prime minister material said friendly humans right commissioner
Yes, and require all emissions based machinery to transition to clean energy, and provide subsidies for lower income citizens to afford these vehicles.
@B2W86PR4wks4W
More data needed on long term environmental effect of batteries
@B2Q2HTP1mo1MO
No, invest in the infrastructure to support large scale EV and hybrid uptake and incentivize buying EVs (i.e. the Norway approach)
@B29D9DTNew Democratic2mos2MO
No, this disproportionately will effect low income people
@B244VCM3mos3MO
No allergic vehicles are going to harm the environment just as bad as gas vehicles. Our electrical system can't handle the power we need now. Adding more will hermit more.
@9ZQRDT34mos4MO
The government should invest more money on public transport. Forcing people to transit is not the solution, instead, they have to use their vehicles a responsible way.
@9ZJG7774mos4MO
Only after adequate infrastructure is fully in place, which required government planning and investment
@9YK5BFQ4mos4MO
I think they should encourage it, but not enforce it.
If this refers to new models, then yes. However, people have the right to own older models, as many are fans of classic car shows.
@9WBRTKDNew Democratic5mos5MO
Yes, if EVs are affordable and there is the infrastructure to support it in place.
Yes, but increase the available infrastructures to accommodate for hybrid/electric vehicles.
@9VCMPDG5mos5MO
No, however making tech companies produce more affordable/maintainable electric vehicles (cars, trucks, bikes, etc) by a certain time so people would have more opportunities to purchase an electric vehicle.
@9V96H7W5mos5MO
Yea, and cars in general should be limited if public transport is sufficient
@9TPHDHG6mos6MO
Have hybrids more available in the more rural areas. Larger populated have more charging stations
@9TNBDV86mos6MO
Yes, but only if they ensure there are affordable options.
@9TBHMLT6mos6MO
Yes, if still affordable, and functional. Hybrid recovery systems for sure used.
Deleted6mos6MO
Yes, provided there's sufficient vehicle charging infrastructure that's similar in price or cheaper than gas/diesel
@9T34Y2F6mos6MO
While it’s a nice idea, Canada doesn’t have the infrastructure in place nor do we have the ability to supply the demand that will result from everyone driving electric.
@9SQVTGT6mos6MO
Find a source that works. Lithium and electric is no better.
@9SLJBJV7mos7MO
Make electric and hybrid options actually affordable to the now cash-strapped working class poor.
@9RBY87R8mos8MO
No, the government should allow the market to determine the evolution of carbon efficient vehicles
@9QVJ8SZ8mos8MO
Hybrid but maybe not electric until the technology develops further.
@9QQ98DN8mos8MO
implement better public transportation and make cities less car dependent
@9Q6LHXS8mos8MO
This should be a gradual requirement over many years as costs of electric and hybrid cars need to be anticipated by purchases - especially those who make minimum wages but who require transportation.
@B3QH5GF2 days2D
No, we should focus more on low emmision renewable combustion fuel
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@9V376WT6mos6MO
Yes but at a later date making gas car not get mad
@9ZK3JNS4mos4MO
No, we should mandate recycling in the automobile industry and with all new vehicles do what we can to decrease fuel consumption and invest in a new technology instead of lithium batteries to replace the combustion engine.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
