Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Province/Territory:

50 Replies

 @B3G5TN4New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Restrictions on things like screen size are fine, but I see no reason to ban technology that allows those with disabilities to drive.

 @B3CPZL7answered…2wks2W

Should the french president revolution in based is an speciois controlled advance issues by Italy prime minister prevented reliance for technical or ethier

 @B35Q7K5answered…3wks3W

Data sharing/personal tracking is becoming a bigger issue and should not leave people without the option of opting out

 @B34R5DSfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

they shouldn't restrict it but somewhat priorities human control and let people use technology sometimes.

 @B2LYYGRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…1mo1MO

No, and it should encourage autonomous vehicles, as long as drivers may choose/control the vehicle's level of autonomy.

 @B2CMT6Q  from Montana  answered…2mos2MO

Implementing technology in a vehicle does not necessarily mean that there isn't any aspect human input required to operate it.

 @9ZXWXP2from Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes and no, I think PWDs can rely with this technology to fully live their lives outside of their disabilities but at the same time yes, to those who are normal mentally and physically. Also there's need to be more intial tests with regards to these vehicles. Although I understand that prevention is better than cure, we cannot fully rely to these advanced vehicles. we need both attention and technology.

 @9XQKGCVfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

It depends on the specific technology. Ultimately people need to control the speed, braking and steering of the vehicle.

 @9XCFZ4Zfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

The risk of vehicles malfunctioning following a bad update or hacking attempt is too high. Human control (or at least, human override) is of importance

 @9W9559QGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

It really depends on what they restrict, yes they shouldn't let ai do everything, but its a part of the evolution of technology so we need it to advance.

 @9W6MWH2Liberalfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, they should only restrict it for people who don't have physical disabilities and increase the use of advanced technology for the physically disabled

 @9W4QXDCNew Democraticfrom New York  answered…5mos5MO

To a point. Undeniably helpful things like rear view cameras should be maintained, but A.I. tools require significantly more development

 @9W2H8G6Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

They should reduce things like self-driving cars to prevent car accidents, but let people continue to build cars that are better for the environment.

 @9VZYXLMfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

I think that they should add future technologies in vehicles but when the car is in motion the screen should be turned off

 @9VYXS7LNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, the government should regulate the use of advanced technologies in vehicles in moderation in order to meet safety standards while remaining engaged in current technologies.

 @9VYQPBRConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Vehicles should remain human operated but advancements in camera technologies, mobile connectivity, sensors, etc. are fine.

 @9VWRXVTfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

It is either a full system is implemented where all driving is automated, which would effectively significantly decrease traffic times as the AI system will be able to predict all movements and it would bring the death ratio to nearly 0 or we don’t have it at all

 @9VSPPZLfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5mos5MO

when there isnt an emergancy technology should be used to drive, however when an emergency arises the human pilot (universal term for driver) should have control and MUST be properly trained and have yearly tests.

 @9VPNGYRfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

 @9VMM6BBfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

 @9VKMP3Gfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

the end goal for advanced technology and artificial intelligence was to make it so that humans no longer have to do the manual labour and can focus on art and love and other things that give us happiness over scanning groceries. in terms of vehicles i see a future wherein most cars are self driven and manual cars become a commodity and require a special license to operate.

 @9VK2G4Jfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

 @9TTHJVPfrom Nova Scotia  answered…6mos6MO

 @9TLDMJLfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

No but over use should be restricted as it brings to question human safety.

 @9TLDKTRfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Restrict some but not all of the technology usage and periodically train/test the driver's ability without technology as a requirement to keep their driver's license

 @9T9MWWFfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

 @9S4J7GXfrom Nova Scotia  answered…7mos7MO

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

currently, safe vehicles have so many safety features that they could no longer be considered safe.

 @9RXS4P4 from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

not necessarily to fully restrict but make sure there is no over reliance on technology

 @9RDS9RZfrom British Columbia  answered…8mos8MO

No but they should make sure it's modular so the driver may choose if they want it or not. That said, dash cams should be standard issue.

 @9RBVFQQfrom Prince Edward Island  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, all machines should still maintain a human compatible interface in order to assume control in the case of an emergency.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Yes but only if the technology isn't more capable than the human driver. Once technology because better drivers than humans then no

 @9QW7TQZfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

No, allow people to rely on technology as it can provide a minimum access to a standard of safety on roads.

 @9QSF59Ffrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

 @9QQHX9Lfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

 @9P8NRFMNew Democratic from Alberta  answered…9mos9MO

No, as long as the advanced technology prioritises human safety and does not compromise all elements of driver input.

 @9MKYHZ7from Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

No, as long as the technology is proven to make driving safer and not as a way to replace drivers or driving skill entirely

 @B3PTXTYfrom Alberta  answered…2 days2D

Most of the tech is for people who wanna go somewhere but don’t really wanna drive, it’s cool but it’s still in its infancy and much more work needs to be done, I don’t think the government should be trying to remove that tech in the future either

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you feel about driving a car that can make decisions on its own, like braking or steering away from obstacles?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you think advanced car technologies could change the way our cities look and how we design roads?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

In a future where cars can fully drive themselves, what skills do you think drivers should still learn and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think having more automated features in cars makes drivers too reliant on technology and less skilled?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Imagine a car that gets software updates like a smartphone; what fears or excitements does this idea bring to you?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How much do you trust technology with your safety compared to a human's decision-making while driving?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If cars could drive themselves to any destination, what would be your biggest concern about not being in control?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you believe that the benefits of advanced automotive technologies outweigh the risks of losing human touch in driving?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Would you prefer a self-driving car to save you time on your commute, even if it means giving up some control over the vehicle?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Reflect on a time technology failed you; how does that experience shape your view on relying on technology for transportation?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...