Should the government restrict the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control and prevent over-reliance on technology?

No

Yes and no, I think PWDs can rely with this technology to fully live their lives outside of their disabilities but at the same time yes, to those who are normal mentally and physically. Also there's need to be more intial tests with regards to these vehicles. Although I understand that prevention is better than cure, we cannot fully rely to these advanced vehicles. we need both attention and technology.

It depends on the specific technology. Ultimately people need to control the speed, braking and steering of the vehicle.

The risk of vehicles malfunctioning following a bad update or hacking attempt is too high. Human control (or at least, human override) is of importance

It really depends on what they restrict, yes they shouldn't let ai do everything, but its a part of the evolution of technology so we need it to advance.

Yes, they should only restrict it for people who don't have physical disabilities and increase the use of advanced technology for the physically disabled

To a point. Undeniably helpful things like rear view cameras should be maintained, but A.I. tools require significantly more development

They should reduce things like self-driving cars to prevent car accidents, but let people continue to build cars that are better for the environment.

I think that they should add future technologies in vehicles but when the car is in motion the screen should be turned off

No, the government should regulate the use of advanced technologies in vehicles in moderation in order to meet safety standards while remaining engaged in current technologies.

Vehicles should remain human operated but advancements in camera technologies, mobile connectivity, sensors, etc. are fine.

It is either a full system is implemented where all driving is automated, which would effectively significantly decrease traffic times as the AI system will be able to predict all movements and it would bring the death ratio to nearly 0 or we don’t have it at all

when there isnt an emergancy technology should be used to drive, however when an emergency arises the human pilot (universal term for driver) should have control and MUST be properly trained and have yearly tests.

Let the technology develop before we decide to start restricting things

Laws should be in place before allowing any kind of new tech

the end goal for advanced technology and artificial intelligence was to make it so that humans no longer have to do the manual labour and can focus on art and love and other things that give us happiness over scanning groceries. in terms of vehicles i see a future wherein most cars are self driven and manual cars become a commodity and require a special license to operate.

Yes, at least until the technology becomes better.

No, but it should be heavily regulated and monitored.

No but over use should be restricted as it brings to question human safety.

Restrict some but not all of the technology usage and periodically train/test the driver's ability without technology as a requirement to keep their driver's license

No, but advanced technology should be heavily tested before usage.

Not if technology proves to be safer than human operation.

currently, safe vehicles have so many safety features that they could no longer be considered safe.

not necessarily to fully restrict but make sure there is no over reliance on technology

No but they should make sure it's modular so the driver may choose if they want it or not. That said, dash cams should be standard issue.

Yes, all machines should still maintain a human compatible interface in order to assume control in the case of an emergency.

Yes but only if the technology isn't more capable than the human driver. Once technology because better drivers than humans then no

No, allow people to rely on technology as it can provide a minimum access to a standard of safety on roads.

shouldnt be over relient but technological advances are good

I believe humans should uphold skills while implementing technology.

No, as long as the advanced technology prioritises human safety and does not compromise all elements of driver input.

No, as long as the technology is proven to make driving safer and not as a way to replace drivers or driving skill entirely

How would you feel about driving a car that can make decisions on its own, like braking or steering away from obstacles?

Reflect on a time technology failed you; how does that experience shape your view on relying on technology for transportation?

How do you think advanced car technologies could change the way our cities look and how we design roads?

In a future where cars can fully drive themselves, what skills do you think drivers should still learn and why?

Do you think having more automated features in cars makes drivers too reliant on technology and less skilled?

Imagine a car that gets software updates like a smartphone; what fears or excitements does this idea bring to you?

How much do you trust technology with your safety compared to a human's decision-making while driving?

If cars could drive themselves to any destination, what would be your biggest concern about not being in control?

Do you believe that the benefits of advanced automotive technologies outweigh the risks of losing human touch in driving?

Would you prefer a self-driving car to save you time on your commute, even if it means giving up some control over the vehicle?