This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@9XQKGCV3wks3W
It depends on the specific technology. Ultimately people need to control the speed, braking and steering of the vehicle.
@9XCFZ4Z3wks3W
The risk of vehicles malfunctioning following a bad update or hacking attempt is too high. Human control (or at least, human override) is of importance
It really depends on what they restrict, yes they shouldn't let ai do everything, but its a part of the evolution of technology so we need it to advance.
Yes, they should only restrict it for people who don't have physical disabilities and increase the use of advanced technology for the physically disabled
@9W4QXDCNew Democratic1mo1MO
To a point. Undeniably helpful things like rear view cameras should be maintained, but A.I. tools require significantly more development
They should reduce things like self-driving cars to prevent car accidents, but let people continue to build cars that are better for the environment.
@9VZYXLM1mo1MO
I think that they should add future technologies in vehicles but when the car is in motion the screen should be turned off
@9VYXS7LNew Democratic1mo1MO
No, the government should regulate the use of advanced technologies in vehicles in moderation in order to meet safety standards while remaining engaged in current technologies.
@9VYQPBRConservative1mo1MO
Vehicles should remain human operated but advancements in camera technologies, mobile connectivity, sensors, etc. are fine.
@9VWRXVT1mo1MO
It is either a full system is implemented where all driving is automated, which would effectively significantly decrease traffic times as the AI system will be able to predict all movements and it would bring the death ratio to nearly 0 or we don’t have it at all
@9VSPPZL1mo1MO
when there isnt an emergancy technology should be used to drive, however when an emergency arises the human pilot (universal term for driver) should have control and MUST be properly trained and have yearly tests.
@9VPNGYR1mo1MO
Let the technology develop before we decide to start restricting things
@9VMM6BB1mo1MO
Laws should be in place before allowing any kind of new tech
@9VKMP3G2mos2MO
the end goal for advanced technology and artificial intelligence was to make it so that humans no longer have to do the manual labour and can focus on art and love and other things that give us happiness over scanning groceries. in terms of vehicles i see a future wherein most cars are self driven and manual cars become a commodity and require a special license to operate.
@9VK2G4J2mos2MO
Yes, at least until the technology becomes better.
@9TTHJVP2mos2MO
No, but it should be heavily regulated and monitored.
@9TLDMJL2mos2MO
No but over use should be restricted as it brings to question human safety.
@9TLDKTR2mos2MO
Restrict some but not all of the technology usage and periodically train/test the driver's ability without technology as a requirement to keep their driver's license
@9T9MWWF2mos2MO
No, but advanced technology should be heavily tested before usage.
@9S4J7GX3mos3MO
Not if technology proves to be safer than human operation.
@9RZPX673mos3MO
currently, safe vehicles have so many safety features that they could no longer be considered safe.
@9RXS4P4 4mos4MO
not necessarily to fully restrict but make sure there is no over reliance on technology
@9RDS9RZ4mos4MO
No but they should make sure it's modular so the driver may choose if they want it or not. That said, dash cams should be standard issue.
@9RBVFQQ4mos4MO
Yes, all machines should still maintain a human compatible interface in order to assume control in the case of an emergency.
@9QZCYDN4mos4MO
Yes but only if the technology isn't more capable than the human driver. Once technology because better drivers than humans then no
@9QW7TQZ4mos4MO
No, allow people to rely on technology as it can provide a minimum access to a standard of safety on roads.
@9QSF59F5mos5MO
shouldnt be over relient but technological advances are good
@9QQHX9L5mos5MO
I believe humans should uphold skills while implementing technology.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 5mos5MO
No, as long as the advanced technology prioritises human safety and does not compromise all elements of driver input.
@9MKYHZ76mos6MO
No, as long as the technology is proven to make driving safer and not as a way to replace drivers or driving skill entirely
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.