This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@B4RT24G2wks2W
Very neutral on this. Need balance of both human control and advanced technology to accommodate both tech and non-tech savvy
@B4RDC5V2wks2W
The technology is good—but it should be more hands-free, because at the moment there is still a lot of distraction happening.
It really depends on what they restrict, yes they shouldn't let ai do everything, but its a part of the evolution of technology so we need it to advance.
Yes, they should only restrict it for people who don't have physical disabilities and increase the use of advanced technology for the physically disabled
@9W4QXDCNew Democratic6mos6MO
To a point. Undeniably helpful things like rear view cameras should be maintained, but A.I. tools require significantly more development
They should reduce things like self-driving cars to prevent car accidents, but let people continue to build cars that are better for the environment.
@9VZYXLM7mos7MO
I think that they should add future technologies in vehicles but when the car is in motion the screen should be turned off
@9VYXS7LNew Democratic7mos7MO
No, the government should regulate the use of advanced technologies in vehicles in moderation in order to meet safety standards while remaining engaged in current technologies.
@9VYQPBRConservative7mos7MO
Vehicles should remain human operated but advancements in camera technologies, mobile connectivity, sensors, etc. are fine.
@9VWRXVT7mos7MO
It is either a full system is implemented where all driving is automated, which would effectively significantly decrease traffic times as the AI system will be able to predict all movements and it would bring the death ratio to nearly 0 or we don’t have it at all
@9VSPPZL7mos7MO
when there isnt an emergancy technology should be used to drive, however when an emergency arises the human pilot (universal term for driver) should have control and MUST be properly trained and have yearly tests.
@9VPNGYR7mos7MO
Let the technology develop before we decide to start restricting things
@9VMM6BB7mos7MO
Laws should be in place before allowing any kind of new tech
@9VKMP3G7mos7MO
the end goal for advanced technology and artificial intelligence was to make it so that humans no longer have to do the manual labour and can focus on art and love and other things that give us happiness over scanning groceries. in terms of vehicles i see a future wherein most cars are self driven and manual cars become a commodity and require a special license to operate.
@9VK2G4J7mos7MO
Yes, at least until the technology becomes better.
@9TTHJVP7mos7MO
No, but it should be heavily regulated and monitored.
@9TLDMJL8mos8MO
No but over use should be restricted as it brings to question human safety.
@9TLDKTR8mos8MO
Restrict some but not all of the technology usage and periodically train/test the driver's ability without technology as a requirement to keep their driver's license
@9T9MWWF8mos8MO
No, but advanced technology should be heavily tested before usage.
@9S4J7GX9mos9MO
Not if technology proves to be safer than human operation.
@9RZPX679mos9MO
currently, safe vehicles have so many safety features that they could no longer be considered safe.
@9RXS4P4 9mos9MO
not necessarily to fully restrict but make sure there is no over reliance on technology
@9RDS9RZ9mos9MO
No but they should make sure it's modular so the driver may choose if they want it or not. That said, dash cams should be standard issue.
@9RBVFQQ9mos9MO
Yes, all machines should still maintain a human compatible interface in order to assume control in the case of an emergency.
@9QZCYDN10mos10MO
Yes but only if the technology isn't more capable than the human driver. Once technology because better drivers than humans then no
@9QW7TQZ10mos10MO
No, allow people to rely on technology as it can provide a minimum access to a standard of safety on roads.
@9QSF59F10mos10MO
shouldnt be over relient but technological advances are good
@9QQHX9L10mos10MO
I believe humans should uphold skills while implementing technology.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 11mos11MO
No, as long as the advanced technology prioritises human safety and does not compromise all elements of driver input.
@9MKYHZ712mos12MO
No, as long as the technology is proven to make driving safer and not as a way to replace drivers or driving skill entirely
@B43QV9M1mo1MO
No, but the government should also ban privatized road testing and licensing. Also there should be a drivers test every decade
@B3PTXTY2mos2MO
Most of the tech is for people who wanna go somewhere but don’t really wanna drive, it’s cool but it’s still in its infancy and much more work needs to be done, I don’t think the government should be trying to remove that tech in the future either
@B3G5TN4New Democratic2mos2MO
Restrictions on things like screen size are fine, but I see no reason to ban technology that allows those with disabilities to drive.
@B3CPZL72mos2MO
Should the french president revolution in based is an speciois controlled advance issues by Italy prime minister prevented reliance for technical or ethier
@B35Q7K52mos2MO
Data sharing/personal tracking is becoming a bigger issue and should not leave people without the option of opting out
@B34R5DS2mos2MO
they shouldn't restrict it but somewhat priorities human control and let people use technology sometimes.
@B2LYYGR3mos3MO
No, and it should encourage autonomous vehicles, as long as drivers may choose/control the vehicle's level of autonomy.
@B2CMT6Q 4mos4MO
Implementing technology in a vehicle does not necessarily mean that there isn't any aspect human input required to operate it.
@9ZXWXP25mos5MO
Yes and no, I think PWDs can rely with this technology to fully live their lives outside of their disabilities but at the same time yes, to those who are normal mentally and physically. Also there's need to be more intial tests with regards to these vehicles. Although I understand that prevention is better than cure, we cannot fully rely to these advanced vehicles. we need both attention and technology.
@9XQKGCV6mos6MO
It depends on the specific technology. Ultimately people need to control the speed, braking and steering of the vehicle.
@9XCFZ4Z6mos6MO
The risk of vehicles malfunctioning following a bad update or hacking attempt is too high. Human control (or at least, human override) is of importance
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
