Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Electoral District (2011):
@9F5KZ4N1yr1Y
There should be a balance
@9G9VSBW1yr1Y
the evolution of rewnable energy should not but governed by the federal goverment allowing more private companys to develop and receive benifits to develop new and effincent sources
@9G8ZNRK1yr1Y
for me its hard because we need for save the planet but the materials for this ones are hard to get and you have to mine for get the minerals for that
@9G48HWN1yr1Y
Yes, the federal government subsidize the production and consumption of renewable energy sources for as long as it did non-renewable energy sources
@9FQ5KS81yr1Y
This would be on a not for profit basis.
@9FQ2ZJY1yr1Y
Yes, but only if they are reiably good long term solutions. Otherwise, fund research into green alternatives that actually make sense in canada.
@9FPG8CX1yr1Y
Yes and No. Yes towards renewable energy sources that works and is the most cost-effective. No to energy sources that does not work.
@9FP3MRZ1yr1Y
no f***ing clue what this means in my almost non-existent brain
@9FMR4251yr1Y
The government should have a division that examines the proposals and buys into the companies that look the best. No endless subsidies, they get a piece of the business for their investment.
@9FM6SK61yr1Y
Yes, if it includes nuclear energy.
@9FL3H4H1yr1Y
@9FKQLF31yr1Y
@9FK3Y88Conservative1yr1Y
I do not understand what this entails
@9FFRDFV1yr1Y
There must be a proportionate subsidies to prop up new technology
@9FF5G761yr1Y
It should find more education on nuclear energy and more nuclear energy facilities
@9FDQJPT1yr1Y
i am satisfied with the current results for now
@9FC3VVH1yr1Y
Yes, but only if it’s in our budget
@9FBWSLQ1yr1Y
No, but nuclear power development and current hydroelectric infrastructure should be supported
@9FBD8RW1yr1Y
no we should try to make it easier to get
@9F992B4Libertarian1yr1Y
Allow the free market to decide
@9F8NFLR1yr1Y
im in between due to the fact you still mine rescuorces for batteries like how you mine for coal.
@9F88MH41yr1Y
Yes, but only a small percentage of the peoples taxes should be used. Though only if the current taxes do not get raised.
@9F7YHTGConservative1yr1Y
Nuclear is the only way.
@8LHNDWH4yrs4Y
@9WGXHQL2mos2MO
NO, if someone's own energy the government should not be controlling that and how much energy people use it's none of the government's business.
@9V254RM3mos3MO
I think that the renewable energy sources are something to be used on a small scale not a large one, so I wouldn't mind some funding but not a pile of money
@9TWK4RLConservative3mos3MO
To a certain degree. Renewable energy is good but we shouldn't completely move away from fossil fuels. I believe Nuclear is also a very clean energy source.
@9TQD73XConservative3mos3MO
yes but they should also lower regulation on the production and consumption for large corporations and other companies sso that our country can take advantage of our vast resources however it should be reasonable
@9TGBW8CConservative3mos3MO
No, because there is no adequate renewable energy source that will sufficiently supply the country as well as oil and gas.
@9RZPX675mos5MO
energy is generally the concern of provinces, so no. the federal government is overreaching with their current policy and should only be stepping in due to the event of catastrophic failures/shortages. provincial governments need to do better and should be the ones incentivizing energy companies.
@9RQNPMR5mos5MO
They should subsidize innovation and production of Canadian made green tech They should penalize the production and consumption of dirty energy if there is an alternative. Green washing should be discouraged. All essential services such as power production in provinces need to be owned by the people or run on the future guardian model (Patrick DeFlufy) all profit needs to be reinvested in efficiency and innovation there is no room left for share holder payouts and ceo bonuses anymore. The system can't take having the top creamed off we need to make Canada a better place for future generations
@9R72MJH5mos5MO
The government should subsidize the production only as that way the product will naturally be cheaper
@9QQGY8RConservative6mos6MO
Many so-called "renewable" energy sources are not very good. The government should subsidize the use of rooftop solar panels for homeowners.
@9NJKGTB7mos7MO
I believe that renewable energies would be a good thing if they weren't so expensive and our government would need to spend money it doesn't have on renewable energy sources
@9MY8CRV7mos7MO
Yes we should invest in other forms of energy as long as it doesn’t pass a huge burden onto the tax payer. We shouldn’t be phasing out fossil fuels until we have infrastructure in place to do so or at least cut down the use of wasting our non renewables as energy. Oil is a very important commodity and it is not infinite.
@9MGWNDZ7mos7MO
Having electric cars means having to dig up more of the battery sources and that is destroying the earth and the gas we use for our cars is less destructive and we have no other use for it where the battery for cars can be used for other things.
NO! The government should not favor any industry over another or any sector of a particular industry over another. Let free markets dictate what form or forms of transportation anyone uses. The carbon tax must be eliminated immediately. Vehicles and heavy equipment already have substantial pollution controls.
@9L7D6G49mos9MO
Yes however the current sources of energy such as fossil fuel must not be disregarded. Instead of heavily relying on fossil fuels, the aim for energy consumption should be at least 40% renewable energy
@9KBWSK810mos10MO
No, the government doesn’t have the understanding required to assess the impacts of “renewables”. It will also make the industry reliant on subsidies
@9KBFTYW 10mos10MO
No, if the companies are private they should be allowed to succumb to the same economic factors that influence the rest of the economy. Energy production for individual consumers should be low cost for citizens since it is produced with our country's resources. Buildings for corporations should be required to produce or contribute to the production of energy through environmentally sustainable means.
@9JST8CMConservative11mos11MO
I believe renewable energy sources are a good idea, except for the the fact that producing them has an impact on the environment when the government says it’s a big enough issue already
@9HXHTR412mos12MO
Yes only if the the gouvernement takes in consideration the amount of pollution the business is producing and their intentions.
they should start making it mandatory that if a certain company's carbon emmisions are too high they need to start using more renewable sources of energy
@9HGG7VG1yr1Y
So basically if Opposite Day then renewable is not renewable and then whole energy sphincter will to boom like big bang
@9H8Y45L1yr1Y
keep oil alive and make me money. the government should invest in renewable sources but also keep the oil industry alive as alot of countries still use oil to function
@9H6W47H1yr1Y
The federal government should use revenue from carbon taxes and related to invest in R&D and efficiency improvements to hydro and energy storage systems
@9GRZW9K1yr1Y
Not entirely. Some investment should be made, but companies should be provided incentives to become increasingly eco-friendly, especially on an international scale with regulations.
@9GPTJ2D1yr1Y
No, producers of non-renewable energy sources should be taxed to incentivize them to transition to the production of renewable energy sources.
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
We can certainly help with grants in the national interest, to expand renewable energy and make it more accessible for businesses.
@9GH2KFF1yr1Y
No. If we run out of energy sources in the future it will be the job of the people in the future to figure out a solution.
@9F6YRJ81yr1Y
Yes, but not all over every peice of land
@9F5KMPV1yr1Y
The government should be funding renewable and green energy. Sustainable energy is worth investigating time , effort and money into.
@9F4JC5Z1yr1Y
Support but continue to use fossil fuels as well
@9F483XWConservative1yr1Y
The government should help to support and incentivize companies in this field.
@9F2TWBY1yr1Y
I am uneducated on this promt.
@9F2MK7G1yr1Y
Provide more incentives for renewable energy production
@9DZXBYSConservative1yr1Y
Maybe as long as it’s nuclear.
@9DZPXF51yr1Y
Nuclear is good, solar is ok, but not wind
@9DYV2PR1yr1Y
It should subsidize only to the extent that is reasonable both the parties.
@9DXHB5C1yr1Y
If they haven’t already done this there is a problem. Bc why are we paying carbon tax. Problem is we aren’t large emitters of carbon. Other countries are. Yet we pay. And it basically goes to debt bc of mass spending.
@9DTRY3M1yr1Y
It depends on the type of energy
@9DK3RYT1yr1Y
No, but the provincial governments should, according to the economic needs of the province.
@9DCWDPP1yr1Y
No, large businesses should be required to offset their emissions through the subsidy of renewable energy
@9D8CGP71yr1Y
This depends on if the renewable energy they are switching to is actually "green" or if we are just making problems for other areas. Eg. Solar panels using rare earth metals that need to be mined in other countries that destroy rain forests and use child labour to attain them.
@9D6KK9V1yr1Y
Yes, but use the carbon tax as the primary or sole source of funding
@9CBTBW32yrs2Y
Yes, subsidize the installation of local/individual solar/wind apparatus to reduce the dependance on current methods and pass the savings on to home owners/renters who participate.
@8SXWSLJNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but also subsidize nuclear energy.
@9D2TKFS1yr1Y
Once battery and renewable technology is better, yes
@9CLJFYR1yr1Y
Yes, but the subsidies should not be extremally large. That money is better spent elsewhere, such as providing more funding for education and health care.
@9CLFQKX1yr1Y
same answer as the previous 2
@9BWP6T82yrs2Y
If the project works then yes.
@9BWGCTW2yrs2Y
It depends on the circumstance that the energy is being used for
@9BM52LG2yrs2Y
Yes, but work up to the conclusion not just “go cold turkey”
@9BKQH722yrs2Y
only if the project is proven to be successful
@9BKK3RM2yrs2Y
Yes, but only to supply lower income families to reduce their cost of living through solar/wind/hydro. The wealthy can already choose to use renewable energy sources so why subsidize them?
@9B2WXK42yrs2Y
It depends on the area some areas can't afford to get rid of these resources so get funding to give those areas alternatives then yes
@99Q6H5H2yrs2Y
i am uneducated on this issue.
@96ZYY3JConservative2yrs2Y
Yes. But don’t totally cut out current energy resources. Transition takes time.
@96ZKLX72yrs2Y
Develop a long term strategy that allows fossil fuels to be eliminated over time
@96N6ZCV2yrs2Y
Depends on the recourse cost to make said energy source
@96MGYLR2yrs2Y
@96JQJPS2yrs2Y
No, hybrid energies should be subsidized.
@96GVSNP2yrs2Y
Yes, if the federal government has the budget for it.
@96CZK5H2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should not need a great deal of money.
@96CYT572yrs2Y
Yes, because electricity can't be created and everything that is run by electricity will be shut down.
@96C34PN2yrs2Y
Issue credits or tax breaks to end users of renewable
@96BL9ZZConservative2yrs2Y
@966V6CZConservative2yrs2Y
No. Subsidize nuclear and natural gas power sources.
@9645TY32yrs2Y
Yes, to a certain extent.
@9623N532yrs2Y
subsidize production but not consumption
@95ZWDQ52yrs2Y
Yes, and become a leader for new energy sources showing initiative.
@95YV5GFConservative2yrs2Y
Should invest in nuclear rather than the renewable options
@95WDW5G2yrs2Y
Yes, in ways of tax breaks for corporations that use renewable energy
@95N9GV62yrs2Y
switch completely to renewable
@95N7VRR2yrs2Y
Yes but it should be cost efficient, and easy on the tax money.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.