CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@B47K95K2wks2W
Though a small amount of regulation should be enforced, it should maintain a certain amount of reasonable malleability within its restrictions if it is impeding the necessary progression of its research.
@B47D32W2wks2W
Yes, but only for ethical safety reasons. Regulation cannot be allowed to hamper the progress of such a critical and valuable technology.
No, not currently, however regulation should always be an option on the table to use quickly at the first sign of unsafe or unethical use
@B3BWBNC1mo1MO
Depends on the type of modification. If we are using CRISPR with IVF to correct disease, I strongly support it. I am more against it if it is in relation to “designer babies”
@B28V8393mos3MO
I think as long as it is used in a positive matter, like to prevent genetic malfunctions in a child.
@9QZTDKH9mos9MO
Yes only if the technology is proven to be safe for use, because then it would be like taking a medical surgery for a health issue.
@9QW7TQZ9mos9MO
Yes, and nationalize it to make sure it is regulated properly and consistently.
@9PGWNV410mos10MO
Yes, it should only be used to prevent disabilities.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 10mos10MO
Yes, as long as CRISPR technology is safe and suitable for use.
@9NLZHKS10mos10MO
if is regulated strictly and used for those who need it like people with immunity problems and not the highest bidder
@9NJMFYZ10mos10MO
I agree with the idea of genetically modifying people but private companies should be in control of that because the government will just millitarize it
Yes, but only after the CRISPR technology is suitable for use.
@9NJKGTB10mos10MO
There should be no gender reassignment surgeries allowed
@9MXNDX311mos11MO
Maybe to fix any diseases or genetic differences and maybe to prevent disease from occurring in the human body but not to change a person.
@9FGSKLL 11mos11MO
Yes, but only moderate regulation so that a corporate monopoly can not happen
@9MSXW7RNew Democratic11mos11MO
No, further studies and information to public needs to be released.
@9MP7X29Conservative11mos11MO
No, adding chemicals to children to make them "better", as well as the possible mistakes, makes me completely disagree with the regulation.
@9MP6SK211mos11MO
up to the people if they want to change there kids and not others
@9MP6H7P11mos11MO
I think that's weird and shouldn't be allowed unless it's used to prevent illness or something life-threatening.
@9MN6QYS11mos11MO
yes, as long as it is known and approved by the people it is going to affect
@9ZVXBWM4mos4MO
I think there should be some restrictions to ensure that there is not too much regulation that could cause problems.
@9SNLZ3S8mos8MO
Only for the benefit of communal health for all citizens and residents if they are required to have an organ transplant or genetic modification for better quality of life or to avoid death.
@9RXS4P4 8mos8MO
i feel like more research has to be done on the long term effects, and more risks should be eliminated before the use of CRISPR technology should become regulated.
@9RJ6K3V9mos9MO
Yes, but all citizens should be ensured they have the inherent right to refuse medical treatments at all times.
@9RCBSYB9mos9MO
The government should regulate CRISPR with an eye to not regulating to the point of stifling innovation and scientific progress.
@9RBVFQQ9mos9MO
Yes, but not too much. CRISPR has the potential to be transformative for the entirety of the human race and should be embraced as such.
@9RBPNXJ9mos9MO
They should start thinking about how to properly do this. However it's important to remember genetic diversity is ultimately humanities best chance at future survival.
@9RBNFB79mos9MO
Human genomic editing should only be done for genetic diseases or to correct epigenetic markers affecting the health of the individual, not affecting gametes
@9R4Q69P9mos9MO
genetic modifications as in what? to save someone life? Or only because they want it?
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.