Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

If the internet is slow then since what is most popular is what most people are trying to get to, then I think it’s fair to speed up a more used website at the expense of another

It would be good if the internet was faster for providers who pay more money, but not to slow down the internet for those who don't pay.

It's really unfair if the bigger sites have a faster connection. There's too many monopolies online. The little guy shouldn't be at the disadvantage. A website should not be allowed to pay for optimal speed. Every site should have equal speed.

Capitalism sucks

Private companies are free to do as they please

Internet should be open and not controlled by only two overseers (bell and rogers)

Regardless, not a governmental concern.

No, this would be annoying

We should crush these capitolist pigs with an iron fist!

No Internet speed should be fast no matter what

yes but this must be divulged so consumers can choose between this type of provider and a unbiased type provider

No, the internet should be controlled by the state and should be free and accessible to everyone

No, this isn't fair market compétition and providers should be sanctioned for this practice

This is not how net neutrality works

Internet in general should be faster and cheaper.

I dont really care about this.

Depending on content websites should be sped up or slowed down.

No and this is a debunked theory.

It’s their decision, not the government’s

Yes and socialize this service and make internet free for all.

Create laws against the throttling and or limiting of data.

Yes, we should make internet free of charge and socialize access.

No. Why should the internet provider decide what is most important for each individual paying customer?

Slow down X-rated sites

I think if they both have the fastest speed to open up the websites it will be better.

Keep it as is.

Yes, I don't agree with this practice but the government should not regulate businesses.

Slow down access to dangerous websites, but otherwise treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

No, leave it as is

No, the internet should be free for all

I don't really care for this so can't have an opinion on it.

Yes, but only if the infrastructure is opened up for all companies to use.

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. ISPs need to treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet.

No, and we shouldn't have private internet service providers. This industry should be syndicated and available for free for everyone.

Yes, but we should support the openess and freedom of the internet, as well as support companies like Stacks, who give the user power over their own data.

No, and the internet should be decentralized.

Yes, but ISPs that do this should be boycotted.

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

I don't a stance on this issue.

The internet should be open and free, but private companies have the right to speed up access to websites that pay more for advertising.

NO, DO PEOPLE DO THIS? that is so freaking stupid. THAT'S WHY M MOBILE DATA SUCKS!!!

No, and nationalize ISPs.

No, the government should not be involved in internet traffic.

If the ISP charges fixed rates for fixed levels of service, that would be acceptable. If the ISP actually degrades the service of one user to increase that of another, that is unacceptable.

The government shouldn’t be involved.

indifferent on this issue

Their choice also it's the people's choice to business with them

No, quality of service should be determined by the internet plan of the destination address, not the source.