@9RZPX67

9>9  Personal answerpro choice, its the families decision whether a baby is right at the time or not

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded

9>9  Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerno forced speech in canada

9>9  Personal answerwho is getting rich in canada right now?

9>9  Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

9>9  Personal answeryes, given that the rent control policies do not crowd out, or affect landlords that are providing a solution to the housing market situation

9>9  Personal answerthe best universities with the highest scrutiny to be accredited should be allowed to charge the top tuition rates.

9>9  Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, most minimum wage jobs are meant to develop experience, not support a family

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

9>9  Personal answerthey need to know how to speak english, conserve the outdoors as a sportsmans environment, and be progressively minded on things like drug and alcohol prohibition policy, also understanding the difference of their civil rights in canada vs their home country

9>9  Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance

9>9  Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

9>9  Personal answeryes, only for families that earn under 50k a year

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes

9>9  Personal answerdecrease regulations at the rate theyre currently going. Its illegal to sell plastic straws but the government burns jet fuel at an astronomical rate for people who preach environmental conservation.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answermore, let people pay for their emergencies and deal with gross government backlog on healthcare to citizens

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerProvincial

9>9  Personal answerit should provide every incentive possible to natural citizens, not foreigners who use loopholes for owning property in canada

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answeryes, we must ally with big fish like the USA, before more foreign interference from BRICS can come unabridged into our country

9>9  Personal answerthe government should fully forgive any student loans issued before the COVID pandemic, especially to anyone who pursued a medical field

9>9  Personal answerNo, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerenergy is generally the concern of provinces, so no. the federal government is overreaching with their current policy and should only be stepping in due to the event of catastrophic failures/shortages. provincial governments need to do better and should be the ones incentivizing energy companies.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but encourage stay-at-home parenting

9>9  Personal answergiven that we are currently charging people who gained citizenship for plotting an attack with supposed ties to ISIS, yes there should be stricter screening.

9>9  Personal answerNo, they should be integrated into our society as citizens

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerany electoral contestant over 75 should be required to pass a mental competency request

9>9  Personal answerNo, sentence them to life in prison without parole instead

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, as long as all donations are public knowledge

9>9  Personal answeronly if landowners in this deal are given above 50% market value for expropriation.

9>9  Personal answera poor welfare recipient shouldnt be scanned for legalized/decriminalized drugs, government employees including parliamentarians should be tested and given the death penalty if voting for drug policy

9>9  Personal answeronly for the healthcare sector and those that dont forge their credentials

9>9  Personal answerno, covid requirements were the greatest breach of our charter rights and stances, any covid mandates should be heavily criminalized

9>9  Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead

9>9  Personal answerit should invest 10 billion into the maintencance budget of great lakes/large bodies of water

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but not in heavily populated areas

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and make it a criminal offense

9>9  Personal answertransportation services should be left to the provincial/municipal sector

9>9  Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answeryes, release all non violent offenders and abolish tax on all marijuana

9>9  Personal answeryes, only for cases where the defendant can prove with indisputable evidence that they were wrongfully convicted or have been significantly rehabilitated

9>9  Personal answergiven that public most public unions in canada are against having to actually work 3 days a week under minimal accommodations, public unions are bad!

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answercanada should deal with financing its own military before engaging some russo-european conflict

9>9  Personal answerour B grade military has more important things to worry about than some 3rd world middle eastern conflict

9>9  Personal answerno this is a major invasion of privacy, any government that introduces this should be voted into the ground

9>9  Personal answerNo, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, these types of donations just turn into bribes

9>9  Personal answeras long as it goes to support the 60% of canadian who actually create the jobs, not govt consulting contracts

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNO. police work is police work, social work is social work

9>9  Personal answerNo, come up with local solutions that work for each community

9>9  Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

9>9  Personal answerNo, it should be raised

9>9  Personal answerhamas militants attacked israeli civilians, hamas militants deserve no quarter in my book

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerto a certain point, taxpayer funded anything should be accessible to those who actually pay taxes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerto a certain point, AI is new and needs to be corroborated between public, private, and government resources beforehand

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, reduce the number of government officials instead

9>9  Personal answernot when they advocate 3 day work weeks while services are on the continual decline

9>9  Personal answerif people payed 40-50+ years of taxes, they deserve to be taken care of very comfortably in their old age

9>9  Personal answerDecrease

9>9  Personal answerPrivatize

9>9  Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 20%

9>9  Personal answerno, especially what happened during the freedom convoy in 2022

9>9  Personal answerinvest in farmers who reuse the food watste. There is a pig farmer in the USA who recycles garbage to feed his pigs for record revenues. Our government should consider similar ideas.

9>9  Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit

9>9  Personal answerno, that is nothing but neo eugenics, a neo nazi school of thought, which our government and forefathers disagree with/ died protecting against

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, there is too much corruption in Ukraine

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

9>9  Personal answerdepends on the credentials. what pays better, a consultancy in a mid level bureaucracy in Ottawa or some entry level paying oil rig job in Alberta

9>9  Personal answeras long as the partnerships are between local and provincial governments and not federal

9>9  Personal answeryes as long as from the USA or the UK

9>9  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

9>9  Personal answerfor most things, depending on the crime.

9>9  Personal answerincrease drastically, our military is a joke, we need a warrior culture not a trans woke culture

9>9  Personal answeras long as the USA can provide defense, and mexico can produce goods

9>9  Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead

9>9  Personal answerNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

9>9  Personal answeryes, but only if theyre a natural born canadian citizen pre 1950 to 2005

9>9  Personal answerNo, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

9>9  Personal answeryes, but if youre simply changing your music there should be no charge

9>9  Personal answerNo, they should be reduced

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, batteries are just as harmful to the environment

9>9  Personal answerno, since theyve turned comments off and discouraged public discourse, they deserve to be defunded

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerAbolish, the recent corruption scandals have proven that any unelected body of government is detrimental towards democracy

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet

9>9  Personal answergiven calgary's current water problems, yes. our tax dollars should go towards maintenance rather than new projects that siphon funding

9>9  Personal answerNo, income splitting is unfair to low income families

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answeronly if to help their individual retirement. abolish gimmick tax scams in canada and allow people to make actual money

9>9  Personal answergiven our current incidences of foreign interference, yes all MPs and MLAs should submit to an ID system that weeds out fraud and foreign interference

9>9  Personal answerNo, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation

9>9  Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerno, bike lanes are dangerous and counter progressive for cities

9>9  Personal answeronly if they have approval from provincial authorities and it reflects on their current policy needs/issues

9>9  Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools

9>9  Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

9>9  Personal answercurrently, safe vehicles have so many safety features that they could no longer be considered safe.

9>9  Personal answerno, purchasing a conventional vehicle as opposed to an electric vehicle both have similar environmental implications if not more, government should not force private citizens to pay for such tax scams/ Buying an EV is a choice, not something that should be subsidized with taxpayer dollars.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerno, cities should do better to meet growing infrastructure requirements than taxing current citizens for the growing needs.

9>9  Personal answernot this current government. Any regular government yes but the current government absolutely not.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answersupport how? financial support? arms and defense support? political and media support? unless we can actually do something for this conflict canada is a B grade player only involved in things like immigration from said countries not actual defense policy. If we were able to get our federal energy policy in order, with minds to constitutional overreaching, maybe we could actually help more with this issue.

9>9  Personal answeronly people who are canadian born and under 150k. honest working class income

9>9  Personal answerNo, privacy is more important than statistics

9>9  Personal answerCitizens should be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can NOT monitor.

9>9  Personal answerno that is an abuse of proprietary process/resources, but the extreme legal limit should be allowed and dis/misinformation be outlawed against it

9>9  Personal answerif youre going to allow immigration at the levels youve introduced, let them send money where they need to

9>9  Personal answergovernment intervention doesnt need to/shouldnt happen with uber, therefore they dont need my tax contribution

9>9  Personal answerthere should not be teslas used by local police forces, if local services cannot meet local demand for food banks

9>9  Personal answerNo, and underprivileged citizens deserve the same financial opportunities and services that traditional banks offer the wealthy

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, and decrease funding

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerno it is up to private vehicle companies and the market to decide what to buy. take the tesla cybertruck, the market is currently deciding if the truck is worth the durability or not worth the cost due to aesthetics.