@9LJGNWT

A>A  Personal answerI am pro-life in general but understand that incest is a horrible situation for both the female and the fetus as it may lead to congenital defects. I also think rape is horrible and rapists should be killed by the victim or sent up for life but the fetus is innocent. It's a decision that the woman must make and eventually answer to God.

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerI'm in general disagreement with promoting gay family child rearing. I think children need both a mother and father. Sadly, many fathers are absent and many mothers choose bad mates. Is an adopted or IVF child better off in a calm, loving gay household than an abusive, violent hetero household? Most likely, yes. But I would hope the gay household tries to get an adult of the opposite gender involved in the child's life. Some gay households, especially lesbian households have a real hatred of men and they should NOT have children until they address their baggage.

A>A  Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

A>A  Personal answerNo, get private health care coverage, if you want. No coverage, no treatment unless charity of some sort voluntarily steps in. Private coverage options should become competitive but will also underwrite each applicant and possibly deny coverage in some circumstances. In that case, a public form may be needed but paid for by the insured.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, and it should be at least two years of service

A>A  Personal answerAbolish the income tax and start imposing tariffs. Cut federal and provincial government to 10% of its size. Abolish the federal and provincial MP and MLA and Senate pensions immediately.

A>A  Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and eliminate all wage standards

A>A  Personal answerYes, at their expense, or learn the language before they come.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerTricky, large multinationals already move income to low or zero taxation locations and simply break even or operate at a loss in the local country. Tax their GROSS REVENUE and ELIMINATE their ability to fund politicians. Political representatives should only be supported by human beings, not fictitious legal constructs.

A>A  Personal answerMore

A>A  Personal answerYes, through selective logging and forest regeneration AND secondary and tertiary manufacturing within Canada. Sending ANY logs overseas or out of country for processing elsewhere is bad... but so are the closed shop union businesses that cannot be profitable compared to non-unionized production elsewhere.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYES, very strict screening on criminal background, must assimilate (but we already have a Balkanized state that has serious problems). Remove those who engage in criminal activity and ban for life. Look for skilled workers or those who can become skilled workers. There may need to be an IQ test administered because we live in a world of increasing complexity and sadly there are those who cannot even enter the US military for lack of cognitive ability.

A>A  Personal answerYes, but meted out by the victim's family and only in air-tight, brutal, sadistic and truly malevolent cases. Any cased determined only by circumstantial evidence or DNA, no way. Too much room for bad trial procedure, faulty or corrupt laboratory work. It would seem that a second hearing would be needed to make sure that conviction met a VERY stringent criteria.

A>A  Personal answerRegardless, healthcare should be privatized

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and the current government is over-regulating businesses

A>A  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

A>A  Personal answerUnequivocally NO. Pay your damn debts like everyone else. Major in something productive that will afford you a career or job that will allow you to finance your life and pay off what you thought was worth borrowing for.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, but full disclosure of the conviction must be made repeatedly and publicly.

A>A  Personal answerNO! The government should not favor any industry over another or any sector of a particular industry over another. Let free markets dictate what form or forms of transportation anyone uses. The carbon tax must be eliminated immediately. Vehicles and heavy equipment already have substantial pollution controls.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerTwo strikes... long prison term with chance for parole. Three strikes.... life

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerIncrease

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, up to $5000 and only from humans. No foundations, corporations, charities or other legal entities.

A>A  Personal answerYes, if the landowners are fairly compensated

A>A  Personal answerRegardless, we should end all social welfare programs

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo, instead pursue those directly responsible for damage to lakes and rivers

A>A  Personal answerNo, use corrupt politicians instead.

A>A  Personal answerNo. Implement a series of run-off elections after those candidates receiving less than a certain amount of votes are eliminated. A candidate wins ONLY after securing 50.1% of the vote.

A>A  Personal answerNo to any requirements for vaccination.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, ONLY if all chemicals used in the process can be recovered, stripped out of wastewater and the water used put back to potable conditions. If not, then this again is a market force that will either promote conservation, recovery, alternative fuel sources, methods or importation of fuels from elsewhere.

A>A  Personal answerYes, I hate the stuff as recreational but I think that edibles and oils are extremely beneficial from a medicinal perspective. Make growers scrub their exhaust air. I hate the smell.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo to any involvement. Let Israel stand on its own two feet and atone for how it has treated Palestinians since 1948. The country should never have been formed in the first place. Let them make their own way with Iran, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and other Arab states. Then, let's see how the bully makes out in the playground.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, as long as the corporations building the pipeline and operating the pipeline have UNLIMITED LIABILITY and either sufficient assets or bonding in place to clean up an environmental disaster. If the cost of the potential loss or bonding is prohibitive, then this is a market force that will drive stakeholders to alternatives.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerMostly hurt, especially government/public unions. Allow a company to operate with unions AND non-union workers. There have been and are benefits to unions but they also prevent meritocracy from determining financial reward, promotion and productivity.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, and limited to two terms

A>A  Personal answerNo, and the UN should be abolished

A>A  Personal answerYes, as long as they take their share of debt

A>A  Personal answerMore, and deny benefits to immigrants

A>A  Personal answerNeither, replace it with a work VISA program

A>A  Personal answerIsrael is an illegitimate, rogue occupier of what used to be Palestine. But so was the British Empire upon the breakup of the Ottoman Empire. I would like to see a two state solution based on the 1947 boundaries and stop funding either of them. Let all the different ideologies figure it out with either peaceful discussion, or sticks and rocks. Israel has MUCH to atone for.

A>A  Personal answerNo, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNO and no to supporting ANY foreign government. That's their problem. Keep our governing bodies as small as possible and for the SOLE benefit of Canada and Canadian's welfare.

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerAllow a worker or pensioner to either remain in or opt out of both CPP and OAS. Upon opting out, that person gets a commuted value of all past contributions into CPP (both employee and employer portions. If opting out of OAS, which can only happen at age 65 or later, then pay a discounted amount immediately that the person can invest. The discounted amount will depend on age at the time of opting out of either plan. If opting out of CPP before age 65, then reduce taxation on the individual by 5% if the income tax has not already been abolished.

A>A  Personal answerYes, drastic cuts or complete elimination to all areas of government that are not involved with national and border defense. Eliminate the RCMP and allow provinces to construct provincial police and local police with elected sheriffs or police chiefs.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerPrivatize

A>A  Personal answerI don't support it but (1) all GMO and irradiated foods should be labeled as such and (2) patented seeds only retain protection on the farm that uses them. If the wind blows pollen from a GMO crop to an adjacent site and causes that crop to become hybridized, that crop belongs to the farmer of the contaminated field. In addition, any seed from that crop belongs to the farmer. However, the farmer whose crop is cross pollinated now needs to sell his product as being a GMO product. That farmer may also be entitled to sue the other farmer for damages.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes, and all trust, foundation and corporate tax records for 5 years prior to election and every year that they hold office.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerI take it that a frozen embryo is unfertilized so NO

A>A  Personal answerEliminate!

A>A  Personal answerNo, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

A>A  Personal answerYes, without public subsidy but there should be no public subsidy into ANY industry. Let market forces drive research and innovation. There is much to be done with low yield, low half life reactors. It is possible to have a unit the size of a semi-trailer that powers an entire town. Safe operation should also address safe disposal of spent fuels until fusion energy becomes the preferred choice.

A>A  Personal answerNo, first offence should result in a mandatory rehabilitation program, further offences result in jailtime

A>A  Personal answerProvincial

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and abolish NATO

A>A  Personal answerYes, as long as citizens of both countries are allowed to travel and work without question. If people are disallowed from freely travelling to and working in the other country then tariffs should be imposed on imported goods from the country that prevents unfettered travel and work. As long as the traveler has no criminal record and would be free to enter the other country as a tourist, they should be able to work there.

A>A  Personal answerYes, as long as their country of departure is a favorable one for reciprocal trade. If they are coming from a place of horrible persecution or social control (China) they must renounce ties with that oppressive place.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo, prohibit the WHO from entering into Canada and work for their complete eradication.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

A>A  Personal answerNo, but allow unlimited regional banks to form and get rid of CDIC and CMHC. Bank depositors must realize that banks borrow their deposits and often make risky investments. Get rid of all methods of protecting these "sacred cows." Their protection is one of the reasons that Canada is plagued with supply side management marketing boards and why MILLIONS of gallons of milk are dumped every year.

A>A  Personal answerIf the personal income tax is abolished (like Czech Republic) then this is a moot point.

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and eliminate funding

A>A  Personal answerEntirely depends on the "non-violent" crime committed. Sexual predation without violence... stay in prison. Property crime (theft, burglary, vandalism).. stay in prison

A>A  Personal answerNo, not all, just focus on infrastructure that is easy and cost-effective to replace

A>A  Personal answerSocial media companies must be deemed a utility and eliminate ALL censorship.

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerAbolish the Senate as it presently exists and eliminate ALL pensions to senators. The senate should be a regionally elected body similar to the US in that all provinces and territories get two senators, regardless of population. In addition, those running for election must get 50.1% of the entire vote in order to be elected. Multiple parties and candidates may necessitate run off elections whereby candidate receiving less than a threshold number of votes; say 15%, 20 or 25% are eliminated from the next round. Same goes for electing the rats that are presently seated. They must achieve 50.1% or more in the first or a subsequent run-off election to win the seat. The crime sinister must be an independent part of the government, much like the US president. He or she can create or veto legislation and is held in check by the lower house (MPs) and upper house (senate). No more appointments and get rid of EVERY senator NOW and rebuild.

A>A  Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerYes but entirely financed by the enrollees' families. NO provincial or federal subsidy.

A>A  Personal answerThat is up to each municipality to ensure that public officials enter into meaningful and productive contracts that attempt to benefit that community. Any official that willfully misleads the public and/or receives payoffs for promoting or agreeing to such an arrangement should be prosecuted and if convicted, EXECUTED. Did you hear that Trudildeau?

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

A>A  Personal answerNo

A>A  Personal answerNo, and there should be NO income tax on personal income or personal investment income.

A>A  Personal answerNo, and decrease funding

A>A  Personal answerYes... but could be a complete nightmare regarding traffic controlling. Absolutely no flying over private property unless the owner has requested it presence. Absolutely NO side scanning or spying on adjacent property.

A>A  Personal answerYes but impose severe tariffs on goods coming in and excise tax on goods going to them. They are ruled by a corrupt, installed government. I feel badly for the population.