@85QWNPG

y>y  Personal answerNo, the government should recommend it but not require it

y>y  Personal answerPro-Choice within the first 5 weeks, this is a hard time period to notice the change, but its within the end of this period that both the brain and nervous system have developed, and at that point it is able to feel pain.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, and more specifically rise the amount spent on research in Psychadelic treatments as they are less harmful when compared to traditional western medication that damage the neurons, body or nervous system.

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, for workplace hiring and fairness, but there is no way to know whether or not you have offended the persons personal identification, and as well it can be abused by bad actors, would be far better to implement gender neutral bathrooms and put protections in place for Trans discrimination, where there is a noticeable change to the person rather than an ideological position such as “I’m XYZ”, in laments terms, something measurable and fairly consistent (Usually) with their appearance.

y>y  Personal answerReform to a flat tax, replace the numerous taxes we have with a cleaner system of income and VAT or similar rather than state independent tax systems which can be confusing.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

y>y  Personal answerYes, we should implement it as another Juror control until the hallucinations are resolved.

y>y  Personal answerYes, but only for large international corporations

y>y  Personal answerNo, abolish the minimum wage. Wage standards have done a poor job of maintaining support for housing/monthly charges, and is in constant need of adjustment, this is not a long term system and should be replaced with a more adequate UBI

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, it is absurd to expect them to know all of our history when many American citizens do not, instead focus on skills that could be provided to various sectors via mental acuity tests in their native language. The most important thing is merely the background checks, nothing more is truly relevant to their longterm success here.

y>y  Personal answerYes, fix the gun show loophole, buffer background checks for criminal records, psychological examination, weapon safety training and full registration with the government of each gun's possession as well a limiting of all militaristic weaponry focused on far ranged attack, such as semi assault weapons.

y>y  Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes

y>y  Personal answerNo, but it should be highly streamlined, encouraged and free for them to learn English on the process of attaining citizenship or in the years after if their mind changes.

y>y  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes only if hormone levels, muscle mass and bone density are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete

y>y  Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions

y>y  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

y>y  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerNo, but they should also streamline the current laws to reflect actual driver habits such as removing the current system of speed limits and implementing roads which inherently change the speed of drivers like in the Netherlands, remove sliplanes, right on red and similar dangerous habits as well change red lights to mandatory roundabouts through a system of slow renewal that eventually removes much of the road infrastructure in place of public alternatives.

y>y  Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

y>y  Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

y>y  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

y>y  Personal answerYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

y>y  Personal answerYes, but only for international travel

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerIncrease, our population is set to decline in the coming decades and the only true way to stop this in a first world nation (of which we are barely), is to bring in high skilled foreign labor so that they may set up a family here and keep the economic flow moving. Currently countries such as Japan and Korea which sought to keep out much foreign influence on the economy are feeling the strain of putting that burden on an aging population.

y>y  Personal answerNo, abolish welfare and provide free and universal healthcare regardless of drug usage or criminal history.

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes, on the tops of buildings, but restrictive land spacing for lawns and similar has been a US based issue that limits development. Japan doesn't need this to thrive, nor Singapore. Solve the problem, don't create new ones.

y>y  Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material

y>y  Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

y>y  Personal answerYes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations.

y>y  Personal answerYes, because it is our own fault dense public housing is banned in many states/cities and that public healthcare isn't already in place with our stupid amount of spending on the trashy infrastructure that doesn't cover their needs. Hiding the homeless doesn't fix the problem, it just shows your true egotism and lack of empathy.

y>y  Personal answerYes, immediate release for anyone serving time for non-violent drug offences is also necessary, and the further decriminalization in posession of other natural substances is of utmost importance to lowering the extreme rate of imprisonment in many poor regions, and allowing more personal freedoms to those who wish to experiment with drugs that are far safer than both medications often prescribed and alcohol/cigarettes, which are widely available.

y>y  Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerHelp

y>y  Personal answerYes, and imminent domain unused spaces that could be repurposed for homeless rehabilitation, as well drug rehab facilities need to be commonplace considering the spread of our nations issue with drug usage.

y>y  Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

y>y  Personal answerNo, this is a privacy nightmare.

y>y  Personal answerNo, gaza isn't our problem. The UN can set up that border.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, and political campaigns should be publicly funded

y>y  Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech

y>y  Personal answerYes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure

y>y  Personal answerNo, only for teachers or faculty members that commit acts of prejudice

y>y  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

y>y  Personal answerNo, the problem of US police force is not the amount of investment but rather the unfair encentives for stops, searches and jailings, private prisons and lack of training of which can all be fixed by both more oversight, accountability and a balance of the spending in current budgetary finances.

y>y  Personal answerAbolish welfare, un-ban high density public housing construction and provide both universal healthcare and a small UBI to all citizens as a dividend of investment on their providing to our prosperity

y>y  Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

y>y  Personal answerPalestine, the land should be restored to the 60s accord or further, Israel has gotten quite comfortable taking land that was only recently bestowed to them from the Nazis onward. Haavara Agreement

y>y  Personal answerYes, restrictions, but not an outright ban. We must weigh the balance of sending aid in times of war with the consequential outlook of America as the arms dealer. The people seeing our name on the weapons used against them may go to blame us more than the perpetuator of war, because the fodder of continued unrest was our creation.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, focus on ending tax evasion instead

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, and drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties

y>y  Personal answerNo, they should only seek to de-incentivize it, the free market determines if people want it but they can limit abundance of processed food to areas of high risk weight for example and require digital identification on proof of purchase for alcohol/tobacco/marijuana and similar.

y>y  Personal answerYes, it should be illegal to throw away food outright before allowing charities to go through and outsource it to the homeless and those in need of assistance.

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerDecrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, there is too much corruption in Ukraine

y>y  Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech

y>y  Personal answerYes, and sooner than 2040. Better alternatives would be hydrogen and we have other issues such as getting the electric infrastructure off of fossil fuels and onto Nuclear.

y>y  Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation

y>y  Personal answerYes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

y>y  Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

y>y  Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead

y>y  Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

y>y  Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

y>y  Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, distracted driving provable by video evidence from traffic stops or evidence such as texting/calling/apps used during the time of the incident should result in years of jail time depending on if lives were lost and the jeopardy of those involved losing their mobility or life.

y>y  Personal answerNo, all retirement payments should be based on your own investment into the economy and as well be in tandem with a proper UBI, therefor making a raise on Government workers an unfair advantage over their constituents which may have worked just as hard, for just as long, government does not mean military.

y>y  Personal answerNo, not for consumption, until we understand the multiplicities involved in tumor production from its usage.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, if the project outlook is less than 10 years with no leniency toward delay and the power of imminent domain to build them efficiently as possible.

y>y  Personal answerYes, and eventually all countries will switch to blockchain currencies with randomized encryption, but until they’re protected against a CME from our sun, it is not a viable alternative.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, our country has been on the losing side of trade deals for too long

y>y  Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, sanctuary cities should be funded by state government.

y>y  Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives

y>y  Personal answerYes, with a requirement on sale of the vehicle for 5 years of ownership to return the rebate to the government, OR the trade-in of an equally valued gas-powered vehicle during purchase.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes, regulate, but remove the ban. CRISPR has a 30% off-site effect, quite a high risk but to 70% reward for those in need. We should also LIFT all bans on STEM CELL research and look forward to direct base editing with only an 18% off-site effect.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, and abolish the CIA, we have the NSA.

y>y  Personal answerYes, invest, but not integrate until the problem of hallucination is solved.

y>y  Personal answerNo, this one is a social issue.

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, we have medicaid rides and buses.

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerYes

y>y  Personal answerNo, this adds more antiquated infrastructure that needs maintenance and creates an onus to build more roads when we should be reducing their spread.

y>y  Personal answerNo, this is a free market issue.

y>y  Personal answerYes, in so much as a guideline to keep them consistent.

y>y  Personal answerYes