Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
D>D Personal answerPro-life |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
D>D Personal answerYes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed |
Healthcare › Mental Health
D>D Personal answerYes |
Housing › Foreign Real Estate Investment
D>D Personal answerYes |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
D>D Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Housing › Affordable Housing
D>D Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Transition
D>D Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
Social › Gay Marriage
D>D Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage |
Social › Gender Identity
D>D Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
D>D Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
the Economy › Taxes
D>D Personal answerTax all classes appropriatly and accordingly based on case by case scenarios |
Social › Hate Speech
D>D Personal answerYes but, this is a slippery slope in terms of constitutional protection. The first amendment does not specify what type of speech is protected. Additionally, supressing any more speech unprotected opens the door for more censorship. However, any type of speech that promotes or insights violence, which certain hate speech can, should be enforced against. |
Housing › Rent Control
D>D Personal answerNo, implementing such a policy would create a handicap for landlords to upgrade, improve, and maintain their facilities |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
D>D Personal answerNo, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses |
Crime › Criminal Justice Use of AI
D>D Personal answerNo! AI is already being used too much in the country |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
D>D Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Social › Euthanasia
D>D Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
D>D Personal answerNo, only if they have entered the country illegally |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
D>D Personal answerNo, this system is too expensive |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
D>D Personal answerNo, most minimum wage jobs are meant to develop experience, not support a family |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
D>D Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
D>D Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
D>D Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
D>D Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Healthcare › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
D>D Personal answerYes, as all private businesses should have the right to do so in the case of a public health concern. |
Social › Transgender Athletes
D>D Personal answerNo |
Social › Death Penalty
D>D Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
D>D Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Social › Niqāb
D>D Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
D>D Personal answerYes, fake news on social media has grown to an unacceptable level and introducing regulatory action to prevent it would show that the government does not tolerate fake news stories that deceive the American public |
Crime › Private Prisons
D>D Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
Foreign Policy › Taliban Financial Aid
D>D Personal answerNo |
Housing › First-time Homebuyer Subsidies
D>D Personal answerYes they should, however there should be a sctrict guidelins to who gets subsidized so to avoid the creation of another housing bubble. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
D>D Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
D>D Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Social › Women in Combat
D>D Personal answerYes |
Technology › Data Privacy
D>D Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
D>D Personal answerYes |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
D>D Personal answerYes |
Elections › Mental competency testing
D>D Personal answerNo, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
D>D Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
D>D Personal answerYes, as long as they are given a fair trial |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
D>D Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
D>D Personal answerIncrease and decrease based in the current economic state |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
D>D Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
D>D Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
D>D Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
D>D Personal answerNo, they should abide by the "one country,two systems" deal |
the Economy › Four-day Workweek
D>D Personal answerNo, but instead improve paid-vacation and paternal leave policies |
the Environment › Animal Testing
D>D Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Healthcare › COVID Employment Health Pass
D>D Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
the Environment › Fracking
D>D Personal answerYes, but not in heavily populated areas |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
D>D Personal answerYes, but if they are creating an enviornment that endangers public health or safety, they should be removed. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
D>D Personal answerYes, but only for medical use |
Foreign Policy › Gaza ceasefire
D>D Personal answerYes |
Housing › Green Spaces
D>D Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
D>D Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Foreign Policy › Ukrainian Defense Funding
D>D Personal answerYes, though this should be done in conjuction with Russia's level of hostility |
Elections › Campaign Finance
D>D Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
D>D Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens |
the Economy › Labor Unions
D>D Personal answerDepends on the situation, currently labor unions I beleive have gained too much power against employers, but in times of economic slowdowns/depressions, they should come to the defense of their members. |
Housing › Homeless Shelters
D>D Personal answerNo only because increasing the resources for homelessness may give the idea that its ok for individuals to accept homelessness |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
D>D Personal answerNo, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products |
the Economy › Welfare
D>D Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
Transportation › Transportation Accessibility for People with Disabilities
D>D Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
D>D Personal answerYes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
Foreign Policy › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
D>D Personal answerIsrael |
Crime › Defunding the Police
D>D Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
D>D Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine
D>D Personal answerYes, but inly to the point where it it endangers national security to the United States ir NATO |
Transportation › GPS Vehicle Tracking
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
D>D Personal answerNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
D>D Personal answerNo |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
D>D Personal answerYes |
Housing › High density residential buildings
D>D Personal answerYes, as this can allow for more real estate to other entrpenual chances ti imorive economic conditions |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
D>D Personal answerNo, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
D>D Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Electric Vehicle Mandates
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Food Waste
D>D Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
D>D Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
National Security › Facial Recognition
D>D Personal answerYes, as individuals who have no secrets to hide should not feel like they are being infringed upon. Instead this would benefit the fight against criminals and terrorists. |
Healthcare › Marketing Unhealthy Products to Youth
D>D Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
D>D Personal answerYes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
Science › Genetic Engineering
D>D Personal answerNo, because opening the door to disease prevention could lead to more sinister intentions. |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
D>D Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine and Nato
D>D Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war |
the Economy › NAFTA
D>D Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
D>D Personal answerYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Transportation › Public Transportation
D>D Personal answerYes |
Crime › Restorative Justice Programs
D>D Personal answerYes, but twe must be very selective with who is included. Willing participant criminals should be welcomed to the opportunity to restoration. Though disclude very violent or unwilling criminals. |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
D>D Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
D>D Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
D>D Personal answerYes, but decrease the amount |
Healthcare › Medical Consensus
D>D Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
D>D Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes |
Science › Lab Grown Meat
D>D Personal answerYes, but only to a limited point where no adverse health effects are discovered. |
the Economy › Government Pensions
D>D Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure
D>D Personal answerNo, investment in new infrastructure can also allow for a new priotitization on longevity |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
D>D Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
D>D Personal answerFacts only. Rhetoric needs to be analyzed. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
D>D Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › TikTok Ban
D>D Personal answerAt the moment no, but if the platform continually gets used to push agendas to furthur divide the American society, make it more polarized, and more towards another atate of Civil War, then it may need to be abolished in the U.S |
the Environment › Geoengineering
D>D Personal answerNo, as there is no evidence that this would actually combat climate change. It could potentially make it worse |
Transportation › Fuel Efficiency Requirements
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bitcoin
D>D Personal answerNo, and it has no intrinsic value |
National Security › National Identification System
D>D Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Tariffs
D>D Personal answerYes, but only to the extent necessary to maximize revenue. |
the Environment › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
D>D Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Smart Transportation Infrastructure
D>D Personal answerYes, but limit to how uch AI is used in such developments |
Transportation › High Speed Rail
D>D Personal answerNo |
Education › University Debt Accountability
D>D Personal answerNo, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education |
the Environment › Carbon Capture Subsidies
D>D Personal answerYes, this appears to be a tolerable and beneficial way to contain CO2 emissions |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
D>D Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
D>D Personal answerYes, it will bring economic growth to all countries involved |
Education › Charter Schools
D>D Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
Transportation › Advanced Automotive Technology
D>D Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Congestion Pricing
D>D Personal answerYes |
the Environment › EV Subsidies
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
D>D Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Diesel Emission Standards
D>D Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Bicycles and Bike Lanes
D>D Personal answerNo |
Science › CRISPR Technology
D>D Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Carpooling and Shared Transportation
D>D Personal answerYes |
National Security › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
D>D Personal answerNO! There is already too much investment in AI. I feel it is already infringing on job creation and security |
Housing › Foreclosure Assistance
D>D Personal answerYes, but only to a certain extent where it is not considered a "bail-out". As doing so would give the idea that individuals can become complacent when it comes to their financial responsibilities. |
National Security › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
D>D Personal answerNo, as the givernment must follow the rule of law |
Technology › Self Hosted Digital Wallets
D>D Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Decentralized Finance
D>D Personal answerNo, and I don’t understand the concept of decentralized finance |
Technology › Social Media Regulation
D>D Personal answerYes, as this is a way to prevent large tech companies from gaining unlawful collateral intelligence against our citizens |
Transportation › Ride-Sharing Subsidies
D>D Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Autonomous Vehicle Regulation
D>D Personal answerNo |
National Security › Cross-border Payments
D>D Personal answerYes |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
D>D Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.2k2.8k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.