Try the political quiz
+

1.8k Replies

 @9397NT2from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No direct military intervention, there should be a precedent for peace, but once the war is over, we should contribute to the redevelopment of Ukraine

 @938QWQZfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they should provide weapons and training to Ukrainian forces to defend their own country

 @9383HCGPeople’sfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

U.S. and NATO should give Ukraine as much modern weapon as possible, so Ukraine can fully dearest and destroy Russia.

 @936NX9Zfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @936KWVLfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

The Russian army has been an embarrassment. Ukraine pretty much has the situation in hand

 @936GP2VPeople’sfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

The ukrainian army doesn't really need our help. They've been crushing the Russian army just like the Finns did back in 1940

 @9368W6Dfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9368W6Dfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and Canada should withdraw from NATO and have their own independent foreign policy that opposes the US. We should be allies with Russia and China against American imperialism

 @932PQQFfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Not until it makes no difference in our security. If our security is already seriously threatened, then we may as well help

 @92W29CRNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

As of right now, Ukraine is doing fine against Russia, and NATO joining would only increase the threat of nuclear war

 @92TPFLJfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92RMKPKfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92PQBJWfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No. No country should be involved in other countries problems. Their conflict is between them. How has the world forgotten how badly the league of Nations failed. NATO is no different and the actions currently are bringing us closer the the mistakes of the past.

 @92PM7QJfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, arming Ukraine and supporting it through aid should be prioritized.

 @92PCC5Qfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92PC7KVfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92NSVSPfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if they invade a NATO member, such as Poland, Hungary, or Romania. Otherwise, they should keep doing what we're doing now, sending aid/weapons for Ukraine to defend itself.

 @92NRJM9from Quebec  answered…3yrs3Y

No, Russia has nuclear weapons and they may use them if another nuclear power declares war on them. Western meddling is also one of the many complex reasons why Russia invaded Ukraine.

 @92MWQCFfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92MTRHHfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92HB7CTfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92CTVPFfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Only when and if Ukraine joins NATO, at which point it will be subject to NATO's collective defense.

 @92B4S5Tfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, simply because that would trigger a world war, which would undeniably go horribly wrong due to nuclear warheads. We should instead supply Ukraine with the materials necessary to defend their sovereignty.

 @923VLB3from British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9235Q2Jfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZZSYGKfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @baloneymaloneyfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

The U.S. and NATO should support Ukraine to help them defend their own country, but not directly fight for them against Russia

 @8ZX5HSVLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZSM3NWfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZSLL2Jfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Military supplies and volunteer forces should be sent, but no conscription or officially joining the war.

 @8ZBH3YQfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Not the US because Putin is waiting for it to act so he can use his nuclear weapons, but NATO should

 @8Z4X3MKfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

I think military force should be a last resort but that other solutions should be discussed to defend Ukraine

 @8YXJYTNfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

If it affects U.S. and NATO than yes but their is no direct impact to either than i would say no.

 @8YX9G8Nfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92PSZX3New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but provide as much aid as possible without risking the start of a larger war

 @8YLB9QX from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @87ZK4XL from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

The U.S. and NATO should support Ukraine militarily but should not send troops to fight

 @Frugajn from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @646YDRS from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @6TD492H from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @6Y9S378 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7C2L5MQ from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

We can give aid to Ukraine but no American or NATO soldier should step food in Ukraine

 @7KD4Z5Q from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7BFV7YC from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

No, unless WMDs such as tactical nukes, chemical, or bioweapons are used

 @7BMP7N5 from Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7TWQJR5 from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @85QL69F from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @89Q2P3Z from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, we should provide them with weapons to defend themselves but not send our troops

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, our country should provide the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves but not send our troops

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, our troops should be on standby but their usage should only be in coordination with our NATO allies through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, our troops should be on standby but their usage should coordinated with our NATO allies' troops through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, since the Ukraine is a partner country to the NATO military alliance and will most likely become a future member

 @8GLTTPB from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they should provide humanitarian aid to the citizens of Ukraine

 @8RB2K9D from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8RQ55J4 from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8TKFNNS from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8VHBC3L from West Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VZ369N from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8W949N6 from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8XD6BY6 from Nevada  answered…3yrs3Y

No, instead we should use diplomatic means of dealing with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

 @8Y6XX9F from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9268RLG from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

No, I don't think we should. Because whats the point in doing it if were wasting money lives and troops on a small country that wouldn't help us

 @925VCRY from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92NVQ27 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92T52ZH from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

yes, to an extent we should but we should not use the fullest extent of our power

 @92T53D9 from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92PWWFR from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @936TVGY from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

 @923WWN6 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

The USA should support other nato countries in helping Ukraine because of the current state the countrey is in.

 @924593X from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YX6WD3 from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

no if we cant defend are own boarder then why should we help gard another country boarder