@8F57VCK

8>8  Personal answerPro-choice

8>8  Personal answerNo, hire professionally trained security guards instead

8>8  Personal answerYes, but money should be directed to the public healthcare system, peer support organizations and people living with mental illnesses and addictions, not to private companies, who are already welcome to compete for profit.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerMaybe yes and maybe no, Yes but only for court order, with criminal backgrounds, and to combat terrorism. But when it comes to personal phone calls and emails i go with no.

8>8  Personal answerYes for anyone under 23 and 65+, people with conditions that are life-long (i.e diabetes, high blood pressure, etc.), prescriptions for cancer patients, vaccines, and birth contraceptives. For everything else, and unless it is absolutely necessary, there should be a program where an individual can request for coverage. If not, there are private insurance companies.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerThere should be more tax brackets with proportional tax rates.

8>8  Personal answerNo, however some sort of mandatory 1-2 year service, as an apprenticeship to learning the skill of being in community. Soup kitchens, city clean up, serving tables, voting stations, working with seniors and young children...to give a view of something other than their own perspective, that their participation in their community is not what's in it for them. To turn neediness, into being needed.

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo, they shouldn't be 'required' but blind, fair hiring practices should be put into place to combat unconscious gender biases in the hiring process. In the ideal world there would be a fair gender balance (BoD's with all men, all women, 10/90,20/80,30/70,40/60,50/50 splits across all businesses. Basically a 'most qualified regardless of gender' without the implicit male bias that often comes with that answer.

8>8  Personal answerYes, recent tuition increases at universities across the country are too high and need to be capped

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for children

8>8  Personal answerYes, and the curriculum should be updated regularly

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they understand the decision and are capable of making a decision like this. Also if there is not a chance they could survive, or if they are suffering terribly.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, only if they have entered the country illegally

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, for all minors, elders (65+), pregnant women, new mothers, people with physical or mental issues, and involuntary unemployed willing to train and accept job offers and as a replacement for the current welfare system.

8>8  Personal answerImmigrants should be able to take an English or a French proficiency test. If passed, they are not required to take lessons on either language. However, if failed, then they will have to take lessons.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

8>8  Personal answerDo not privatize existing hospitals but allow private health facilities to be built and complement the over burdened national/provincial hospitals.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

8>8  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

8>8  Personal answerYes, but make the process easier for skilled workers

8>8  Personal answerYes, however, if proof of identification is absolutely necessary, a female staff member should use an area away from public eyes to verify an identity

8>8  Personal answerProvincial but health insurance should be national. Medical professionals should be able to work across the country.

8>8  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

8>8  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

8>8  Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerProvide different subsidies to different levels of income.

8>8  Personal answerI think renewable energy is important, but i don't think government subsidizations should be necessary, and it would be too expensive on the gov't

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, we do not need to give more money to the Aboriginals to pay off from what has happened in the past. Throwing money at the problem in no way helps them get out of the poor living situations some live in. What needs to be done is putting that money to something useful like, education, training, programs, and helping them rehabilitate and reform the reserves if they so wish. Programs and education should be agreed upon by the elders. Again, stop throwing money at the issue, it does not change anything! We should help in other possible ways though.

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, sexual, or drug related crime. Also, politicians should be disallowed from running while under investigation for any serious crime. Lastly, any person currently holding any political office should be suspended without pay during the course of any criminal investigation of a serious crime, and they should be expelled permanently from political office following a conviction of any serious crime.

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation

8>8  Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers

8>8  Personal answerIncrease

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerIt should be decided by the people of Hong Kong

8>8  Personal answerCanada should adopt a new election system however other options need to be explored to find out which will work best for Canada.

8>8  Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

8>8  Personal answerYes, but under strict ethical regulation

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year

8>8  Personal answerI support the legalization however, it should be researched and sold by professionals/doctors and not sold by the liqour companies. It has many medical benefits so should be used for but not limited to medical purposes. I support recreational use as well but it should not be looked at the same as alcohol or harsh drugs.

8>8  Personal answerNo, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it

8>8  Personal answerNo, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products

8>8  Personal answerNo, transportation services should be left to the private sector

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate

8>8  Personal answerNo, voters should decide how long they stay in office

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

8>8  Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only with nations that adhere to strict human rights policies

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerFewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

8>8  Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount

8>8  Personal answerYes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

8>8  Personal answerNo, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes

8>8  Personal answerYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low income families and single parents

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low income pensioners

8>8  Personal answerPrivatize, but increase environmental and regulatory oversight for price control

8>8  Personal answerThere should be much more research on potential environmental and human impacts, and other routes should be investigated to address the food security problem. At the very least, they should be properly labeled so that individuals may choose.

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should not interfere with the free market

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to

8>8  Personal answerHelp internationally, but help Canadians first.

8>8  Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

8>8  Personal answerNo, first offence should result in a mandatory rehabilitation program, further offences result in jailtime

8>8  Personal answerFederal

8>8  Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerkeep the same but pivot spending towards defence and peacekeeping and supporting non-corrupt governments

8>8  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

8>8  Personal answerYes, but decrease the amount

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

8>8  Personal answerYes, and lower the cap to 50%

8>8  Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low-income pensioners

8>8  Personal answerEstablish and fund an unbiased media with the highest reporting standards, and with strict penalties for not adhering to non partisan reporting and releasing false information.

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerDepending on the severity and occurrence of the non-violent crime. Individual must be deemed a non-violent, low risk criminal & undergo psychological assessment before being released. Once released, individual must continue therapy, weekly check-ins & community service.

8>8  Personal answerNo, but add more regulations, transparency and fact checking.

8>8  Personal answerElect, and require members to be non-partisan

8>8  Personal answerNo - income splitting for "families" ignores economically and socially interdependent relationships that aren't defined as families - such as siblings or cousins who live together, share income to pay expenses and live as families for five, ten or forty years. They don't get any benefit despite having stronger familial ties than married persons, half of whom will eventually divorce.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but with limits set for workers with above average seasonal salaries

8>8  Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes, this will help create and save more jobs

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses

8>8  Personal answerYes, the information is vital for economists, scientists, statisticians, and the government to accurately make important policy decisions

8>8  Personal answerYes, all rights for profit should be reserved for the creator. That being said, harmless internet fads and memes should no affect sales it should actually boost them giving it more popularity. Leave IP laws as they are.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerDrones should require licenses to ensure they are used responsibly. They are a potential safety threat and can easily be used for terrorism.