@9K6M454

9>9  Personal answerPro-choice

9>9  Personal answerlol no? Were in canada, not in the states.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only when its important.

9>9  Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples

9>9  Personal answerNot that i mostly know of.

9>9  Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded

9>9  Personal answernobody is gonna spend 500$ just to research sociology 💀, considering this case, this country isn't gonna to care because of it's dumb "by the book" plans of this failing minister, how redundant.

9>9  Personal answerWe have alot of better stuff to do right now than this and alot of people are getting help as it is, so may it as a necessity at least, sure.

9>9  Personal answerup the age to exactly 18 and call it a day, that's their decision to make, their choice their fault

9>9  Personal answerYes, they don't deserve anything.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerdebatable and tricky, as long as it's necessary and doesn't tear the nation.

9>9  Personal answerBecoming like russia is retarded, No, Defenitely by choice.

9>9  Personal answerdepends on the speech, but obviously no.

9>9  Personal answerOn the other hand, No, on the other hand, yes, we dont need another china coming by.

9>9  Personal answerGuns should be free to use, but private selling can become an issue, and background checks can really help on a person.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

9>9  Personal answerdepends on the person

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerImmediate high raise, corps dont deserve anything.

9>9  Personal answerOnly the language and history, maybe government on some amount.

9>9  Personal answerif it doesnt harm anything then sure.

9>9  Personal answeras long as they're harmless, sure, if they have something to pay up though, lower the prices for everyone else then.

9>9  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

9>9  Personal answerNo Privatization, More Free stuff and funding.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

9>9  Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

9>9  Personal answerIf it works and it perfectly fits in well? sure but not for an alot.

9>9  Personal answerYes, some of that money shouldn't belong to it as worthless spendings on terrorism, police forces, taxes and government agencies get in the way.

9>9  Personal answerThis is rat-tramping, No.

9>9  Personal answerDepends on the crime itself, not everything needs to be over reactionary like a mutt running a council.

9>9  Personal answerDepends but no

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the government should give them their land back

9>9  Personal answerDepends on the roles.

9>9  Personal answerIt should be mixed.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if it's come to time to think about it and do in full course of action.

9>9  Personal answerNo, but it's common knowledge that some drugs help if you're smart enough to use them right for recreational needs or by the package.

9>9  Personal answerGood idea until once you find out it's not as thought out as you think, so no on some cases.

9>9  Personal answerNo, completely remove every existance of trace and take off our money from the world banks from there, they only serve issues and troubles, also, take us down from NATO and china immediately.

9>9  Personal answerDepends on the drugs

9>9  Personal answerAs long as no aborginals are involved, were all good.

9>9  Personal answerNo, some people actually deserve to be around here if it's by genetical defaults, so meaning, i'd accept the fact some racial minorities were "born in canada" while there family was from asia or something.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, as long as all donations are public knowledge

9>9  Personal answeri dont think they deserve rights or anything in particular.

9>9  Personal answerIf none come in deadly it is all good then, it depends on where they're going as well.

9>9  Personal answerThis could get really unstable and corrupted quick as any other political system, only better used for parties themselves, not for the head of the state.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

9>9  Personal answerNo, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerThat's by their own desicion, not mine, this war has gone active since 1948.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerWe have alot of transport we can get by and we defenitely dont need to spend more on railway tickets when we already have that thinking years ago in question that was finished, So no.

9>9  Personal answerDepending on the crime, yeah.

9>9  Personal answerDepends, but i give in 3 years is all i ask.

9>9  Personal answerI Think a local militia service is more better than a police force, as long as it acts like authority itself but doesn't enforcei t on others so it isn't as braindead corrupt.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but in more covert and hidden areas.

9>9  Personal answerDecrease, most of them go back to the states never to be seen again.

9>9  Personal answerNo, these types of donations just turn into bribes

9>9  Personal answersome extreme cases are not really extreme so it is better to smartfully think about the situation and the scenario in question to even such as use them in the first place when it isn't really mentally bad just to convince, a more worser situation would be something like waco siege, but with more people, or national anarchists around and in forts.

9>9  Personal answerNo, things like this can and should be changed to something else.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, Ukraine should rely on their own resources to defend themselves

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerDepends, but yes.

9>9  Personal answerFewer, this system is really corrupt as it sems to me, and it needs to be fixed immediately.

9>9  Personal answerAs long there is a headsup things should end "good"

9>9  Personal answerIt is defenitely something to check on but the government can just get random bank loans out of it ass so it doesn't matter.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if its through good thinking and cause.

9>9  Personal answerNo, an adult should be more considerate about racism in schools for good lord sake.

9>9  Personal answerDo both and control the pricing.

9>9  Personal answerYes, especially for those with severe disabilities and low incomers.

9>9  Personal answerdepends on what's being funded, but not necessarily..

9>9  Personal answerShould both depend on members and the government mostly.

9>9  Personal answerNo, Everything should be on its own while it assists the low classes.

9>9  Personal answeryeah but give in more governmental attention.

9>9  Personal answeras if a year 7-8 student doesn't know about racism, hilarious.

9>9  Personal answerIf it's used the smart and righr way, sure.

9>9  Personal answerNo, we should stop caring about others, when we already know both sides are worse.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office

9>9  Personal answerDoesn't matter, Yes.

9>9  Personal answerNo, this will turn chaotic quick.

9>9  Personal answerNo, it’s just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should

9>9  Personal answerthere is a good portion of this money being sent to somewhere else for goods, but why need it for stuff that doesn't effect us? completely dumb.

9>9  Personal answerExactly why would they? Definitely not!

9>9  Personal answerpermanent work is the solution, if they don't like it, move or get another job.

9>9  Personal answerThat depends but the laws will tell the time of them.

9>9  Personal answernot by alot so we can stabilize the country.

9>9  Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

9>9  Personal answerThis is a totally retarded idea.

9>9  Personal answerOnly for the lower class people, rich people depend but some should be good as long as they're not over millionaries or billionaries and as such.

9>9  Personal answeri've seen it help us on its own, so sure, as long as it's worth something to know about.

9>9  Personal answerAs long as it helps and people care? Sure.

9>9  Personal answerDepends, but if it's just government propaganda? fatally yes.

9>9  Personal answerIf they're careful, considerate and smart, they can go for it.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and eliminate funding

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only for low-income pensioners

9>9  Personal answerThere is such thing as freedom of speech, there is none of it when your ideas are not favored by the standard, and that sucks, but it is mostly important to not wreck their reputation either way on a screen.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answeronly aides can build those whoever is dumb enough to get electric cars.

9>9  Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

9>9  Personal answerAs long as its not going too far, were all good and such else as more.

9>9  Personal answerYes, this should be considered a threat of all odds to indepedence, there should be support services for this incase imo.

9>9  Personal answerDepends on the person running it, but if it gets too horrific, then no.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but if only the people involved genetically care.

9>9  Personal answerif the next government ran in today and was less corrupted and vindicative about people, i'd say yes for every set of years and online.

9>9  Personal answerNo, and decrease funding

9>9  Personal answerwoooaaahhh spy devices, to me, depends on the product but sure.

9>9  Personal answerYes