Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice |
Healthcare › Mental Health
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
8>8 Personal answerNo, hire professionally trained security guards instead |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, and increase funding for research into the causes of mental illness |
Social › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › University Tuition
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
8>8 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
8>8 Personal answerYes, preventative dental care is an important aspect of long term health |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage |
Social › Euthanasia
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerYes, private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
8>8 Personal answerNot enough choices on here. This is one of the most complicated issues. It could help low income families and peoples get a step in the right direction, but it could also be abused like our current welfare system. There would have to be a lot of regulation and thing to make it a workable system. Please rework this question. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Education › International Students
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
8>8 Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
Social › Death Penalty
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
the Environment › Logging
8>8 Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits |
Social › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
Social › Niqāb
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerFederal |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › Student Loan Debt
8>8 Personal answerDepending on situation. But the government should allow for more programs to work off student debt |
Social › Women in Combat
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, aboriginals should be further compensated for their hardships and use of resources |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
8>8 Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Freshwater Research
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Electoral Reform
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
the Economy › Pension Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year |
Healthcare › Marijuana
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
8>8 Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation |
the Environment › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerYes, and exceed the guidelines and be the world leader in environmental standards |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
the Economy › Free Trade
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only with nations that adhere to strict human rights policies |
the Economy › Welfare
8>8 Personal answerMore |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase taxes on the wealthy instead |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
8>8 Personal answerNationalize |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income pensioners |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
8>8 Personal answerDecrease |
Elections › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families and single parents |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
8>8 Personal answerYes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 10% |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerFederal |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerI'm sure BC is different, but TransLink is Terrible. We need to completely rework our transport. There is so much money going in, but only paying for the people at the top. The tax money spent on it is more than wasted. The amount put in, we should have extended from Vancouver to mission years ago, it's just starting now. This is a complicated issue and should be considered for different questioning/ wording in the future. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerNo, it is a slippery slope towards a police state |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerDecrease |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
8>8 Personal answerYes, and lower the cap to 50% |
the Economy › Government Pensions
8>8 Personal answerNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Transportation › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Senate
8>8 Personal answerElect, and require members to be non-partisan |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
8>8 Personal answerRegardless, raise the maximum rate so high wage earners can contribute more |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
8>8 Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
8>8 Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide |
Domestic Policy › CSA Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Aluminum Quotas
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.