@8TWKYN5

8>8  Personal answerPro choice, I don't agree with it but the government has no right to ban it. Nor is it the responsibility of the tax payer to fund it.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples

8>8  Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

8>8  Personal answerYes, for low income and high threshold.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government

8>8  Personal answerNo, and implement a two tier public/private system

8>8  Personal answerNo, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care

8>8  Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerRegardless, privatize education and let the free market determine the tuition rates

8>8  Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses

8>8  Personal answerYes for children and low income individuals.

8>8  Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

8>8  Personal answerYes, and it should test more than just a basic level of understanding

8>8  Personal answerNo, 2 tier health care should be standard.

8>8  Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

8>8  Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes

8>8  Personal answerRegulations should be increased on pollution and enforced. Taxing carbon is ridiculous and should be abolished.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

8>8  Personal answerMore

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

8>8  Personal answerYes in their own category.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member

8>8  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

8>8  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

8>8  Personal answerYes, but make the process easier for skilled workers

8>8  Personal answerYes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

8>8  Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

8>8  Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

8>8  Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

8>8  Personal answerNo, nor should non-renewable energy be subsidized.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low income families

8>8  Personal answerNo, aboriginals should not receive any more funds until their accounting is reviewed by independent auditors

8>8  Personal answerNo, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

8>8  Personal answerLegalize drugs and destroy the drug trade.

8>8  Personal answerYes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo, but legalize drugs

8>8  Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

8>8  Personal answerYes, if the landowners are fairly compensated

8>8  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount

8>8  Personal answerYes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians

8>8  Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material

8>8  Personal answerNo, keep the current “first past the post” system

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes. For life saving applications only

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year

8>8  Personal answerYes, this is a well planned project that will provide significant social and economic benefits to the region

8>8  Personal answerYes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerHurt, I support some private unions but am strongly against public unions

8>8  Personal answerNo, and reinstate the death penalty for heinous premeditated crimes

8>8  Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

8>8  Personal answerYes, and limited to two terms

8>8  Personal answerYes in the form of tax breaks for citizens and drastically reduced spending on foreign aid.

8>8  Personal answerNo, these types of donations just turn into bribes

8>8  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

8>8  Personal answerNo, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead

8>8  Personal answerNo, but single family dwellings should not be available for purchase by corporations.

8>8  Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

8>8  Personal answerNo, free trade puts downward pressure on wages and undermines consumer and environmental protections

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as they take their share of debt

8>8  Personal answerMore, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

8>8  Personal answerNo, it should be raised

8>8  Personal answerYes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

8>8  Personal answerNo, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes

8>8  Personal answerDecrease, and only allow for industries with a shortage of Canadian workers

8>8  Personal answerPrivatize, but increase environmental and regulatory oversight for price control

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low income pensioners

8>8  Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members

8>8  Personal answerLet each province decide

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerNo, but drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office

8>8  Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 20%

8>8  Personal answerDecrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries

8>8  Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so

8>8  Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency

8>8  Personal answerNo, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

8>8  Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a crime

8>8  Personal answerNo, it is a slippery slope towards a police state

8>8  Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

8>8  Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported

8>8  Personal answerYes, and lower the cap to 20%

8>8  Personal answerNo, not until we decrease our national debt

8>8  Personal answerNo, and eliminate funding

8>8  Personal answerElect

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis

8>8  Personal answerNo, higher premiums would encourage businesses to hire fewer workers and negatively affect the economy

8>8  Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit

8>8  Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

8>8  Personal answerNo, I would prefer a mandatory short form with an optional long form census

8>8  Personal answerNo

8>8  Personal answerYes