Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Mental Health
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerReform to a flat tax |
Social › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
8>8 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Education › University Tuition
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
8>8 Personal answerYes, but it should only go to people who need it. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
8>8 Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerLess, and provide more government funding |
the Environment › Logging
8>8 Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits |
Social › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerYes, and regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens |
Social › Death Penalty
8>8 Personal answerNo, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
Healthcare › Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerProvincial |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Social › Niqāb
8>8 Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerNo, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Crime › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Social › Women in Combat
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
8>8 Personal answerI am not educated enough on this matter. Although I do think it is important to stay connected and have different countries work together. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo, instead of monetary funds, we should instead offer assistance in the form of education, training, and social programs |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Vaccine Passports
8>8 Personal answerYes, but everyone should still wear a mask |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerNo, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
8>8 Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers |
Elections › Campaign Finance
8>8 Personal answerNo, as long as all donations are public knowledge |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerYes, if the landowners agree |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, test anyone who receives this money (including employees and politicians) but offer resources to those who test positive. |
the Environment › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Elections › Electoral Reform
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for medical use with strict guidelines in place for prescriptions. That being said, it is concerning at how much easier it is for youth to (illegally) access it. Just within my own community there is suddenly an abundance of minors doing drugs because they are easier to access. I go to school with a bunch who (even though they say they don't, they do in fact) have drug addictions. And guess what they all started with? Vaping and marijuana. |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
8>8 Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
8>8 Personal answerNo, and the government should drastically reduce spending during recessions |
the Economy › Labor Unions
8>8 Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited |
the Economy › Free Trade
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerNo, come up with local solutions that work for each community |
the Economy › Welfare
8>8 Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
8>8 Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
8>8 Personal answerNationalize |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
8>8 Personal answerNo, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answerDecrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerProvincial |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
8>8 Personal answerYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
8>8 Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes |
the Economy › Government Pensions
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
8>8 Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Senate
8>8 Personal answerElect |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
8>8 Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan |
the Economy › Bitcoin
8>8 Personal answerYes, but it should not replace our national treasury-backed currency |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
8>8 Personal answer(This is a copy of someone else's stance that I fully agreed with. All credits to this go to @TOFUTOFU) I don't believe that pirating for an individual's personal use should have any serious legal consequences. However, claiming the work as one's own, profiting from the work of someone else, or the vast distribution of a work you don't have the rights to should have consequences. Artists/content owners should be allowed to place locks on their content at their discretion, while also having realistic expectations of what it means to release their work digitally. The best efforts should be made to support the work of artists and to prevent the theft/other people profiting from the use of the work and illegal redistribution of their work. |
Domestic Policy › CSA Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…1wk1W
▲ 1.2k2.7k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.