@9F5FC8S

m>m  Personal answerPro-choice

m>m  Personal answerIncrease both public funding and incentivize private companies to address the issue. After we drastically improve our public system then a reassessment can be done to determine an appropriate amount of funding going forward.

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerPrescriptions should be covered in almost all cases with the exclusion of cosmetic surgeries, however not including dental or orthodontic procedures that improve quality of bite.

m>m  Personal answerAspects of university education should be free to eliminate financial barrier and subsequent financial burden. Alleviated costs will increase accessibility, improve academic performance, produce stronger graduate outcomes and improve our society/economy. Associated costs with university education should fall on the student, for example textbooks, but these should be made available at a more cost-effective rate. We should be removing all funding for immigration initiatives/foreign aid and investing in our students.

m>m  Personal answerNo, the problem is implementation not funding

m>m  Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerI’m undecided on how I feel about this topic in a broad stroke and currently consider it less important amongst other more pressing issues.

m>m  Personal answerNo, and implement a two tier public/private system

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

m>m  Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

m>m  Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

m>m  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

m>m  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

m>m  Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

m>m  Personal answerYes, everyone should receive income to cover basic necessities (including food and housing). If an individual is found in violation of misusing the funds, they should face consequence (community service, military enrolment) and disqualify from being eligible for benefits again until assessed & deemed as responsible to receive. Some inquiry should be made into mental health (serious illnesses only that impair function) and learning disabilities when handling these situations. Those with significant disabilities obviously are cared for without hesitation or limitation. Addiction is not excused. Those who are able to work must contribute to the workforce, with the exception of pairings in a household — if one partner is working full time, the other may be permitted to be a homemaker or stay-at-home parent, so long as they are not requiring further financial aid.

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete

m>m  Personal answerYes, preventative dental care is an important aspect of long term health

m>m  Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance

m>m  Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes

m>m  Personal answerYes, and it should test more than just a basic level of understanding

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

m>m  Personal answerNo

m>m  Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member

m>m  Personal answerYes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media

m>m  Personal answerA combination of private and subsidized needs to exist in order to support both positive outcomes and true accessibility.

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

m>m  Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

m>m  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only for Canadian citizens

m>m  Personal answerNo, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

m>m  Personal answerNo, and we should slowly phase out funding

m>m  Personal answerYes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

m>m  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

m>m  Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerTheir federal government should subsidize child care for families that meet a mindful and appropriate guideline for need, which isn’t always limited to low income families. Families with more than three children should not qualify for subsidized child care, unless the family is blended or the third pregnancy resulted in multiples that are not the product of IVF. Private day care should continue to be available to families who choose it.

m>m  Personal answerNo, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products

m>m  Personal answerNo, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation

m>m  Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers

m>m  Personal answerYes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

m>m  Personal answerNo

m>m  Personal answerYes, and regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens

m>m  Personal answerYes, terminate benefits but also redirect to treatment. If they successfully complete treatment and remain sober for an appreciable period of time then they can resume benefits. All welfare recipients should be actively working to improve their situation with proof of effort and should not be on welfare for prolonged time frames. There should be more done to deter welfare recipients from having children while on social assistance, instead of incentivizing it. When applicable, welfare recipients should be mandated to engage in regular community service until their situation improves to continue involvement in society and to give the person a sense of purpose.

m>m  Personal answerNo, as long as all donations are public knowledge

m>m  Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

m>m  Personal answerNo, instead pursue those directly responsible for damage to lakes and rivers

m>m  Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics

m>m  Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

m>m  Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

m>m  Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs

m>m  Personal answerNo, and make it a criminal offense

m>m  Personal answerNo, but allow donations from unions and non-profits

m>m  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

m>m  Personal answerNo, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now

m>m  Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

m>m  Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

m>m  Personal answerNo, voters should decide how long they stay in office

m>m  Personal answerNo, and reinstate the death penalty for heinous premeditated crimes

m>m  Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

m>m  Personal answerMore, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

m>m  Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space

m>m  Personal answerNo, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes

m>m  Personal answerMandatory Training should be focused less in cultures/ethnicities and more on differences that are universal to all humans — such as biological gender (female rights, toxic masculinity) and disabilities.

m>m  Personal answerYes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

m>m  Personal answerYes, and implement a PISA (personal investment security account) system

m>m  Personal answerYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

m>m  Personal answerYes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

m>m  Personal answerCultural sensitivity training should be mandatory for students who demonstrate a prejudice (along with a consequence and inquiry into the origins of the learned behaviour). All students should be subject to mandatory diversity training in differences universal to all humans, like gender and disability.

m>m  Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

m>m  Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war

m>m  Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office

m>m  Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 20%

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes, and it should be illegal to burn any nation’s flag

m>m  Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency

m>m  Personal answerDecrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries

m>m  Personal answerIt’s depends on the nature of business and industry. In a broad stroke, cultural diversity should only be required in a work setting that works with a particular ethnicity or culture frequently (either in business or service). I’m undecided on how employees who commit acts of prejudice should be handled, it would have to be decided on a case-by-case basis and a verifiable act. All workplace settings should engage in some type of diversity training when it comes to neurodivergence, physical disabilities, and mental health.

m>m  Personal answerDecrease, and only allow for industries with a shortage of Canadian workers

m>m  Personal answerNo, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship

m>m  Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding

m>m  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

m>m  Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes

m>m  Personal answerYes

m>m  Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

m>m  Personal answerYes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

m>m  Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

m>m  Personal answerNo, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

m>m  Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding right now

m>m  Personal answerIt truly depends on the crime, non-violent crimes can range in nature and one uniform answer wouldn’t be suitable for all. Anyone being released from prison to remedy overcrowding should be placed in appropriate programs and participating either in daily supervised community service initiatives or enrolment in the military. An applicable form of probation should exist in both scenarios and strict consequence must be in place for violations. However there needs to be a refresh and suitability audit of current probation officers, as many are corrupt and unsuited in their profession.

m>m  Personal answerYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

m>m  Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to contribute an additional 5%-10%

m>m  Personal answerNo, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles

m>m  Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

m>m  Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

m>m  Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools

m>m  Personal answerNo, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

m>m  Personal answerNo