Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
9>9 Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings |
Healthcare › Mental Health
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with other levels of government also involved. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only by court order |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
9>9 Personal answerYes, we should. But do it with provinces and other levels of government involved. |
Healthcare › Mental Health Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with other levels of government. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, but have a approach with everybody at the table to come to a consensus. |
Social › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
9>9 Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerNot so easy. We would have to overhaul many parts of the system, and it could affect the economy in lots of ways, so we should be cautious although it does have some truth to it. |
Social › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
9>9 Personal answerYes, but also have other programs to help empower women, such as affordable childcare, as well as programs which help everyone understand the value women's equality creates for society. |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Education › University Tuition
9>9 Personal answerIt's a difficult situation, as it could limit school's ability to provide more services to students as well as funding for other programs and research, but it could also really help some students as well with the high cost of living. I would say a middle ground is to form a students union so that there is a least discussion. |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
9>9 Personal answerIt would help them, but we should also embrace multiculturalism and the opportunity we have to become more tolerant as a society towards different groups. |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
9>9 Personal answerDifficult to say sole yes or no. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
9>9 Personal answerMaintain the current rate |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system |
the Environment › Logging
9>9 Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits |
Immigration › Immigration
9>9 Personal answerNo, the current policy is sufficient |
Social › Death Penalty
9>9 Personal answerNo, too many people are innocently convicted |
Healthcare › Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Social › Niqāb
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but make sure to consult businesses affected, and make sure that there's a way to create opportunity and entrepreneurship, whether it's through subsidy and such. I would also go for market based solutions like a carbon tax, as it can help encourage innovation but also correct externalities that aren't factored in to the cost. |
Crime › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
9>9 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
9>9 Personal answerNo, influence can be made through diplomacy and other channels such as sanctions and trade, as well as military, and we shouldn't interfere with elections. |
Social › Women in Combat
9>9 Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Education › Student Loan Debt
9>9 Personal answerYes, but the provinces should also follow suit, and it should only be for certain positions that are in high demand. What we should do for the rest is slash the interest rate to zero/as well as have a pause for some income brackets. |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with provinces and other levels of government at the table to come to a consensus. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerIt depends. There's a legitimate argument to be made, as older people have more health issues which could impede decisions, but younger people also have that to some ability, so I would say we should be more cautious. |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, but it has to be a considerable effort by all parties, including the provinces to come to a path forward, and not just on self-government, but on resources and other important issues enshrined in RCAP, TRC and the MMIWG commissions. |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
9>9 Personal answerNo, I do not believe in the death penalty |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerYes, but we should have services in place to accommodate those with addiction, and we should not be unwilling to prosecute those who don't follow the law. |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
9>9 Personal answerIt should be a part of, but not the sole solution. |
Elections › Campaign Finance
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Freshwater Research
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
9>9 Personal answerThe definition of foreigner is a bit vague. We need to make sure that foreign exchange students, diplomats, refugees and ambassadors/consulates, and others have housing although they're not considered citizens because they benefit this country so much. |
the Environment › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Electoral Reform
9>9 Personal answerFirst past the post is best, as there are a lot of ridings that have numerous competitors, and could take a long time to have results settled. It could also weaken our faith in democracy if there's nobody to lead government, so I would stick with FPTP as people are fallible and I don't want the systems to also be that way. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, because we might not always have the ability to actively be able to care for everyone. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
9>9 Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Crime › Parole Hearings
9>9 Personal answerYes, but have dangerous offender legislation so that people like Paul Bernardo have a much harder time getting out. |
Housing › Affordable Housing
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
9>9 Personal answerSubsidized isn't the right word. Instead, we should have savings accounts, student loan pauses, and TFSA/RRSP as well as housing investment to help. |
Elections › Campaign Finance
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
9>9 Personal answerYes, but do it in partnership with cities and provinces. |
the Economy › Labor Unions
9>9 Personal answerA mix of both, but worth having than no one to stand up for workers and conditions. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerI would say it's debatable. A lot of products that don't biodegrade do so for a reason, such as safety and public health reasons, so there has to be more classification as to what it is, and I don't think it should be all across the board. |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
9>9 Personal answerYes, as it's a way of keeping new people in power. But it should also be long enough as they have an ability to actually see progress being made. |
the Environment › Local Environmental Guidelines
9>9 Personal answerYes, but we have to come up with ways in which it works for us, as every different nation has different factors. |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
9>9 Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount |
Social › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerIt depends on the community, but there should be baseline standards which every community should be able to work from. |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerNo, it shouldn't just be cut and spend, but also modernize and review, as well as cost benefit analysis. |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
9>9 Personal answerYes, as it brings attention to underfunded services which might not be politically popular, and help finds political support for it. |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
9>9 Personal answerYes, but it has to be on all levels, with provinces able to contribute, as well as cities/indigenous governments, as well as the federal government coming to a consensus. |
Elections › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
9>9 Personal answerProvinces should have the ability to create crown corporations and resources and the federal government should be able to regulate its side of the deal which has been reaffirmed by the courts time and time again, through revenue sharing and such. |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
9>9 Personal answerIt should be based on circumstances, and not unilateral. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Social › Employee Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerIt depends on a lot of factors, and mandatory minimums aren't the solution necessarily. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
9>9 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
9>9 Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it meets requirements and other members approve, and its people want to join as well. |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but make sure that the city also has the funds to meet it's end of the deal, so that the federal government doesn't have to step in as often, although good transit is in the national interest. |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, and help reform it and make it a better institution as it does have potential. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
9>9 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Healthcare › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerYes, but make sure it's done in a way so that people don't distrust public health officials, and there is opportunity to prevent disinformation and conspiracy. |
Domestic Policy › CBC Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, and it should be a consistent amount that isn't politicized (although some politicians make it that way.) |
Transportation › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerIt should be an option, but there should also be exploration of hydrogen fuel cell as well as other forms of low-GHG tech, as not every climate is going to work well with one thing. |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerNo, but disinformation and willful lying to the public shouldn't be tolerated, and they should be punished by Elections Canada as well as by law/courts. |
Domestic Policy › Senate
9>9 Personal answerHave a Senate made up of people from different backgrounds/walks of life that recommend public policy and advocate for different issues, as a way to make Canadian democracy stronger. |
the Environment › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerYes, but do it with provinces, cities and even private businesses. |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
9>9 Personal answerCanada doesn't really have sanctuary cities, to my knowledge. That's more of a US thing. |
Education › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerI can see why it's important, as many independent schools do have and provide programs that the public system doesn't, but we should try to have a balance of what's good for the general public (which is to keep schools public) as well as the option for more gifted students |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerDepends on a lot of factors. |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › CSA Funding
9>9 Personal answerHave a stable amount of funding. |
Foreign Policy › Venezuela Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.2k2.8k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.