@9D36K4Q

9>9  Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

9>9  Personal answerYes, but with other levels of government also involved.

9>9  Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only by court order

9>9  Personal answerYes, we should. But do it with provinces and other levels of government involved.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but with other levels of government.

9>9  Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions

9>9  Personal answerYes, but have a approach with everybody at the table to come to a consensus.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNot so easy. We would have to overhaul many parts of the system, and it could affect the economy in lots of ways, so we should be cautious although it does have some truth to it.

9>9  Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

9>9  Personal answerIt's a difficult situation, as it could limit school's ability to provide more services to students as well as funding for other programs and research, but it could also really help some students as well with the high cost of living. I would say a middle ground is to form a students union so that there is a least discussion.

9>9  Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

9>9  Personal answerYes, but also have other programs to help empower women, such as affordable childcare, as well as programs which help everyone understand the value women's equality creates for society.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

9>9  Personal answerDifficult to say sole yes or no.

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country

9>9  Personal answerMaintain the current rate

9>9  Personal answerYes, but make sure to consult businesses affected, and make sure that there's a way to create opportunity and entrepreneurship, whether it's through subsidy and such. I would also go for market based solutions like a carbon tax, as it can help encourage innovation but also correct externalities that aren't factored in to the cost.

9>9  Personal answerIt would help them, but we should also embrace multiculturalism and the opportunity we have to become more tolerant as a society towards different groups.

9>9  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system

9>9  Personal answerNo, too many people are innocently convicted

9>9  Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

9>9  Personal answerNo, the current policy is sufficient

9>9  Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

9>9  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

9>9  Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

9>9  Personal answerYes, but the provinces should also follow suit, and it should only be for certain positions that are in high demand. What we should do for the rest is slash the interest rate to zero/as well as have a pause for some income brackets.

9>9  Personal answerNo, influence can be made through diplomacy and other channels such as sanctions and trade, as well as military, and we shouldn't interfere with elections.

9>9  Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but with provinces and other levels of government at the table to come to a consensus.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but it has to be a considerable effort by all parties, including the provinces to come to a path forward, and not just on self-government, but on resources and other important issues enshrined in RCAP, TRC and the MMIWG commissions.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerIt depends. There's a legitimate argument to be made, as older people have more health issues which could impede decisions, but younger people also have that to some ability, so I would say we should be more cautious.

9>9  Personal answerNo, I do not believe in the death penalty

9>9  Personal answerYes, but we should have services in place to accommodate those with addiction, and we should not be unwilling to prosecute those who don't follow the law.

9>9  Personal answerIt should be a part of, but not the sole solution.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerThe definition of foreigner is a bit vague. We need to make sure that foreign exchange students, diplomats, refugees and ambassadors/consulates, and others have housing although they're not considered citizens because they benefit this country so much.

9>9  Personal answerI would say it's debatable. A lot of products that don't biodegrade do so for a reason, such as safety and public health reasons, so there has to be more classification as to what it is, and I don't think it should be all across the board.

9>9  Personal answerFirst past the post is best, as there are a lot of ridings that have numerous competitors, and could take a long time to have results settled. It could also weaken our faith in democracy if there's nobody to lead government, so I would stick with FPTP as people are fallible and I don't want the systems to also be that way.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, because we might not always have the ability to actively be able to care for everyone.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but do it in partnership with cities and provinces.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but have dangerous offender legislation so that people like Paul Bernardo have a much harder time getting out.

9>9  Personal answerA mix of both, but worth having than no one to stand up for workers and conditions.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, as it's a way of keeping new people in power. But it should also be long enough as they have an ability to actually see progress being made.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerSubsidized isn't the right word. Instead, we should have savings accounts, student loan pauses, and TFSA/RRSP as well as housing investment to help.

9>9  Personal answerIt depends on the community, but there should be baseline standards which every community should be able to work from.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but we have to come up with ways in which it works for us, as every different nation has different factors.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, it shouldn't just be cut and spend, but also modernize and review, as well as cost benefit analysis.

9>9  Personal answerYes, as it brings attention to underfunded services which might not be politically popular, and help finds political support for it.

9>9  Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount

9>9  Personal answerProvinces should have the ability to create crown corporations and resources and the federal government should be able to regulate its side of the deal which has been reaffirmed by the courts time and time again, through revenue sharing and such.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but it has to be on all levels, with provinces able to contribute, as well as cities/indigenous governments, as well as the federal government coming to a consensus.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerIt should be based on circumstances, and not unilateral.

9>9  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as it meets requirements and other members approve, and its people want to join as well.

9>9  Personal answerIt depends on a lot of factors, and mandatory minimums aren't the solution necessarily.

9>9  Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency

9>9  Personal answerYes, but make sure that the city also has the funds to meet it's end of the deal, so that the federal government doesn't have to step in as often, although good transit is in the national interest.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

9>9  Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

9>9  Personal answerYes, and help reform it and make it a better institution as it does have potential.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but make sure it's done in a way so that people don't distrust public health officials, and there is opportunity to prevent disinformation and conspiracy.

9>9  Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

9>9  Personal answerIt should be an option, but there should also be exploration of hydrogen fuel cell as well as other forms of low-GHG tech, as not every climate is going to work well with one thing.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and it should be a consistent amount that isn't politicized (although some politicians make it that way.)

9>9  Personal answerHave a Senate made up of people from different backgrounds/walks of life that recommend public policy and advocate for different issues, as a way to make Canadian democracy stronger.

9>9  Personal answerNo, but disinformation and willful lying to the public shouldn't be tolerated, and they should be punished by Elections Canada as well as by law/courts.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but do it with provinces, cities and even private businesses.

9>9  Personal answerCanada doesn't really have sanctuary cities, to my knowledge. That's more of a US thing.

9>9  Personal answerI can see why it's important, as many independent schools do have and provide programs that the public system doesn't, but we should try to have a balance of what's good for the general public (which is to keep schools public) as well as the option for more gifted students

9>9  Personal answerDepends on a lot of factors.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerHave a stable amount of funding.

9>9  Personal answerNo