@92YHQCV

J>J  Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

J>J  Personal answerNo because this would increase the risk of accidental shootings, therefore schools should hire trained professional security guards.

J>J  Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

J>J  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, just as long as the person under the age of 18 years old fully understands the choice of this irreversible life decision

J>J  Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination

J>J  Personal answerYes, and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, and lower taxes for the poor.

J>J  Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

J>J  Personal answerAt this point, I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but it should all depend on the circumstances. Yes, a person’s hate speech can be protected by the first amendment, just as long as it does not encourage people to commit acts of violence against others. Still, I (personally) believe that the freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government.

J>J  Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace

J>J  Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

J>J  Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone and private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. This should be in form of tax and should not be that expensive.

J>J  Personal answerYes. However, it should only cover very basic and simple topics, but if they want to, then they can be allowed to take a test that tests more than just a basic level of understanding

J>J  Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

J>J  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

J>J  Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country

J>J  Personal answerRaise for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses while eliminating deductions and loop holes.

J>J  Personal answerNo, immigrants should choose whether they want to learn English OR Not, and for those that do, the government should provide them with free language learning courses, but Personally, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country.

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, because too many people are innocently convicted. Plus, I think that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence because the dead don't suffer unless their soul was sent to hell that is.

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete

J>J  Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, just in case.

J>J  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

J>J  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

J>J  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

J>J  Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

J>J  Personal answerNo, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it.

J>J  Personal answerNo

J>J  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men because preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

J>J  Personal answerNo, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

J>J  Personal answerNo. However the sentence should depend on why the person was trafficking drugs in the first place.

J>J  Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs, and we should also retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

J>J  Personal answerIt Depends. If they have finished serving their sentence (for a minor crime (e.g., protesting)), then-Yes. However, if A. the crime was committed while in office & B. it was a felony, violent, financial, sexual, etc., crime, then-No. Still, we should disallow politicians that are OR get put under investigation for a crime, whether before OR while running for office.

J>J  Personal answerYes, drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue

J>J  Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

J>J  Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages

J>J  Personal answerNo, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material

J>J  Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

J>J  Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics

J>J  Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only for medical use, and A. immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses, & B. legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it.

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

J>J  Personal answerHelp

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for between 5 - 10 years, and even then, they will only be allowed to vote only in local elections, until they become full-fledged citizens of the United States

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, but with strict accountability.

J>J  Personal answerNo, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties

J>J  Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens

J>J  Personal answerNo, higher agencies should handle extreme situations with specialized training and equipment. However, if police departments are given strict training on how and when to use the equipment, and will only use military-grade equipment in response to extreme situations like the higher agencies with specialized training and equipment, then Yes.

J>J  Personal answerYes, but the funding for local police departments and social & community-based programs should be split equally. However, for police departments in higher crime rate communities, then the funding and training should increase.

J>J  Personal answerFewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

J>J  Personal answerYes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

J>J  Personal answerBoth Equally, to a degree, but if I had to choose only one, then I would say that I sympathize with Palestine more because of how Innocent People of Gaza are Victims of Israeli War Crimes?

J>J  Personal answerNo

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerNo, because that could Risk starting World War III, which could then evolve into a Nuclear War, which will end in Nuclear Armageddon aka a Nuclear Holocaust, resulting in the end of the world

J>J  Personal answerNo, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy

J>J  Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

J>J  Personal answerNo, but drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerIncrease, but only for countries with no human rights violations/countries that are legitimately trying to improve and modernize.

J>J  Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech, but even though I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so. Plus, it Personally believe that it has now become just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should anymore, because America is an Oligarchy and NOT a Democracy

J>J  Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

J>J  Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a very serious crime OR an act of terrorism

J>J  Personal answerNo, NAFTA has cost us nearly 700,000 American jobs. After all, free trade agreements like NAFTA, Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, and the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement have allowed too many American jobs to move overseas. Plus, Previous trade deals and the loss of manufacturing jobs have had disastrous consequences for American workers.

J>J  Personal answerDecrease

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

J>J  Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes,but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation.

J>J  Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations because of the abuse of loopholes in order to evade taxes.

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerYes, and adjust them yearly so that retired government workers can receive an income to cover the basic necessities including food and housing

J>J  Personal answerYes, until Israel and Palestine can Peacefully coexist with each other, then I want to propose for My Idea called Holy Land Reunification (German: Wiedervereinigung des Heiligen Landes, Russian: Воссоединение Святой Земли, Korean: 성지통일, Swahili: Kuunganishwa tena kwa Ardhi Takatifu, Chinese (Simplified): 圣地统一, Chinese (Traditional): 聖地統一, Spanish: Reunificación de Tierra Santa, Portuguese: Reunificação da Terra Santa, French: Réunification de la Terre Sainte, Greek: Επανένωση των Αγίων Τόπων, Latin: Terra Sancta Reunificatio, Hebrew: איחוד ארץ הקודש, Arabic: إعادة توحيد الأراضي المقدسة, Persian: اتحاد مجدد سرزمین مقدس) is the potential unification of the modern State of Israel and the State of Palestine into a single sovereign state, without both firing a shot & shedding a Drop of Blood, that everyone in both countries agree to.

J>J  Personal answerTest it first, and if it has no unforeseen negative consequences, then begin researching into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change, but at the hint of unforeseen negative consequences coming into play, then geoengineering is to be shutdown

J>J  Personal answerNo, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading

J>J  Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis while under house arrest using an electronic bracelet.

J>J  Personal answerYes & No, because Banning TikTok is a violation of free speech, but at the same time, we should do more to stop China from collecting data on our citizens.

J>J  Personal answerNo

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources

J>J  Personal answerNo, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products

J>J  Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies

J>J  Personal answerYes

J>J  Personal answerThe Answer depends on the College, but we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education until it's free because higher education should be free for everyone

J>J  Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country, plus there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement

J>J  Personal answerYes, and we should allow for the creation of more sanctuary cities

J>J  Personal answerNo, because education should not be privatized, and we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead

J>J  Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

J>J  Personal answerNo

J>J  Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency

J>J  Personal answerNo, because the level of unpredictability makes cryptocurrency simply untenable = flawed