@9CFXL4X

9>9  Personal answerPro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined

9>9  Personal answerDepends on what is "the rich" ?? I'm not rich but if I was I would be happiest knowing it was tax off me going to housing services and educational grants than it getting sent to the Chinese Communist Party of control and genocide.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

9>9  Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerRaise

9>9  Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

9>9  Personal answerLess, and provide more government funding

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, and regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only for low income students

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerIt's a terrible question. You could because we have more renewable energy in abundant natural resources but how long before a country decides to put its bid in and manage it without the general population notices it. Waste of tax dollars and probably controlled by a political stance we cannot understand. Untrustworthy liberals did this to us, that's why no party could control this without it going terribly wrong.

9>9  Personal answerNo, aboriginals should not receive any more funds until their accounting is reviewed by independent auditors

9>9  Personal answerIt's a dumb question but I'll answer it. YES... BUT... it depends on the CRIME I don't want a financial minister to be a previous offender of any financially related criminal activity etc... I could care less if he slapped someone in the head tho because in an obvious statement ... he's not a violence minister he's a financial minister. See... dumb question

9>9  Personal answerWas better when it was all illegal

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerLiberals want to build houses. And Conservatives want to lower the interest rates first... lower the interest rates first than fix the problem of housing... people can't afford the houses there in now. So let's worry about 1 thing at a time.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only provide humanitarian aid

9>9  Personal answerVery good question. Well... say I was in a bank ... say someone robbed a bank and I had my kids with me. Say I shot the robbers like some Flippin hero. Say they seen it differently... excessive force. Etc.. likely a verdict in Canada. Yay for our terrible legal and sometimes to lenient punishment... I'm not exactly sure. Yes and No. We've got bigger problems and it's upon my belief that terrible economic crisis due to irresponsible liberal government and Justin trustupid has created a higher risk for crime because people stop caring about repercussions in a world for them that makes no sense anyways.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

9>9  Personal answerHurt

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and the government should drastically reduce spending during recessions

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerI don't know.?

9>9  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerI don't know. The voting process is quite annoying. Younger ages will lack the care and attention for such an important decision also the younger ages tend to follow a more diluted online social media version of politics. I'm more right winged conservative, doesn't mean I'd vote let's say Andrew Scheer winning against Pierre Poilievre. And I like them both. Ask that question to a 15 year old and I think they would pick Poilievre just because tik tok videos of arguments against Justin Trudumb. Not because of the political stance and or overall financial GDP overlook. And if you don't see it all, you don't see it. My thoughts anyways.

9>9  Personal answerDecrease

9>9  Personal answerCreate a jail sentence for past prime ministers who couldn't figure this out previously JT, paint his face like the scary clown he is, deploying distrust and frantically screaming Canadas on fire rather than coming up with a plan to fix it and blaming others for his problems. ALL the While the Liberal Narcissistic circus fair comes around and it looks just like what you imagined... You spend way too much money and will try to sell your watch at a rigged game, the rides have people sitting in RENTED seats screaming on them as they roll by unaware of the economic misfortunes ahead, the clowns are feeling gender anxiety with purple hair and are everywhere jumping in your face as you try to casually and uncomfortably avoid them like the scariest ( IT ) movie ever seen. There's a terrible line up for free oxy-cotton candy that looks sad and lost. The hunters are losing at the bottle shooting because they have nothing to shoot with and look confused as hell, while criminals rob the guy running the bottle shoot. The news crew that had coverage on the acrobats completely decided to not cover it but instead is informing people that even tho they are in a jammed event its more important to keep their mask on and stay 6ft, and every once in awhile yelling we care about free speech but not opinions . The Liberals ride on the carousel around and around with cowboy hats singing oh Canada and it's spinning completely out of control and you realize that the nightmare has being going on for way way way too long. My opinion. Vote him out. Tax is important to fix these terrible problems but maybe its time to come up with a new tax plan to SEE where it's actually going.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerThus the elephant in the room. Yes, but be careful... this would decrease our overall by increasing the tax higher than 1 % but we need to tax harder on those who are finding it way too opportunistic and financially beneficial... Not because I'm a Marxist or believe in equality of outcome... Because you don't want to hurt those financially who just flourished by their own hard earned time and accolades who have a couple vacation homes. That's not what we're fighting here.

9>9  Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit

9>9  Personal answerYa we do need nuclear. But no it's not good solution in terms of growth. But... can we do both and maybe not be so demanding on the "cleaner" alternatives. That's in quotes for a reason BTW.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war

9>9  Personal answerThe government should not be involved in education

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerI have no clue on the matter. My answer would be of no help to you.

9>9  Personal answerNo, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

9>9  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerI don't know

9>9  Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes

9>9  Personal answerYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

9>9  Personal answerSounds like a Justin Trudeau declaration. Hahaha no we shouldn't... omg. I'm laughing hard. No. Just No. For fuqq sakes. Why would we go through the trouble when it's not functional what so ever economically for jobs or funding wise. Waste of time but I'm sure the purple hair will pile on. Hey... here's an Idea... let's make a renewable energy city from scratch and all the weirdos can live there but can't venture anywhere else for anything. And no city can give them anything... see how long the city. See if it's prosperous.

9>9  Personal answerNo, why are they getting funded at all?

9>9  Personal answerI don't know

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerRegardless, raise the maximum rate so high wage earners can contribute more

9>9  Personal answerNo, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles

9>9  Personal answerYes ... MOST important question for sure. That bombardier hand out was ridiculous 3-4 years ago. They took the Gov hand out and gave themselves bonuses. This would make them atleast think about it.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerI don't know. If it's like trans mountain pipeline than you really need to see the truth on if they slow the work down on purpose to milk the government funds to keep the project longer. High paying wage continues on and on. Then your conclusion is that yes but it took 15 years instead of 5.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency

9>9  Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as highly regulated securities

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerYa. I mean this I'm not entirely against with the right parameters set in place. As long as it's 100 % human controlled from the time it takes off til the time it lands. Anything falls it's 5 years in jail. Anybody caught in automatic mode or transportation of illegal substances gets 1 year jail and $50,000 penalty. Set in stone no questions asked.

9>9  Personal answerYes