Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Healthcare › Mental Health
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
9>9 Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only by court order |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
Social › Gender Identity
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
9>9 Personal answerService should be a choice instead of an obligation, and I'm lucky to say this as I know that in countries like Finland and South Korea, it's mandatory for everyone to serve in the military. |
Social › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
9>9 Personal answerIn the middle. Undecided on this. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, they should. But it should also be regulation that works with the market to find a meaningful solution. That's why I support carbon pricing, because it is a market-based solution that gets people to find innovative ways to reduce their carbon emissions. Too often, environmental regulations just end up creating new problems, so we've got to be really careful and |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but we should also embrace the diversity of languages and culture that immigrants bring. It does wonders in making us a more tolerant and less-divisive society. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerLess, and provide more government funding |
Healthcare › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
9>9 Personal answerNo, too many people are innocently convicted |
the Environment › Logging
9>9 Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits |
Social › Niqāb
9>9 Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media |
Crime › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Immigration › Immigration
9>9 Personal answerNo, the current policy is sufficient |
Healthcare › Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
9>9 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
Social › Women in Combat
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
9>9 Personal answerNo, I do not believe in the death penalty |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
Healthcare › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Freshwater Research
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerIt's a good idea to bring back biodegradable products, but what we should really be doing is finding and encouraging ways for people to eat together at home, and reduce our dependency overall on disposable products, period. |
Elections › Electoral Reform
9>9 Personal answerNo, keep the current “first past the post” system |
the Environment › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, because we don't entirely know the reasons why they could've refused shelter. It could be because maybe they feel unsafe in that environment, and have had multiple incidents, so while it may be of inconvenience, it's necessary as public property often has necessities (bathrooms, etc) that the homeless need. |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Affordable Housing
9>9 Personal answerI would say that it should be a mix of all three of these answers. If it houses the homeless, that's always good to get someone a safe place to live. If it is within a city, and trying to make the downtown area more densified, that's always a good thing for the environment, and we should also encourage people to open up their homes to people looking to rent, within reason as they don't always feel safe doing so. But yes, I would say building 1.4 million homes is a good idea, as we are going to need them, and though it might not solve everything with the affordability crisis, we can at least increase demand, and do other things like stopping speculation buying. |
Crime › Parole Hearings
9>9 Personal answerYes, provided a strict psychological evaluation shows they are no longer a threat to society |
the Economy › Labor Unions
9>9 Personal answerA mix of both. Unions can do great things in making workplaces safer, and also potentially argue for higher wages which benefits the economy and lessens the burden on government, but they can also be used for hurtful purposes as well. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should only be allowed to vote in local elections |
Elections › Campaign Finance
9>9 Personal answerNo, these types of donations just turn into bribes |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
9>9 Personal answerNo, voters should decide how long they stay in office |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
9>9 Personal answerYes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerDepends and should vary on the police department. If a police department needs training and extra support, we should fund the department whilst also funding community-based programs that reduce recidivism rates and keep the public safe. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
9>9 Personal answerYes, as there are legitimate concerns that do need to be heard, but some industries are incredibly important and deliver life-saving treatment (nurses, doctors) so we also need to do something about that as well that is in the best interests of both. |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
9>9 Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
9>9 Personal answerNationalize |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
9>9 Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
Education › Postsecondary Education
9>9 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
9>9 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
the Economy › NAFTA
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote |
Transportation › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerIdeally, yes. But it should also be cost-effective and easy for cities to run and operate. |
Domestic Policy › CBC Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Senate
9>9 Personal answerLeave as is |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
9>9 Personal answerDepends on what "non-violent offences" mean, as it is a very broad category that encompasses all kinds of offences. If they're a drug addict, they shouldn't be in jail and should be getting treatment. |
Education › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerIt really depends on the situation of each municipality, because while it's easy to say that we should spend that money on infrastructure to attract businesses and make it a desirable place to live, what if the company builds that infrastructure that could make it attractive for the city? It's really hard to say. |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Venezuela Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.