Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
5>5 Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
5>5 Personal answerNo, and gay couples should not be able to adopt children |
Social › Gay Marriage
5>5 Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
5>5 Personal answerBig Pharma is out of control, but so is government spending. We could afford prescriptions if we weren't paying for drug addicts all the time. Just let the bastards OD. A clean-up crew and cremation services would be cheaper in the long run. |
Education › University Tuition
5>5 Personal answerRegardless, privatize education and let the free market determine the tuition rates |
Social › Gender Identity
5>5 Personal answerNo, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
5>5 Personal answerNo, we need to stop covering bullshit too. I haven't been to the doctor in months. I cant even remember what the last time I went was for. I know people that go to the doctor because they have a sore neck for a few days. The doctor tells them the same thing I tell them. "Get some damned exercise, sit up straight and get the hell off the computer." The only difference is, the doctor can afford a swanky house and a Porsche. |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
5>5 Personal answerNo, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
5>5 Personal answerNo, most minimum wage jobs are meant to develop experience, not support a family |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law |
Social › Euthanasia
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
5>5 Personal answerYes, preventative dental care is an important aspect of long term health |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
5>5 Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Social › Death Penalty
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Social › Niqāb
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Logging
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
5>5 Personal answerYes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
5>5 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
5>5 Personal answerNo, women are not as physically capable as men for combat |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
5>5 Personal answer"No, they should be integrated into Canadian society as citizens" I have native heritage. By and large, they're a bunch of degenerates. They've suffered from the same thing that is currently being pushed on Canadians. Miscegination. Canada was something like 94% white when it was founded. I am proud of my European heritage. European culture is the sole reason this country exists. This multicult society only ensures that whites end up as natives have. They have no identity anymore. They're basically white at this point. |
Healthcare › Healthcare
5>5 Personal answerFederal |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
5>5 Personal answerChildren are best raised in a household wherein the parents are married, heterosexual, and one of them stays home with the children. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answerNo, we should pass tougher drug laws |
Immigration › Immigration
5>5 Personal answerYes, we currently have too many immigrants |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
5>5 Personal answerNo, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
5>5 Personal answerNo, as long as all donations are public knowledge |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
5>5 Personal answerYes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
Elections › Electoral Reform
5>5 Personal answerThe party system is foolish. Extremely partizan politics ensue. Furthermore, the big 3 are all anyone bothers voting for because of this stupid "strategic voting" nonsense. FURTHERMORE they're all the same! There's the communist party, communist party lite, liberal party, and liberal party lite. I don't have the answer for what the system should be. I just want a Canadian Le Pen, Trump, Petry, Salvani or Orban to vote for. |
the Environment › Fracking
5>5 Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
5>5 Personal answerYes, as long as they cut all economic and military support from Canada |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
5>5 Personal answer"No, transportation services should be left to the private sector" I'm sick of paying for these big cities. BC transit is garbage, therefor I took the few hundred bucks I'd have spent on a bus pass and got myself a bike. I now have a great ass and nice legs. |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
5>5 Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages |
the Economy › Labor Unions
5>5 Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
Healthcare › Marijuana
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for medical use |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
5>5 Personal answerNo, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
5>5 Personal answerNo, voters should decide how long they stay in office |
Crime › Parole Hearings
5>5 Personal answerDepends on context. As an example, if the father of the German youth who was gangraped by 6 or so Muslims (who then posted a video of them bragging about it) were to visciously slaughter them all, I don't think he should even be given a sentence. Give the man a metal, I say. |
the Economy › Free Trade
5>5 Personal answerCanada should trade with the best interest of Canadians in mind. I'm sick of this globalist bullshit being pushed all of the time. |
the Economy › Welfare
5>5 Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
the Economy › Pension Tax
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
5>5 Personal answerNationalize it, but don't cripple it with all of this green bullshit. You need money to invest and research renewable energy. You're not going to get the money needed for that on wishes and stardust. Canada could be an economic superpower, yet Prime Minister Weed Man is too worried about Feminism, Carbon tax (to pay for his swanky vacations) and committing cultural suicide to build the foundation for Canada to be a majour player in world affairs. |
the Economy › Government Spending
5>5 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
5>5 Personal answerControl inflation and reign in banks. They wont need more money if the amount of money things cost isn't increasing every year as a result of this retarded debt-based currency we have. |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
5>5 Personal answerIf the policy revolves around strengthening the family unit, removing no fault divorce and encouraging monogamy, then sure. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
5>5 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answer"Yes, they should be removed from society" By this I mean that drug addicts should be allowed to OD and die, and drug dealers should be shot if found guilty. Drugs are bad, kids. |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
5>5 Personal answerNo, it is a slippery slope towards a police state No, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
5>5 Personal answerDecrease, and only allow for industries with a shortage of Canadian workers |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
5>5 Personal answerDecrease |
Education › Postsecondary Education
5>5 Personal answerThe government should not be involved in education |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
5>5 Personal answerIncrease |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
5>5 Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
5>5 Personal answerYes, and nationalise the banks |
Domestic Policy › Senate
5>5 Personal answerElect, and require members to be non-partisan |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
5>5 Personal answerI think it should depend on what they make during the season, in relation to the average income. Average income as in, don't count CEO's and corporate lawyers and neurosurgeons and hedgefund managers and... well, you get the point. If your average working household makes $50,000 in a year, and a farmer rakes in $40,000 profit after all his overhead is payed, he has nothing to complain about. How long is he out of work for? Why can't he get a job in one of the trades while he's out of season? |
the Economy › Government Pensions
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for low-income pensioners |
the Economy › Income Splitting
5>5 Personal answerFor me, it's less about making sure all of us wage slaves are contributing our fair share, and more about making the 1% (especially the .1%) are. Also, we wouldn't need so much money if we stopped spending it on idiotic things. |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
5>5 Personal answerNo, privacy is more important than statistics |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
5>5 Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
5>5 Personal answerOnly if I can shoot them out of the sky if they get near my house. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 4.5k90 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.