Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
B>B Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Healthcare › Mental Health
B>B Personal answerYes |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
B>B Personal answerNo |
Social › Gay Marriage
B>B Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
B>B Personal answerno .... tolerance needs to be fostered & taught not legislated, not sure why gender is so critical, don't have enough information, it will take time for society to make the necessary changes to be gender netural |
the Economy › Taxes
B>B Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
B>B Personal answerNo |
Education › University Tuition
B>B Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
B>B Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
B>B Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
B>B Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
B>B Personal answerYes but with it should come requirement for community work requirements. Should be for very basics only and restricted to basics only - not alchohol, smokes, recreational drugs etc. If going to live off society there should be limits of what is allowed. Opportunties to become gainfully employed should be readily available. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
B>B Personal answerNo, only for assault weapons |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
B>B Personal answerMore |
Social › Niqāb
B>B Personal answerYes but their idenity should be verified & then idenfitication certificate or such should be wore at all times. |
Immigration › Immigration
B>B Personal answerYes - but it should involve regular checks to make sure immigrants are adapting to Canadian ways and are becoming productive citizens. I would say that after 5 years, if an immigrant can't adapt, then they should be denied Canadian citizenship as an incentive to move on - or back. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerNo but immigrants must be willing to be Canadian first. Not expect everyone to confirm to them. Not receive benefits immediately. |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
B>B Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
B>B Personal answerYes |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
B>B Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
B>B Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
B>B Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
B>B Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
B>B Personal answerat this time hurt, they had their place but have gone to far |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare
B>B Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
Crime › Defunding the Police
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
B>B Personal answerPrivatize |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
B>B Personal answerGovernment should increase taxes on property owners that do not contribute to Canadian economy in any other way. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
B>B Personal answerDecrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
B>B Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Education › Postsecondary Education
B>B Personal answerThe government should not be involved in education |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
B>B Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
B>B Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
B>B Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Pensions
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
B>B Personal answerno but should be appropriately taxed |
Domestic Policy › CBC Funding
B>B Personal answerNo |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
B>B Personal answermaybe need more information on cost of electronic braclet but I think combo of house arrest, limited or controled access to others, drug testing, community service or commhnity work, educations/skill building along with mental health treatment might reduce the repeat offenders and volume of crime. |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
B>B Personal answerNo, employment insurance should be a insurance program you pay into your get out of it & only porportionate to what you paid in, employee should be able to pay more in. this should not be an employer cost. |
Domestic Policy › Senate
B>B Personal answerAbolish |
the Economy › Income Splitting
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
B>B Personal answershould be used for CPP only, should have the opt out option, |
the Economy › State Ownership
B>B Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
Education › Charter Schools
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
B>B Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
B>B Personal answerYes with regulation |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 4191 reply3 agree6 disagree
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7810 replies3 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
