Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
J>J Personal answerYes |
Social › Abortion
J>J Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Healthcare › Mental Health
J>J Personal answerNo, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
J>J Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
J>J Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
J>J Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
J>J Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Social › Hate Speech
J>J Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
J>J Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
J>J Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Social › Euthanasia
J>J Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
J>J Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
J>J Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
J>J Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
J>J Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
J>J Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
J>J Personal answerNo, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country |
Social › Death Penalty
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Social › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
Social › Niqāb
J>J Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
J>J Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Crime › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
J>J Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
J>J Personal answerNo |
Social › Women in Combat
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
J>J Personal answerYes, but scale back our current involvement |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if there is proof someone died from the drugs they trafficked |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
J>J Personal answerYes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
J>J Personal answerNo, but legalize drugs |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Elections › Campaign Finance
J>J Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
Healthcare › Vaccine Passports
J>J Personal answerNo, we are too early into the pandemic to decide this |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
J>J Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
J>J Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
J>J Personal answerNo, this is a waste of time and money |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
J>J Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material |
the Environment › Fracking
J>J Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
the Environment › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Healthcare › Marijuana
J>J Personal answerYes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
the Economy › Labor Unions
J>J Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
J>J Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Elections › Campaign Finance
J>J Personal answerNo, these types of donations just turn into bribes |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
J>J Personal answerYes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
J>J Personal answerNo |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
J>J Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
Crime › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare
J>J Personal answerMore, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
J>J Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
the Economy › Government Spending
J>J Personal answerNo, reduce military spending instead |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
J>J Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
J>J Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
J>J Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
J>J Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so |
Transportation › Public Transportation
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
J>J Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
J>J Personal answerDecrease |
the Economy › NAFTA
J>J Personal answerYes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
J>J Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
J>J Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Pensions
J>J Personal answerNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
J>J Personal answerNo, but we should increase funding to offer education and skill building services for prisoners |
the Economy › Bitcoin
J>J Personal answerNo, and it has no intrinsic value |
the Economy › Tariffs
J>J Personal answerNo, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products |
the Economy › State Ownership
J>J Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
J>J Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
J>J Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
Education › Charter Schools
J>J Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.