Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
L>L Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
L>L Personal answerNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings |
Healthcare › Mental Health
L>L Personal answerYes |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
L>L Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
L>L Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
L>L Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
the Economy › Taxes
L>L Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
L>L Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
L>L Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
L>L Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
L>L Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
L>L Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
L>L Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
L>L Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
L>L Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
L>L Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
L>L Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Social › Transgender Athletes
L>L Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
Social › Death Penalty
L>L Personal answerNo, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
L>L Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Social › Niqāb
L>L Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
L>L Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Crime › Private Prisons
L>L Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
L>L Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Social › Women in Combat
L>L Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
L>L Personal answerYes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
L>L Personal answerNo, sentence them to life in prison without parole instead |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
L>L Personal answerNo, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana |
Healthcare › Vaccine Passports
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as they are not mandatory |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
L>L Personal answerIncrease |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
L>L Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
L>L Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
L>L Personal answerNo, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
the Environment › Animal Testing
L>L Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
L>L Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Healthcare › Marijuana
L>L Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
L>L Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
L>L Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate |
the Economy › Labor Unions
L>L Personal answerHelp |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
L>L Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
L>L Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare
L>L Personal answerFewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
L>L Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
L>L Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
the Economy › Government Spending
L>L Personal answerNo, increase taxes on the wealthy instead |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
L>L Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
L>L Personal answerNo, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
L>L Personal answerIncrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
L>L Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
L>L Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
the Economy › NAFTA
L>L Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
L>L Personal answerYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Transportation › Public Transportation
L>L Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
L>L Personal answerDecrease |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
L>L Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
L>L Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
L>L Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
L>L Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
L>L Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
L>L Personal answerYes |
Education › Charter Schools
L>L Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
L>L Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 6.6k123 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.4k1.4k replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.5k3.2k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
